Stanifer John W, Von Isenburg Megan, Chertow Glenn M, Anand Shuchi
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Apr 1;3(2):e000728. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000728. eCollection 2018.
The number of persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) living in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is increasing rapidly; yet systems built to care for them have received little attention. In order to inform the development of scalable CKD care models, we conducted a systematic review to characterise existing CKD care models in LMICs.
We searched PubMed, Embase and WHO Global Health Library databases for published reports of CKD care models from LMICs between January 2000 and 31 October 2017. We used a combination of database-specific medical subject headings and keywords for care models, CKD and LMICs as defined by the World Bank.
Of 3367 retrieved articles, we reviewed the full text of 104 and identified 17 articles describing 16 programmes from 10 countries for inclusion. National efforts (n=4) focused on the prevention of end-stage renal disease through enhanced screening, public awareness campaigns and education for primary care providers. Of the 12 clinical care models, nine focused on persons with CKD and the remaining on persons at risk for CKD; a majority in the first category implemented a multidisciplinary clinic with allied health professionals or primary care providers (rather than nephrologists) in lead roles. Four clinical care models used a randomised control design allowing for assessment of programme effectiveness, but only one was assessed as having low risk for bias; all four showed significant attenuation of kidney function decline in the intervention arms.
Overall, very few rigorous CKD care models have been reported from LMICs. While preliminary data indicate that national efforts or clinical CKD care models bolstering primary care are successful in slowing kidney function decline, limited data on regional causes of CKD to inform national campaigns, and on effectiveness and affordability of local programmes represent important challenges to scalability.
生活在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者数量正在迅速增加;然而,为照顾这些患者而建立的系统却很少受到关注。为了为可扩展的CKD护理模式的发展提供信息,我们进行了一项系统综述,以描述LMIC中现有的CKD护理模式。
我们在PubMed、Embase和世界卫生组织全球卫生图书馆数据库中搜索了2000年1月至2017年10月31日期间来自LMIC的CKD护理模式的已发表报告。我们结合了特定数据库的医学主题词和世界银行定义的护理模式、CKD和LMIC的关键词。
在检索到的3367篇文章中,我们对104篇文章的全文进行了综述,并确定了17篇文章,描述了来自10个国家的16个项目以纳入研究。国家层面的努力(n = 4)侧重于通过加强筛查、公众宣传活动以及对初级保健提供者的教育来预防终末期肾病。在12种临床护理模式中,9种侧重于CKD患者,其余侧重于CKD高危人群;第一类中的大多数实施了以联合健康专业人员或初级保健提供者(而非肾病学家)为主导的多学科诊所。四种临床护理模式采用了随机对照设计,可对项目效果进行评估,但只有一种被评估为偏倚风险较低;所有四种模式在干预组中均显示出肾功能下降的显著减缓。
总体而言,LMIC报告的严格CKD护理模式非常少。虽然初步数据表明,国家层面的努力或加强初级保健的临床CKD护理模式在减缓肾功能下降方面是成功的,但关于为国家宣传活动提供信息的CKD区域病因以及地方项目的有效性和可负担性的有限数据,是可扩展性面临的重要挑战。