• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Mapping European Welfare Models: State of the Art of Strategies for Professional Integration and Reintegration of Persons with Chronic Diseases.绘制欧洲福利模式图:慢性病患者专业融入和再融入策略的最新进展。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 17;15(4):781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040781.
2
Difficult entry and return to the labor market: on the professional (re)integration of people with disabilities and chronic health conditions in Poland (The PATHWAYS research project).难以重返劳动力市场:波兰残疾人和慢性病患者的职业(再)融入问题研究(PATHWAYS 研究项目)。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019 Jul 15;32(4):475-488. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01352.
3
Policy Guidelines for Effective Inclusion and Reintegration of People with Chronic Diseases in the Workplace: National and European Perspectives.有效纳入和重新融入慢性病患者的政策指南:国家和欧洲视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 11;15(3):493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030493.
4
How do macro-level contexts and policies affect the employment chances of chronically ill and disabled people? Part II: The impact of active and passive labor market policies.宏观层面的环境和政策如何影响慢性病和残疾人的就业机会?第二部分:积极和被动劳动力市场政策的影响。
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(3):415-30. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.3.b.
5
Challenges for the labor market: 2 complementary approaches to premature cessation of occupational activity.劳动力市场面临的挑战:过早停止职业活动的 2 种互补方法。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019 Oct 16;32(5):695-721. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01350. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
Identifying the Employment Needs of People With Chronic Health Conditions in Europe.识别欧洲慢性病患者的就业需求。
J Occup Environ Med. 2018 Nov;60(11):e618-e624. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001425.
7
Precarious employment and mental health across European welfare states: a gender perspective.不稳定性就业与欧洲福利国家的心理健康:一个性别视角。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Sep;95(7):1463-1480. doi: 10.1007/s00420-022-01839-7. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
8
Are pro-welfare state and full-employment policies possible in the era of globalization?在全球化时代,有利于福利国家和充分就业的政策是否可行?
Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(2):231-51. doi: 10.2190/HXU0-A9D9-AC7C-3WY1.
9
Examining the relevance of employment integration policies on disability benefit receipt: a multilevel analysis of older working age adults in 16 countries.考察就业融合政策对残疾津贴领取的相关性:16 个国家中老年劳动力的多层次分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(23):3339-3347. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1593521. Epub 2019 Apr 21.
10
What Persons with Chronic Health Conditions Need to Maintain or Return to Work-Results of an Online-Survey in Seven European Countries.患有慢性健康状况的人需要维持或重返工作岗位的条件——七个欧洲国家在线调查的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 26;15(4):595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040595.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic health conditions and their impact on the labor market. A cross-country comparison in Europe.慢性健康状况及其对劳动力市场的影响。欧洲的跨国比较。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Apr 4;26:101666. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101666. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Sociodemographic and morbidity characteristics of people on long-term sick leave.长期病假人员的社会人口学和发病特征。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):2249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14665-w.
3
Understanding the Economic Value and Impacts on Informal Carers of People Living with Mental Health Conditions.理解经济价值和对精神健康状况患者的非正式照顾者的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 1;19(5):2858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052858.
4
BPM Support for Patient-Centred Clinical Pathways in Chronic Diseases.以患者为中心的慢性病临床路径中的 BPM 支持。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 6;21(21):7383. doi: 10.3390/s21217383.
5
Evaluation of the Community Pharmacy Comorbidities Screening Service on Patients with Chronic Diseases.社区药房对慢性病患者共病筛查服务的评估
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jul 17;15:1611-1619. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S312341. eCollection 2021.
6
Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: A systematic review.远程症状监测与电子健康记录的整合:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1752-1763. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa177.
7
Employment and Chronic Diseases: Suggested Actions for The Implementation of Inclusive Policies for The Participation of People with Chronic Diseases in the Labour Market.就业与慢性病:实施包容政策以促进慢性病患者参与劳动力市场的建议行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 28;17(3):820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030820.
8
Employment and People with Non Communicable Chronic Diseases: PATHWAYS Recommendations and Suggested Actions for Implementing an Inclusive Labour Market for All and Health in All Sectors.就业与非传染性慢性病患者:实现全民包容型劳动力市场及各部门健康的途径建议与行动建议
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 7;15(8):1674. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081674.
9
Views and Experiences of Persons with Chronic Diseases about Strategies that Aim to Integrate and Re-Integrate Them into Work: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.慢性病患者对旨在整合和重新整合他们进入工作的策略的看法和经验:定性研究的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 18;15(5):1022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051022.
10
Furthering the Evidence of the Effectiveness of Employment Strategies for People with Mental Disorders in Europe: A Systematic Review.进一步证明欧洲精神障碍患者就业策略的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 24;15(5):838. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050838.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Integration and Re-Integration into Work Strategies for Persons with Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Review of European Strategies.慢性病患者融入和再融入工作策略的有效性:欧洲策略的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 19;15(3):552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030552.
2
Measuring global health: motivation and evolution of the Global Burden of Disease Study.衡量全球健康:全球疾病负担研究的动机与演变
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1460-1464. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32367-X.
3
Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、地区和国家残疾调整生命年(DALYs)用于 333 种疾病和伤害以及 195 个国家和地区的健康期望寿命(HALE),1990-2016 年:全球疾病负担研究 2016 年的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1260-1344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32130-X.
4
Associations between chronic conditions, body functions, activity limitations and participation restrictions: a cross-sectional approach in Spanish non-clinical populations.慢性病、身体功能、活动受限与参与限制之间的关联:西班牙非临床人群的横断面研究方法。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 14;6(6):e010446. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010446.
5
Social mobility and health in European countries: Does welfare regime type matter?社会流动与欧洲国家的健康:福利制度类型是否重要?
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;142:241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
6
The use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to understand the health and functioning experiences of people with chronic conditions from the person perspective: a systematic review.从个人角度使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》来理解慢性病患者的健康和功能体验:一项系统综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):655-66. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.935875. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
7
Influence of poor health on exit from paid employment: a systematic review.不良健康状况对退出有酬工作的影响:系统评价。
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;71(4):295-301. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101591. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
8
The influence of re-employment on quality of life and self-rated health, a longitudinal study among unemployed persons in the Netherlands.再就业对生活质量和自评健康的影响:荷兰失业者的纵向研究
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 24;13:503. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-503.
9
Social inequalities in "sickness": does welfare state regime type make a difference? A multilevel analysis of men and women in 26 European countries.社会不平等与“疾病”:福利国家体制类型有影响吗?对 26 个欧洲国家的男性和女性的多层次分析。
Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(2):235-55. doi: 10.2190/HS.42.2.f.
10
The effect of re-employment on perceived health.再就业对感知健康的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jul;65(7):639-44. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.103838. Epub 2010 Aug 30.

绘制欧洲福利模式图:慢性病患者专业融入和再融入策略的最新进展。

Mapping European Welfare Models: State of the Art of Strategies for Professional Integration and Reintegration of Persons with Chronic Diseases.

机构信息

Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and CIBER of Mental Health (CIBERSAM), 28028 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 17;15(4):781. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040781.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15040781
PMID:29673231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5923823/
Abstract

Persons with chronic diseases (PwCDs) often experience work-related problems, and innovative actions to improve their participation in the labor market are needed. In the frame of the European (EU) Pathways Project, the aim of the study is to compare existing strategies (policies, systems, and services) for professional (re-)integration of PwCDs and mental health conditions available at both European and national level between different European welfare models: Scandinavian, Continental, Anglo-Saxon, Mediterranean, and “Post-Communist”. : The European strategies were identified by an overview of relevant academic and grey literature searched through Medline and internet searches, while national strategies were explored through questionnaires and in-depth interviews with national relevant stakeholders. : The mapping of existing strategies revealed that, both at European and national level, PwCDs are often considered as part of the group of “persons with disabilities” and only in this case they can receive employment support. European countries put in place actions to support greater labor market participation, but these differ from country to country. : Strategies targeting “persons with disabilities” do not necessarily address all the needs of persons with chronic diseases. Countries should consider the importance of employment for all to achieve smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth.

摘要

慢性病患者(PwCD)经常会遇到与工作相关的问题,因此需要采取创新措施来改善他们参与劳动力市场的情况。在欧洲(EU)Pathways 项目的框架内,这项研究的目的是比较欧洲不同福利模式下(斯堪的纳维亚、大陆、盎格鲁-撒克逊、地中海和“后共产主义”)现有的专业(再)融入策略(政策、系统和服务)和针对 PwCD 及心理健康状况的策略:通过 Medline 和互联网搜索,对相关学术和灰色文献进行综述,确定了欧洲的策略,而国家策略则通过问卷和对国家相关利益攸关方的深入访谈进行了探讨。对现有策略的映射表明,无论是在欧洲层面还是在国家层面,慢性病患者通常都被视为“残疾人”群体的一部分,只有在这种情况下,他们才能获得就业支持。欧洲国家已经采取了行动来支持更大程度地参与劳动力市场,但各国的情况有所不同。针对“残疾人”的策略并不一定能满足慢性病患者的所有需求。各国应考虑到就业对所有人的重要性,以实现智慧、可持续和包容性增长。