通过新颖的同意方法，让在研究中代表性不足的人群参与进来。
Engaging populations underrepresented in research through novel approaches to consent.
机构信息
Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
出版信息
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018 Mar;178(1):75-80. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31600. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Abstract
The lack of diversity of populations included in genomics databases is an important inhibitor of genomic discovery from bench to bedside. One way to increase the diversity of participants is to ensure that informed consent processes are designed for cultural and linguistic concordance for non-majority populations. This article describes two case studies of genomics research studies that are using novel approaches to informed consent to increase recruitment and retention of participants from traditionally underrepresented populations: The Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) study, part of the Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, and the All of Us Research Program, part of the Precision Medicine Initiative. We conclude by proposing a community of practice among researchers seeking to improve informed consent to increase diversity in genomics research.
摘要
基因组学数据库中纳入的人群缺乏多样性，这是从实验室到临床的基因组学发现的一个重要障碍。增加参与者多样性的一种方法是确保知情同意过程针对非多数人群的文化和语言一致性进行设计。本文描述了两项正在使用新颖的知情同意方法来增加传统代表性不足人群的参与者招募和保留的基因组学研究案例：癌症健康评估惠及众多人（CHARM）研究，是临床测序证据生成研究（CSER）联盟的一部分，以及美国所有人研究计划，是精准医学倡议的一部分。最后，我们提出了一个由寻求改进知情同意以增加基因组学研究多样性的研究人员组成的实践社区。
相似文献
1
Engaging populations underrepresented in research through novel approaches to consent.通过新颖的同意方法，让在研究中代表性不足的人群参与进来。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018 Mar;178(1):75-80. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31600. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
2
Leading the way to genomic medicine.引领基因组医学之路。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar;166C(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31384. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
3
Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.临床测序探索性研究联盟：加速基于证据的基因组医学实践。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1051-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 12.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
Implementing a universal informed consent process for the Research Program.为该研究项目实施通用的知情同意程序。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2019;24:427-438.
6
Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium.应对电子病历与基因组学（eMERGE）联盟中的实时伦理、法律和社会问题。
Genet Med. 2010 Oct;12(10):616-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181efdbd0.
7
Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent.基因组研究与数据挖掘技术：对个人隐私和知情同意的影响。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2004;6(1):15-28. doi: 10.1023/b:etin.0000036156.77169.31.
8
Groups, communities, and contested identities in genetic research.基因研究中的群体、社区与有争议的身份认同。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Nov-Dec;30(6):38-45.
9
Perspectives on Electronic Informed Consent From Patients Underrepresented in Research in the United States: A Focus Group Study.美国研究中代表性不足患者对电子知情同意的看法：一项焦点小组研究
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):338-348. doi: 10.1177/1556264618773883. Epub 2018 May 23.
10
The Harvard case of Xu Xiping: exploitation of the people, scientific advance, or genetic theft?徐希平的哈佛事件：是对民众的剥削、科学进步还是基因盗窃？
New Genet Soc. 2005 Apr;24(1):57-78. doi: 10.1080/14636770500037776.
引用本文的文献
1
Methodological opportunities in genomic data analysis to advance health equity.基因组数据分析中促进健康公平的方法学机遇。
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00839-w.
2
Using technology to increase reach and optimize consent experience for a large-scale research program.利用技术扩大大规模研究项目的覆盖范围并优化知情同意流程体验。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 25;9(1):e15. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.640. eCollection 2025.
3
Enablers and barriers to engaging under-served groups in research: Survey of the United Kingdom research professional's views.让服务不足群体参与研究的促进因素和障碍：对英国研究专业人员观点的调查
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Dec 18;3:37. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13434.2. eCollection 2023.
4
The ethical challenges of diversifying genomic data: A qualitative evidence synthesis.基因组数据多样化的伦理挑战：一项定性证据综合分析。
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2023 Sep 12;2:e1. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.20. eCollection 2024.
5
Public engagement with genomics.公众对基因组学的参与。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Sep 18;8:310. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19473.2. eCollection 2023.
6
Overcoming the exclusion of marginalized caregiver and patient groups in pediatric brain tumor research.克服儿科脑肿瘤研究中对边缘化护理人员和患者群体的排斥。
Neurooncol Pract. 2023 Jun 12;10(5):403-405. doi: 10.1093/nop/npad030. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Equity Concerns Across Pediatric Research Recruitment: An Analysis of Research Staff Interviews.儿科研究招募中的公平性问题：研究人员访谈分析
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Mar;24(2):318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.06.032. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
8
Antiracist symptom science: A call to action and path forward.反种族主义症状科学：行动呼吁与前进道路。
Nurs Outlook. 2022 Nov-Dec;70(6):794-806. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.07.014. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
9
Facebook recruitment for research of children and parents during the COVID-19 pandemic.脸书招募研究人员，研究 COVID-19 大流行期间的儿童和家长。
Appl Nurs Res. 2022 Jun;65:151574. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151574. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
10
Practices and Attitudes toward Returning Genomic Research Results to Low-Resource Research Participants.向资源匮乏的研究参与者返还基因组研究结果的做法和态度。
Public Health Genomics. 2021;24(5-6):241-252. doi: 10.1159/000516782. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research.优先考虑人类基因组学研究中的多样性。
Nat Rev Genet. 2018 Mar;19(3):175-185. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.89. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
2
Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.重新构建临床研究中的同意书：基于功能的方法。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(12):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448.
3
Utilization of a Smartphone Platform for Electronic Informed Consent in Acute Stroke Trials.智能手机平台在急性中风试验中用于电子知情同意书的应用
Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):3156-3160. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018380. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Genomics is failing on diversity.基因组学在多样性方面表现不佳。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
5
A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent.一项关于医学实践研究的多媒体信息辅助工具的随机研究：对知情同意的影响。
Clin Trials. 2017 Feb;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1177/1740774516669352. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
6
Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.基因误诊与健康差异的可能性。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 18;375(7):655-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1507092.
7
A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trials.改善文化和语言多样化人群参与临床试验的方法综述。
Trials. 2016 May 26;17(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1384-3.
8
A multimedia consent tool for research participants in the Gambia: a randomized controlled trial.针对冈比亚研究参与者的多媒体同意工具：一项随机对照试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 May 1;93(5):320-328A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.146159. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.志愿者参与的研究的参与者理解：系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Nov;46(6):423-31. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12097. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
10
Comparison of the clinical prediction model PREMM(1,2,6) and molecular testing for the systematic identification of Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer.比较 PREMM(1,2,6)临床预测模型和分子检测在结直肠癌中系统识别林奇综合征的效果。
Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):272-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301265. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
Zotero 插件