Connolly Samantha L, Alloy Lauren B
Department of Psychology, Temple University, 1701 North 13 Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6(1):32-47. doi: 10.1177/2167702617729487. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
The current research utilized ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology to test the hypotheses that: 1) engaging in greater rumination following stress (stress-reactive rumination; SRR) would lead to improved stressor recall, and 2) this improved memory for stress would predict increases in depressive symptoms. One hundred twenty-one participants received smartphone alerts in which they reported on their experience of negative life events (NLEs) as well as SRR and depressed mood after event occurrence. NLEs followed by increased SRR were more likely to be recalled two weeks later. Furthermore, individuals who endorsed and recalled more stressors displayed increased depressive symptoms. Contrary to hypotheses, no evidence was found for a mediational effect in which SRR predicted depressive symptoms and was mediated by memory for NLEs. Current findings demonstrate a relationship between rumination following stress and the subsequent recall of those stressors, and support the role of negative event recall as a vulnerability factor for depression.
当前的研究采用了生态瞬时评估(EMA)方法来检验以下假设:1)在压力后进行更多的沉思(压力反应性沉思;SRR)会导致对应激源的回忆改善,以及2)这种对压力的记忆改善会预测抑郁症状的增加。121名参与者收到智能手机提醒,他们要报告自己经历负面生活事件(NLEs)的情况,以及事件发生后的SRR和抑郁情绪。事件发生后SRR增加的NLEs在两周后更有可能被回忆起来。此外,认可并回忆起更多应激源的个体表现出抑郁症状增加。与假设相反,没有发现SRR预测抑郁症状并由对NLEs的记忆介导的中介效应的证据。当前的研究结果表明压力后的沉思与随后对应激源的回忆之间存在关联,并支持负面事件回忆作为抑郁症易感性因素的作用。