Fonseca Ana Gloria, Torgal Jorge, de Meneghi Daniele, Gabriël Sarah, Coelho Ana Cláudia, Vilhena Manuela
Public Health Department, NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy.
Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 13;6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074. eCollection 2018.
The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals, and the environment. The Network for Evaluation of One Health (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Health-ness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of intersectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH Initiative (drivers and expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, and stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this Initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were as follows: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50; and systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the Initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing an OH-oriented perspective.
人类囊尾蚴病作为一种被忽视的人畜共患病,其发病率不断上升,正在挑战传统的预防和控制模式,并促使工业化国家寻求“同一健康”(OH)解决方案。用于健康干预的OH解决方案正越来越多地被用于获取涉及人类、动物和环境的预期和意外结果。“同一健康”评估网络(NEOH)提出了一个基于证据的框架,依靠系统和混合方法来评估“同一健康”程度。在本案例研究中,该工具被用于评估葡萄牙猪带绦虫病和囊尾蚴病监测站的设计,作为跨部门监测合作的一个实例。描述了OH倡议(驱动因素和预期结果)及其系统(边界、目标、维度、行为者和利益相关者)。该倡议的不同方面根据从0(=无OH方法)到1(=完美OH方法)的值进行评分。OH指数为0.31。其OH比率为1.98。总体得分如下:OH思维0.75;OH规划0.60;OH工作0.60;OH共享0.35;OH学习0.50;系统组织0.50。该倡议的运营层面是主要优势,表明采用了全面的多维创新方法和跨学科方法。观察到支持基础设施中存在关键问题,与项目中的沟通、学习和组织差距有关,评估是在项目设计和实施过程中进行的。检测到的优势和劣势可用于完善该倡议。因此,本案例研究也为正在进行的项目在设计和早期实施阶段的OH评估提供了范例并提供了支持,以指导和确保以OH为导向的视角。