• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.临床测序探索性研究联盟:加速基于证据的基因组医学实践。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1051-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 12.
2
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations.临床测序证据生成研究联盟:在不同和医疗资源不足的人群中整合基因组测序。
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Sep 6;103(3):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007.
3
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.临床测序探索性研究联盟中九个实验室对ACMG-AMP变异解读指南的执行情况。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 May 12.
4
Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.外显子组测序一致性基因分型器(CGES):提高外显子组变异基因型的质量
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):187-93. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu591. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
5
Approaches to carrier testing and results disclosure in translational genomics research: The clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium experience.转化基因组学研究中携带者检测及结果披露的方法:临床测序探索性研究联盟的经验
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018 Nov;6(6):898-909. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.453. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
6
The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies.eMERGE 网络:一个由生物库组成的联盟,与电子病历数据相关联,用于进行基因组研究。
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Jan 26;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-13.
7
Consideration of Cosegregation in the Pathogenicity Classification of Genomic Variants.基因组变异致病性分类中共同分离的考量
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1077-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 May 26.
8
Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.临床测序探索研究联盟中基因组序列数据中可操作基因的识别的过程和初步结果。
Genet Med. 2013 Nov;15(11):860-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.133. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
9
Leading the way to genomic medicine.引领基因组医学之路。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar;166C(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31384. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
10
Variant Classification Concordance using the ACMG-AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines across Nine Genomic Implementation Research Studies.使用 ACMG-AMP 变异解释指南对九个基因组实施研究进行变异分类一致性评估。
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Nov 5;107(5):932-941. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Genetic Screening: Harnessing Health Information to Prevent Disease Risks.了解基因筛查:利用健康信息预防疾病风险。
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Jan 21;22(4):903-919. doi: 10.7150/ijms.101219. eCollection 2025.
2
Far from Home: Managing Incidental Findings in Field Research with Portable MRI.离家万里:利用便携式磁共振成像管理实地研究中的偶然发现
J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(4):805-815. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.169. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
3
Combined bioinformatic and splicing analysis of likely benign intronic and synonymous variants reveals evidence for pathogenicity.对可能为良性的内含子和同义变异进行联合生物信息学和剪接分析,揭示了其致病性证据。
Genet Med Open. 2024 May 15;2:101850. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101850. eCollection 2024.
4
The Surviving, Not Thriving, Photoreceptors in Patients with Stargardt Disease.患有斯塔加特病患者中存活但未茁壮成长的光感受器
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;14(14):1545. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141545.
5
Blurred Boundaries: Toward an Expanded Ethics of Research and Clinical Care.模糊的界限:迈向研究与临床护理的扩展伦理
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Aug;23(8):5-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2224148. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
Parents' Perspectives on Secondary Genetic Ancestry Findings in Pediatric Genomic Medicine.家长对儿科基因组医学中二级遗传祖先检测结果的看法。
Clin Ther. 2023 Aug;45(8):719-728. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
7
Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) and challenges in the design of a randomized controlled trial to test the online return of cancer genetic research results to U.S. Black women.伦理、法律和社会影响(ELSI)以及设计一项随机对照试验以测试美国黑人女性癌症遗传研究结果在线返还的挑战。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107309. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107309. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
8
Poison exon annotations improve the yield of clinically relevant variants in genomic diagnostic testing.毒蕈碱受体基因外显子注释可提高基因组诊断检测中临床相关变异的检出率。
Genet Med. 2023 Aug;25(8):100884. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100884. Epub 2023 May 6.
9
Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.使用大规模或全基因组测序进行基因组研究的结果回报:迈向新常态。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:393-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
WGS Data Collections: How Do Genomic Databases Transform Medicine?WGS 数据收集:基因组数据库如何改变医学?
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 3;24(3):3031. doi: 10.3390/ijms24033031.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.临床测序探索性研究联盟中九个实验室对ACMG-AMP变异解读指南的执行情况。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1067-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 May 12.
2
Patients' perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing for their healthcare: findings from the MedSeq project.患者对全基因组测序在其医疗保健中的感知效用:MedSeq项目的研究结果。
Per Med. 2016 Jan 1;13(1):13-20. doi: 10.2217/pme.15.45. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
3
Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.参与者和拒绝参加者对参与全基因组测序临床试验风险的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Feb;11(1):21-30. doi: 10.1177/1556264615624078. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
4
Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors.实体瘤患儿临床肿瘤和胚系全外显子测序的诊断率
JAMA Oncol. 2016 May 1;2(5):616-624. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5699.
5
Toward clinical genomics in everyday medicine: perspectives and recommendations.迈向日常医学中的临床基因组学:观点与建议。
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016;16(5):521-32. doi: 10.1586/14737159.2016.1146593. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
6
Assessing the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Genomic Sequencing.评估基因组测序的成本及成本效益
J Pers Med. 2015 Dec 10;5(4):470-86. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040470.
7
Comprehensive red blood cell and platelet antigen prediction from whole genome sequencing: proof of principle.基于全基因组测序的红细胞和血小板抗原综合预测:原理验证
Transfusion. 2016 Mar;56(3):743-54. doi: 10.1111/trf.13416. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
8
Germline Findings in Tumor-Only Sequencing: Points to Consider for Clinicians and Laboratories.仅肿瘤测序中的种系发现:临床医生和实验室需考虑的要点
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 20;108(4). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv351. Print 2016 Apr.
9
Is Whole-Exome Sequencing an Ethically Disruptive Technology? Perspectives of Pediatric Oncologists and Parents of Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors.全外显子组测序是一项具有伦理颠覆性的技术吗?小儿肿瘤学家及实体瘤患儿家长的观点。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Mar;63(3):511-5. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25815. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
10
International Policies on Sharing Genomic Research Results with Relatives: Approaches to Balancing Privacy with Access.与亲属分享基因组研究结果的国际政策:平衡隐私与获取的方法。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):576-93. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12301.

临床测序探索性研究联盟:加速基于证据的基因组医学实践。

Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.

作者信息

Green Robert C, Goddard Katrina A B, Jarvik Gail P, Amendola Laura M, Appelbaum Paul S, Berg Jonathan S, Bernhardt Barbara A, Biesecker Leslie G, Biswas Sawona, Blout Carrie L, Bowling Kevin M, Brothers Kyle B, Burke Wylie, Caga-Anan Charlisse F, Chinnaiyan Arul M, Chung Wendy K, Clayton Ellen W, Cooper Gregory M, East Kelly, Evans James P, Fullerton Stephanie M, Garraway Levi A, Garrett Jeremy R, Gray Stacy W, Henderson Gail E, Hindorff Lucia A, Holm Ingrid A, Lewis Michelle Huckaby, Hutter Carolyn M, Janne Pasi A, Joffe Steven, Kaufman David, Knoppers Bartha M, Koenig Barbara A, Krantz Ian D, Manolio Teri A, McCullough Laurence, McEwen Jean, McGuire Amy, Muzny Donna, Myers Richard M, Nickerson Deborah A, Ou Jeffrey, Parsons Donald W, Petersen Gloria M, Plon Sharon E, Rehm Heidi L, Roberts J Scott, Robinson Dan, Salama Joseph S, Scollon Sarah, Sharp Richard R, Shirts Brian, Spinner Nancy B, Tabor Holly K, Tarczy-Hornoch Peter, Veenstra David L, Wagle Nikhil, Weck Karen, Wilfond Benjamin S, Wilhelmsen Kirk, Wolf Susan M, Wynn Julia, Yu Joon-Ho

机构信息

Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA 02139, USA.

Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR 97227, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1051-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.011
PMID:27181682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4908179/
Abstract

Despite rapid technical progress and demonstrable effectiveness for some types of diagnosis and therapy, much remains to be learned about clinical genome and exome sequencing (CGES) and its role within the practice of medicine. The Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) consortium includes 18 extramural research projects, one National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project, and a coordinating center funded by the NHGRI and National Cancer Institute. The consortium is exploring analytic and clinical validity and utility, as well as the ethical, legal, and social implications of sequencing via multidisciplinary approaches; it has thus far recruited 5,577 participants across a spectrum of symptomatic and healthy children and adults by utilizing both germline and cancer sequencing. The CSER consortium is analyzing data and creating publically available procedures and tools related to participant preferences and consent, variant classification, disclosure and management of primary and secondary findings, health outcomes, and integration with electronic health records. Future research directions will refine measures of clinical utility of CGES in both germline and somatic testing, evaluate the use of CGES for screening in healthy individuals, explore the penetrance of pathogenic variants through extensive phenotyping, reduce discordances in public databases of genes and variants, examine social and ethnic disparities in the provision of genomics services, explore regulatory issues, and estimate the value and downstream costs of sequencing. The CSER consortium has established a shared community of research sites by using diverse approaches to pursue the evidence-based development of best practices in genomic medicine.

摘要

尽管技术进步迅速,且在某些类型的诊断和治疗中已证明具有有效性,但关于临床基因组和外显子组测序(CGES)及其在医学实践中的作用,仍有许多有待了解。临床测序探索性研究(CSER)联盟包括18个校外研究项目、1个国家人类基因组研究所(NHGRI)的校内项目,以及一个由NHGRI和国家癌症研究所资助的协调中心。该联盟正在通过多学科方法探索测序的分析和临床有效性及实用性,以及伦理、法律和社会影响;到目前为止,通过利用种系和癌症测序,已招募了5577名有症状和健康的儿童及成人参与者。CSER联盟正在分析数据,并创建与参与者偏好和同意、变异分类、一级和二级发现的披露与管理、健康结果以及与电子健康记录整合相关的公开可用程序和工具。未来的研究方向将完善CGES在种系和体细胞检测中的临床实用性测量方法,评估CGES在健康个体筛查中的应用,通过广泛的表型分析探索致病变异的外显率,减少基因和变异公共数据库中的不一致性,研究基因组学服务提供中的社会和种族差异,探索监管问题,并估计测序的价值和下游成本。CSER联盟通过采用多种方法,建立了一个研究站点共享社区,以追求基于证据的基因组医学最佳实践的发展。