• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙囊尾蚴病监测设计的“同一健康”评估

One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal.

作者信息

Fonseca Ana Gloria, Torgal Jorge, de Meneghi Daniele, Gabriël Sarah, Coelho Ana Cláudia, Vilhena Manuela

机构信息

Public Health Department, NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.

Department of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 13;6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074
PMID:29594095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859019/
Abstract

The increasing occurrence of human cysticercosis, a zoonotic neglected disease, is challenging the traditional prevention and control paradigm and calling for One Health (OH) solutions in industrialized countries. OH solutions for health interventions are increasingly being used to capture expected and unexpected outcomes across people, animals, and the environment. The Network for Evaluation of One Health (NEOH) proposes an evidence-based framework, relying on systems and mixed methods approaches to evaluate the One Health-ness. In this case study, this tool is used to evaluate the design of the Observatory of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis, as an example of intersectorial collaboration for surveillance in Portugal. The OH Initiative (drivers and expected outcomes) and its system (boundaries, aim, dimensions, actors, and stakeholders) were described. The different aspects of this Initiative were scored with values from 0 (=no OH approach) to 1 (=perfect OH approach). The OH index was 0.31. Its OH ratio is 1.98. Overall scores were as follows: OH thinking 0.75; OH planning 0.60; OH working 0.60; OH sharing 0.35; OH learning 0.50; and systemic organization 0.50. Operational levels of the Initiative are the main strengths, indicating a comprehensive multidimensional innovative approach and transdisciplinarity. Critical issues in the supporting infrastructure were observed, related to communication, learning and organizational gaps in the project, with the evaluation being conducted as the project is being designed and implemented. The strengths and weaknesses detected may be used to refine the Initiative. This case study therefore exemplifies and supports OH assessment also for ongoing projects, at design and early implementation stages for guiding and guaranteeing an OH-oriented perspective.

摘要

人类囊尾蚴病作为一种被忽视的人畜共患病,其发病率不断上升,正在挑战传统的预防和控制模式,并促使工业化国家寻求“同一健康”(OH)解决方案。用于健康干预的OH解决方案正越来越多地被用于获取涉及人类、动物和环境的预期和意外结果。“同一健康”评估网络(NEOH)提出了一个基于证据的框架,依靠系统和混合方法来评估“同一健康”程度。在本案例研究中,该工具被用于评估葡萄牙猪带绦虫病和囊尾蚴病监测站的设计,作为跨部门监测合作的一个实例。描述了OH倡议(驱动因素和预期结果)及其系统(边界、目标、维度、行为者和利益相关者)。该倡议的不同方面根据从0(=无OH方法)到1(=完美OH方法)的值进行评分。OH指数为0.31。其OH比率为1.98。总体得分如下:OH思维0.75;OH规划0.60;OH工作0.60;OH共享0.35;OH学习0.50;系统组织0.50。该倡议的运营层面是主要优势,表明采用了全面的多维创新方法和跨学科方法。观察到支持基础设施中存在关键问题,与项目中的沟通、学习和组织差距有关,评估是在项目设计和实施过程中进行的。检测到的优势和劣势可用于完善该倡议。因此,本案例研究也为正在进行的项目在设计和早期实施阶段的OH评估提供了范例并提供了支持,以指导和确保以OH为导向的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/5859019/123873716c06/fpubh-06-00074-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/5859019/30d1db65d57b/fpubh-06-00074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/5859019/123873716c06/fpubh-06-00074-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/5859019/30d1db65d57b/fpubh-06-00074-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afd3/5859019/123873716c06/fpubh-06-00074-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
One Health-ness Evaluation of Cysticercosis Surveillance Design in Portugal.葡萄牙囊尾蚴病监测设计的“同一健康”评估
Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 13;6:74. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00074. eCollection 2018.
2
The Degree of One Health Implementation in the West Nile Virus Integrated Surveillance in Northern Italy, 2016.2016年意大利北部西尼罗河病毒综合监测中“同一健康”理念的实施程度
Front Public Health. 2017 Sep 5;5:236. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00236. eCollection 2017.
3
Effectiveness of One Health approach for control of Kyasanur Forest Disease in Wayanad, Kerala, India.印度喀拉拉邦韦恩纳德地区“One Health”方法控制基萨努尔森林病的效果。
J Vector Borne Dis. 2022 Jan-Mar;59(1):70-78. doi: 10.4103/0972-9062.331407.
4
Application of the NEOH Framework for Self-Evaluation of One Health Elements of a Case-Study on Obesity in European Dogs and Dog-Owners.NEOH框架在欧洲犬类和犬主肥胖案例研究的“同一健康”要素自我评估中的应用。
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jul 20;5:163. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00163. eCollection 2018.
5
A One Health Evaluation of the Southern African Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance.对南部非洲传染病监测中心的“同一健康”评估。
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Mar 16;5:33. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00033. eCollection 2018.
6
One Health Evaluation: A Case Study at the University of Bologna.One Health 评估:博洛尼亚大学案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;9:661490. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.661490. eCollection 2021.
7
A Systems Approach to Evaluate One Health Initiatives.一种评估“同一个健康”倡议的系统方法。
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Mar 9;5:23. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00023. eCollection 2018.
8
Control of Cattle Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases by Acaricide in Southern Province of Zambia: A Retrospective Evaluation of Animal Health Measures According to Current One Health Concepts.赞比亚南部省份使用杀螨剂控制牛蜱及蜱传疾病:基于当前“同一健康”概念对动物卫生措施的回顾性评估
Front Public Health. 2018 Mar 27;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00045. eCollection 2018.
9
Positioning Animal Welfare in the One Health Concept through Evaluation of an Animal Welfare Center in Skopje, Macedonia.通过对马其顿斯科普里一家动物福利中心的评估,将动物福利置于“同一健康”概念之中。
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Jan 10;4:238. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00238. eCollection 2017.
10
Implementation of One Health surveillance systems: Opportunities and challenges - lessons learned from the OH-EpiCap application.“同一个健康”监测系统的实施:机遇与挑战——从“同一个健康”疫情应对能力建设项目应用中吸取的经验教训
One Health. 2024 Mar 6;18:100704. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100704. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology.适用于“同一健康”监测系统的评估工具的系统评价:呼吁采用适应性方法。
One Health. 2025 Feb 14;20:100995. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.100995. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
One Health Evaluation: A Case Study at the University of Bologna.One Health 评估:博洛尼亚大学案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;9:661490. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.661490. eCollection 2021.
3
System Thinking and Citizen Participation Is Still Missing in One Health Initiatives - Lessons From Fifteen Evaluations.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systems Approach to Evaluate One Health Initiatives.一种评估“同一个健康”倡议的系统方法。
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Mar 9;5:23. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00023. eCollection 2018.
2
A Blueprint to Evaluate One Health.一份评估“同一健康”的蓝图。
Front Public Health. 2017 Feb 16;5:20. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00020. eCollection 2017.
3
Human cysticercosis in Portugal: long gone or still contemporary?葡萄牙的人体囊尾蚴病:早已消失还是仍然存在?
“同一健康”倡议仍缺乏系统思维和公民参与——来自十五项评估的经验教训
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;9:653398. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653398. eCollection 2021.
4
Quantitatively evaluating the cross-sectoral and One Health impact of interventions: A scoping review and case study of antimicrobial resistance.定量评估干预措施的跨部门和“同一个健康”影响:抗菌药物耐药性的范围审查和案例研究
One Health. 2020 Nov 14;11:100194. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100194. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Currently Available Monitoring and Surveillance Systems for spp., spp., spp., and Soil-Transmitted Helminths at the Control/Elimination Stage: A Systematic Review.控制/消除阶段针对[物种名称1]、[物种名称2]、[物种名称3]和土源性蠕虫的现有监测与 surveillance 系统:一项系统评价。 (注:原文中“spp.”未明确写出具体物种名称,这里保留英文表述;“surveillance”未翻译,因为你要求不要添加其他解释说明,不确定其在特定语境下准确意思,若有准确物种信息及“surveillance”准确释义需求,可进一步完善翻译。)
Pathogens. 2020 Jan 6;9(1):47. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9010047.
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Jan;145(2):329-333. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002284. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
4
One Health: competing perspectives in an emerging field.“同一健康”:新兴领域中的不同观点。
Parasitology. 2017 Jan;144(1):7-14. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015001845. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
The Influence of Socio-economic, Behavioural and Environmental Factors on Taenia spp. Transmission in Western Kenya: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Survey in Humans and Pigs.社会经济、行为和环境因素对肯尼亚西部带绦虫属传播的影响:来自人类和猪的横断面调查证据
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Dec 7;9(12):e0004223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004223. eCollection 2015 Dec.
6
Taenia solium in Europe: Still endemic?欧洲的猪带绦虫:仍然是地方病吗?
Acta Trop. 2017 Jan;165:96-99. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
7
Epidemiology and management of cysticercosis and Taenia solium taeniasis in Europe, systematic review 1990-2011.欧洲囊虫病和猪带绦虫感染的流行病学和管理:1990-2011 年系统综述
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069537. Print 2013.
8
Neurocysticercosis in Europe: Still a public health concern not only for imported cases.欧洲的神经囊虫病:不仅是输入性病例,仍是公共卫生关注点。
Acta Trop. 2013 Oct;128(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
9
Neurocysticercosis in Western Europe: a re-emerging disease?西欧的神经囊虫病:一种再现的疾病?
Acta Neurol Belg. 2012 Dec;112(4):335-43. doi: 10.1007/s13760-012-0068-3. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
10
Taenia solium cysticercosis hotspots surrounding tapeworm carriers: clustering on human seroprevalence but not on seizures.猪带绦虫囊尾蚴病热点区围绕绦虫携带者:聚集在人体血清阳性率上,而不在癫痫发作上。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(1):e371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000371. Epub 2009 Jan 27.