University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
German Pension Insurance Oldenburg-Bremen, Schwachhauser Heerstr. 32-34, 28209, Bremen, Germany.
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2007-2017. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1836-1. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
There is a global increase in chronic, degenerative illnesses that require long-term intervention and support as a result of the aging population. The majority of support needs are met by informal family caregivers. While there have been three decades of research focusing on caregivers in general, the extent to which research has focused on Indigenous caregivers is unclear. Worldwide, Indigenous peoples face severe economic and health disadvantages that may make them even more vulnerable to the negative aspects of informal caregiving. The current systematic review aimed to synthesize the extant literature on Indigenous caregiver functioning and the interventions that are efficacious in alleviating Indigenous caregiver distress.
Systematic review Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed quantitative studies examining Indigenous caregiver functioning or evaluating Indigenous caregiver interventions.
1172 unique records were located in the final search undertaken; only 7 articles, representing 6 unique studies, met the full inclusion criteria. Most studies contained numerous methodological weaknesses that compromised the reliability and validity of findings. Available studies suggest poor health and high burden among Indigenous relative to non-Indigenous caregivers. However, high levels of positive aspects of caregiving were reported in one study. A single intervention study suggests that poor health outcomes among Indigenous caregivers can be alleviated, though the quality and focus of this study was sub-optimal.
Overall, there is very little quality evidence around Indigenous caregiver functioning. Future research in this area would benefit from greater adherence to the standards of research that contribute to a strong and reliable evidence base.
由于人口老龄化,全球范围内慢性退行性疾病的发病率不断上升,这些疾病需要长期的干预和支持。大部分的支持需求都是由非正规的家庭护理人员来满足的。虽然已经有三十年的研究关注一般的护理人员,但针对原住民护理人员的研究程度尚不清楚。在全球范围内,原住民面临着严重的经济和健康劣势,这可能使他们更容易受到非正式护理的负面影响。目前的系统综述旨在综合现有的关于原住民护理人员功能以及减轻原住民护理人员压力的有效干预措施的文献。
系统综述的纳入标准是对原住民护理人员功能进行评估或评估原住民护理人员干预措施的同行评审的定量研究。
在最后一次搜索中找到了 1172 条独特的记录;只有 7 篇文章,代表 6 项独特的研究,符合全部纳入标准。大多数研究都存在许多方法学上的弱点,影响了研究结果的可靠性和有效性。现有的研究表明,与非原住民护理人员相比,原住民护理人员的健康状况较差,负担较重。然而,在一项研究中报告了较高水平的积极护理方面。一项单一的干预研究表明,原住民护理人员的健康状况不佳可以得到缓解,尽管这项研究的质量和重点并不理想。
总体而言,关于原住民护理人员功能的高质量证据非常有限。该领域的未来研究将受益于更好地遵守有助于建立强大可靠证据基础的研究标准。