Tanzer Dylan, Smith Karen, Tanzer Michael
D. Tanzer, K. Smith Jo Miller Orthopaedic Laboratory, McGill University, Montreal, Canada D. Tanzer Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel M. Tanzer Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):372-378. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000043.
The implementation of care pathways in hip arthroplasty programs has been shown to result in a decreased length of stay (LOS), but often multiple elements of a care pathway are implemented at the same time. As a result, it is difficult to understand the impact each of the individual modifications has made to the patient's prepathway care. In particular, it is unknown what the role of patient expectations pertaining to anticipated LOS alone is on the LOS after primary THA.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does changing the patient's expectations regarding his or her anticipated LOS, without intentionally changing the rest of the care pathway, result in a change in the patient's LOS after primary THA? (2) Is the resultant LOS associated with the patient's age, gender, or day of the week the surgery was performed?
We retrospectively compared the LOS in 100 consecutive patients undergoing THA immediately after the implementation of a 4-day care pathway (4-day Group) with 100 consecutive patients, 3 months later, who were also in the same pathway but were told by their surgeon preoperatively and in the hospital to expect a LOS of 2 days (2-day Group). Aside from reeducation by the surgeon, there was no difference in the surgery or intentional changes to the intraoperative or postoperative management of the two groups. Only the patient and the surgeon were made aware of the accelerated discharge plan. We compared the LOS between the two groups and the number of patients who met their discharge goal. As well, the ability to meet the discharge goal for each group was further determined based on age, gender, and day of the week the surgery was performed.
Overall, patients in the 2-day Group had a shorter LOS than those in the 4-day Group (2.9 ± 0.88 days versus 3.9 ± 1.71 days; mean difference 1 day; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-1.36; p = 0.001). In the 2-day Group, the LOS was 2 days in 32% compared with 8% in the 4-day Group (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.76-9.11; p < 0.001). Men in the 4-day Group had a shorter LOS than women (3.4 ± 1.22 days versus 4.2 ± 1.89 days; mean difference 0.8 days; 95% CI, 0.17-1.78; p = 0.019), but there was no difference in LOS by gender in the 2-day Group (2.8 ± 0.81 days versus 3.1 ± 0.93 days; mean difference 0.3 days; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.61; p = 0.219). For all patients > 40 years and < 90 years of age, a greater percentage of patients in the 2-day Group went home by postoperative day 2 than those in the 4-day Group (32% compared with 7%; odds ratio, 4.6; p < 0.001). In both groups, there was no difference in the LOS if the surgery was on Friday compared with an earlier day of the week (4-day Group: 3.4 ± 0.67 days versus 4.0 ± 1.80 days; p = 0.477 and 2-day Group: 2.8 ± 0.62 days versus 3.0 ± 0.93 days; p = 0.547).
We found that a surgeon who sets a clear expectation in terms of LOS could achieve a reduction in this parameter. Although it is impossible to be certain in the context of a retrospective study whether other caregivers adjusted the pathway in response to the surgeon's preferences, and we suspect this probably did occur, this still points to an opportunity on the topic of expectations setting that future studies should explore. This study highlights the influence patient education and expectations has on the effectiveness of care pathways in THA as well as the importance of continuous reinforcement of discharge planning both preoperatively and in the hospital.
Level III, therapeutic study.
髋关节置换项目中实施护理路径已被证明可缩短住院时间(LOS),但护理路径的多个要素通常是同时实施的。因此,很难理解每个单独的改变对患者术前护理产生了何种影响。特别是,仅患者对预期住院时间的期望在初次全髋关节置换术后住院时间方面的作用尚不清楚。
问题/目的:(1)在不刻意改变护理路径其他部分的情况下,改变患者对其预期住院时间的期望,是否会导致初次全髋关节置换术后患者的住院时间发生变化?(2)由此产生的住院时间是否与患者的年龄、性别或手术进行的星期几有关?
我们回顾性比较了在实施4天护理路径后立即接受全髋关节置换术的100例连续患者(4天组)与3个月后同样处于该护理路径但术前及在医院被外科医生告知预期住院时间为2天的100例连续患者(2天组)的住院时间。除了外科医生进行再教育外,两组手术或术中及术后管理方面没有差异。只有患者和外科医生知晓加速出院计划。我们比较了两组之间的住院时间以及达到出院目标的患者数量。此外,根据患者年龄、性别和手术进行的星期几进一步确定每组达到出院目标的能力。
总体而言,2天组患者的住院时间比4天组短(2.9±0.88天对3.9±1.71天;平均差异1天;95%置信区间[CI],0.60 - 1.36;p = 0.001)。在2天组中,32%的患者住院时间为2天,而4天组为8%(优势比,4.0;95%CI,1.76 - 9.11;p < 0.001)。4天组男性的住院时间比女性短(3.4±1.22天对4.2±1.89天;平均差异0.8天;95%CI,0.17 - 1.78;p = 0.019),但2天组中按性别划分的住院时间没有差异(分别为2.8±0.81天和3.1±0.93天;平均差异0.3天;95%CI, - 0.14至0.61;p = 0.219)。对于所有年龄大于40岁且小于90岁的患者,2天组中术后第2天出院的患者百分比高于4天组(32%对7%;优势比,4.6;p < 0.001)。在两组中,如果手术在周五进行与在一周中较早的日期进行相比,住院时间没有差异(4天组:3.4±0.67天对4.0±1.80天;p = 0.477;2天组:2.8±0.62天对3.0±0.93天;p = 0.547)。
我们发现,对外科医生而言,在住院时间方面设定明确的期望可以使该参数降低。尽管在回顾性研究的背景下无法确定其他护理人员是否根据外科医生的偏好调整了护理路径,而且我们怀疑这种情况可能确实发生了,但这仍然指出了期望设定这一主题上未来研究应探索的一个机会。本研究强调了患者教育和期望对全髋关节置换护理路径有效性的影响,以及术前和住院期间持续强化出院计划的重要性。
III级,治疗性研究。