• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Creating energy citizenship through material participation.通过实际参与塑造能源公民身份。
Soc Stud Sci. 2018 Apr;48(2):283-303. doi: 10.1177/0306312718770286. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
2
[Evaluation of a citizenship-oriented intervention: The Citizens' Project of the University of Recovery].[一项以公民身份为导向的干预措施评估:康复大学公民项目]
Sante Ment Que. 2017 Spring;42(1):205-222.
3
[The challenges of citizenship and participation in the health systems].[公民身份与参与卫生系统面临的挑战]
Cien Saude Colet. 2014 Dec;19(12):4829-39. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320141912.02292013.
4
Redesigning the architecture of policy-making: Engaging with Māori on nanotechnology in New Zealand.重新设计决策架构:新西兰就纳米技术与毛利人展开合作。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Apr;25(3):287-302. doi: 10.1177/0963662514548629. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
5
Participatory citizenship: Critical perspectives on client-centred occupational therapy.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2015 Jul;22(4):260-6. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2015.1020338. Epub 2015 May 4.
6
Italian parliamentary debates on energy sustainability: How argumentative 'short-circuits' affect public engagement.意大利议会关于能源可持续性的辩论:论证性“短路”如何影响公众参与。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Aug;25(6):737-53. doi: 10.1177/0963662515580067. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
The rights and responsibilities of citizenship for service users: some terms and conditions apply.服务使用者作为公民的权利和责任:适用某些条款和条件。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Nov;22(9):698-705. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12258. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
8
Scientific citizenship in a democratic society.科学公民在民主社会中的角色。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):927-40. doi: 10.1177/0963662512449598. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
9
Spaces for Citizen Involvement in Healthcare: An Ethnographic Study.公民参与医疗保健的空间:一项人种志研究。
Sociology. 2015 Jun;49(3):488-504. doi: 10.1177/0038038514544208.
10
The Cultivation of Digital Health Citizenship.数字健康公民的培养。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113675. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113675. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
How policies and actor strategies affect electric vehicle diffusion and wider sustainability transitions.政策和行为主体策略如何影响电动汽车的普及以及更广泛的可持续发展转型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 21;120(47):e2207888119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2207888119. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
2
Understanding the role of digitalization and social media on energy citizenship.理解数字化和社交媒体在能源公民意识方面的作用。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Jan 10;3:6. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15267.1. eCollection 2023.
3
Exploring energy citizenship in the urban heating system with the 'Walking with Energy' methodology.运用“与能源同行”方法探索城市供热系统中的能源公民身份。
Energy Sustain Soc. 2023;13(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13705-023-00393-5. Epub 2023 May 15.
4
EU climate action through an energy poverty lens.从能源贫困角度看欧盟的气候行动。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 13;13(1):6040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32705-2.
5
An agenda for future Social Sciences and Humanities research on energy efficiency: 100 priority research questions.未来社会科学与人文科学能源效率研究议程:100个优先研究问题。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):223. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01243-z. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
6
Between stability and change: Tensions in the Norwegian electric mobility transition.在稳定与变革之间:挪威电动交通转型中的紧张关系。
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Dec;51(6):895-913. doi: 10.1177/03063127211022842. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Welcoming Wind Turbines and the PIMBY ("Please in My Backyard") Phenomenon: The Culture of the Machine in the Rural American Midwest.欢迎风力涡轮机与“别在我家后院”(NIMBY)现象:美国中西部乡村的机器文化
Technol Cult. 2017;58(2):335-367. doi: 10.1353/tech.2017.0039.
2
Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change.订购理论:社会技术变革的类型学和概念框架。
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Oct;47(5):703-750. doi: 10.1177/0306312717709363. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
3
Creating a national citizen engagement process for energy policy.为能源政策创建一个全国公民参与流程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13606-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317512111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
4
A mirror for science.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):21-6. doi: 10.1177/0963662513505509.
5
Why should we promote public engagement with science?我们为什么要促进公众参与科学?
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):4-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154.
6
How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.科学家如何看待公众、媒体和政治进程。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Aug;22(6):644-59. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418743. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
7
Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science--hitting the notes, but missing the music?公众参与作为恢复公众对科学信任的一种手段——是找准了音调,却没抓住旋律?
Community Genet. 2006;9(3):211-20. doi: 10.1159/000092659.

通过实际参与塑造能源公民身份。

Creating energy citizenship through material participation.

作者信息

Ryghaug Marianne, Skjølsvold Tomas Moe, Heidenreich Sara

机构信息

Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Centre for Technology and Society, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 2018 Apr;48(2):283-303. doi: 10.1177/0306312718770286. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1177/0306312718770286
PMID:29648504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5977452/
Abstract

Transitions towards low-carbon energy systems will be comprehensive and demanding, requiring substantial public support. One important contribution from STS is to highlight the roles of citizens and public engagement. Until recently, energy users have often been treated as customers and passive market actors, or as recipients of technology at the margins of centralized systems. With respect to the latter role, critical or hesitant public action has been explained in terms of NIMBYism and knowledge deficits. This article focuses on the production of energy citizenship when considering public participation in low-carbon energy transitions. We draw upon the theory of 'material participation' to highlight how introducing and using emergent energy technologies may create new energy practices. We analyze an ongoing introduction of new material objects, highlighting the way these technologies can be seen as material interventions co-constructing temporalities of new and sustainable practices. We argue that artefacts such as the electric car, the smart meter and photovoltaic panels may become objects of participation and engagement, and that the introduction of such technologies may foster material participation and energy citizenship. The paper concludes with a discussion about the role of policies for low-carbon energy transitions on the making of energy citizenship, as well as limits of introducing a materially based energy citizenship.

摘要

向低碳能源系统的转型将是全面且艰巨的,需要大量的公共支持。科学技术与社会(STS)的一项重要贡献是突出公民的角色和公众参与。直到最近,能源用户通常被视为消费者和被动的市场参与者,或者是集中式系统边缘的技术接受者。关于后一种角色,关键的或犹豫的公众行动一直被用邻避主义和知识缺陷来解释。本文在考虑公众参与低碳能源转型时聚焦于能源公民身份的形成。我们借鉴“物质参与”理论来突出引入和使用新兴能源技术如何可能创造新的能源实践。我们分析正在进行的新材料对象的引入,强调这些技术如何可被视为共同构建新的可持续实践的时间性的物质干预。我们认为电动汽车、智能电表和光伏板等人工制品可能成为参与和互动的对象,并且引入此类技术可能促进物质参与和能源公民身份。本文最后讨论了低碳能源转型政策在能源公民身份形成中的作用,以及引入基于物质的能源公民身份的局限性。