• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于为紧急血液学教育博客系列的开发提供信息的大规模在线需求评估 (MONA)。

The Massive Online Needs Assessment (MONA) to inform the development of an emergency haematology educational blog series.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Jun;7(3):219-223. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0406-0.

DOI:10.1007/s40037-018-0406-0
PMID:29488097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6002288/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online educational resources are criticized as being teacher-centred, failing to address learner's needs. Needs assessments are an important precursor to inform curriculum development, but these are often overlooked or skipped by developers of online educational resources due to cumbersome measurement tools. Novel methods are required to identify perceived and unperceived learning needs to allow targeted development of learner-centred curricula.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of performing a novel technique dubbed the Massive Online Needs Assessment (MONA) for the purpose of emergency haematology online educational curricular planning, within an online learning community (affiliated with the Free Open Access Medical education movement).

METHODS

An online survey was launched on CanadiEM.org using an embedded Google Forms survey. Participants were recruited using the study website and a social media campaign (utilizing Twitter, Facebook, Blogs, and a poster) targeting a specific online community. Web analytics were used to monitor participation rates in addition to survey responses.

RESULTS

The survey was open from 20 September to 10 December 2016 and received 198 complete responses representing 6 medical specialties from 21 countries. Most survey respondents identified themselves as staff physicians (n = 109) and medical trainees (n = 75). We identified 17 high-priority perceived needs, 17 prompted needs, and 10 topics with unperceived needs through our MONA process.

CONCLUSIONS

A MONA is a feasible, novel method for collecting data on perceived, prompted, and unperceived learning needs to inform an online emergency haematology educational blog. This methodology could be useful to the developers of other online education resources.

摘要

背景

在线教育资源被批评为以教师为中心,无法满足学习者的需求。需求评估是课程开发的重要前提,但由于测量工具繁琐,在线教育资源的开发者往往忽视或跳过这些评估。需要新的方法来识别感知和未感知的学习需求,以便有针对性地开发以学习者为中心的课程。

目的

评估一种新颖的技术(称为大规模在线需求评估(MONA))在在线学习社区(隶属于免费开放获取医学教育运动)内进行紧急血液学在线教育课程规划的可行性。

方法

在 CanadiEM.org 上使用嵌入式 Google Forms 调查发起了一项在线调查。使用研究网站和社交媒体活动(利用 Twitter、Facebook、博客和海报)来招募参与者,针对特定的在线社区。使用网络分析来监测参与率以及调查回复。

结果

该调查于 2016 年 9 月 20 日至 12 月 10 日开放,收到了来自 21 个国家的 6 个医学专业的 198 份完整回复。大多数调查受访者自称为主治医生(n=109)和医学实习生(n=75)。通过我们的 MONA 流程,我们确定了 17 个高优先级感知需求、17 个提示需求和 10 个未感知需求的主题。

结论

MONA 是一种收集感知、提示和未感知学习需求数据的可行的新颖方法,可用于在线紧急血液学教育博客。这种方法对于其他在线教育资源的开发者可能很有用。

相似文献

1
The Massive Online Needs Assessment (MONA) to inform the development of an emergency haematology educational blog series.用于为紧急血液学教育博客系列的开发提供信息的大规模在线需求评估 (MONA)。
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Jun;7(3):219-223. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0406-0.
2
Emergency medicine educational resource use in Cape Town: modern or traditional?开普敦急诊医学教育资源的使用:现代的还是传统的?
Postgrad Med J. 2017 May;93(1099):250-255. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134135. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
3
Four strategies to find, evaluate, and engage with online resources in emergency medicine.在急诊医学中查找、评估和利用在线资源的四种策略。
CJEM. 2018 Mar;20(2):293-299. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.387. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Implementing peer review at an emergency medicine blog: bridging the gap between educators and clinical experts.在一个急诊医学博客上实施同行评审:弥合教育工作者与临床专家之间的差距。
CJEM. 2015 Mar;17(2):188-91. doi: 10.2310/8000.2014.141393.
5
Developing ClerkCast: An Emergency Medicine Clerkship Needs Assessment Project.开发ClerkCast:一个急诊医学实习需求评估项目。
Cureus. 2020 Mar 29;12(3):e7459. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7459.
6
Individual Gestalt Is Unreliable for the Evaluation of Quality in Medical Education Blogs: A METRIQ Study.个体格式塔对于医学教育博客质量评估不可靠:一项METRIQ研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;70(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.025. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAM) in Emergency Medicine: The Global Distribution of Users in 2016.急诊医学中的自由开放获取医学教育(FOAM):2016 年用户的全球分布情况。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 May;19(3):600-605. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.3.36825. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
8
Utilisation of internet resources for continuing professional development: a cross-sectional survey of general practitioners in Scotland.利用互联网资源促进持续专业发展:对苏格兰全科医生的横断面调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 21;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0540-5.
9
A novel multimodal needs assessment to inform the longitudinal education program for an international interprofessional critical care team.一种新的多模式需求评估方法,用于为国际跨专业重症监护团队的纵向教育计划提供信息。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 13;22(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03605-2.
10
Development of an international online learning platform for hepatopancreatobiliary surgical training: a needs assessment.开发用于肝胆胰外科手术培训的国际在线学习平台:需求评估
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Dec;16(12):1127-32. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12289. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Educator's blueprint: Key considerations for using social media in survey-based medical education research.教育者蓝图:基于调查的医学教育研究中使用社交媒体的关键考量因素
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 23;8(5):e11026. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11026. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Designing a Multidisciplinary Cardio-obstetrics Curriculum for General Cardiology and Obstetrics Residents: A National Survey of Educational Needs.为普通心脏病学和妇产科住院医师设计多学科心脏妇产科课程:一项教育需求的全国性调查。
CJC Open. 2023 Dec 18;6(2Part B):174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.12.014. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Guidelines: The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging a Virtual Community of Practice to Participate in a Survey-based Study: A Description of the METRIQ Study Methodology.利用实践虚拟社区参与基于调查的研究:METRIQ研究方法的描述。
AEM Educ Train. 2017 Mar 22;1(2):110-113. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10013. eCollection 2017 Apr.
2
Individual Gestalt Is Unreliable for the Evaluation of Quality in Medical Education Blogs: A METRIQ Study.个体格式塔对于医学教育博客质量评估不可靠:一项METRIQ研究
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;70(3):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.12.025. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
3
Needs Assessment in Postgraduate Medical Education: A Review.
指南:创建开放教育资源的可做、不可做和未知事项。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jan 9;12(1):25-40. doi: 10.5334/pme.817. eCollection 2023.
4
The Future of Emergency Medicine (EM) Sim Cases: A Modified Massive Online Needs Assessment.急诊医学(EM)模拟病例的未来:一项改进的大规模在线需求评估。
Cureus. 2022 Jul 12;14(7):e26799. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26799. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Beyond the CLAIM: A comprehensive needs assessment strategy for creating an Advanced Medical Education Research Training Program (ARMED-MedEd).超越声明:创建高级医学教育研究培训项目(ARMED-MedEd)的综合需求评估策略
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Feb 1;6(1):e10720. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10720. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
The medical simulation blog: A pilot project in Italy.医学模拟博客:意大利的一个试点项目。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1920089. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1920089.
7
Social media and the modern scientist: a research primer for low- and middle-income countries.社交媒体与现代科学家:低收入和中等收入国家的研究入门指南
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 2):S120-S124. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 25.
8
Converting to Connect: A Rapid RE-AIM Evaluation of the Digital Conversion of a Clerkship Curriculum in the Age of COVID-19.转向线上教学:对新冠疫情时代临床实习课程数字化转型的快速RE-AIM评估
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Aug 9;4(4):330-339. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10498. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Emergency Medicine Education Research Since the 2012 Consensus Conference: How Far Have We Come and What's Next?自2012年共识会议以来的急诊医学教育研究:我们取得了哪些进展,下一步是什么?
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Nov 22;4(Suppl 1):S57-S66. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10404. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Thinking Critically About Appraising FOAM.批判性地思考评估循证医学辅助开放获取资源(FOAM)
AEM Educ Train. 2019 May 23;3(4):398-402. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10352. eCollection 2019 Oct.
研究生医学教育中的需求评估:综述
Med Educ Online. 2002 Dec;7(1):4542. doi: 10.3402/meo.v7i.4542.
4
Who Are the Most Influential Emergency Physicians on Twitter?推特上最具影响力的急诊医生都有谁?
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):281-287. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.11.31299. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Evidence-based medicine in the era of social media: Scholarly engagement through participation and online interaction.社交媒体时代的循证医学:通过参与和在线互动进行学术交流。
CJEM. 2018 Jan;20(1):3-8. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.407. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
6
An Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Core Content Covered by Free Open Access Medical Education Resources.对免费开放获取医学教育资源所涵盖的急诊医学核心内容的评估
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 May;67(5):649-653.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
CJEM and the changing landscape of medical education and knowledge translation.《加拿大急诊医学杂志》与医学教育及知识转化的不断变化格局。
CJEM. 2015 Mar;17(2):184-7. doi: 10.1017/cem.2015.16.
8
Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.探索医生专科医生对基于网络的调查的回应率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 9;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z.
9
Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices.推特作为学术医学领域交流与知识共享的工具:给怀疑者和新手的指南。
Med Teach. 2015 May;37(5):411-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.993371. Epub 2014 Dec 19.