Suppr超能文献

WeCareAdvisor™ 对痴呆症家庭照顾者结局的影响:一项试点随机对照试验。

Effect of the WeCareAdvisor™ on family caregiver outcomes in dementia: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Program for Positive Aging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Road, Box 5765, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Department of Veterans Affairs, HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 10;18(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0801-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are universal and associated with multiple negative outcomes. This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effect of using the WeCareAdvisor, an innovative web-based tool developed to enable family caregivers to assess, manage, and track BPSD.

METHODS

This RCT enrolled 57 dementia family caregivers from community and clinical settings in Ann Arbor, Michigan and Baltimore, Maryland. Participants were randomly assigned to immediate use of the WeCareAdvisor tool (WCA, n = 27) or a Waitlist control group (n = 30) that received the tool after a one-month waiting period. Outcomes for the caregiver and the person they were caring for were assessed at baseline (T0) and one-month followup for both the WCA (T1) and Waitlist control (T2) groups.

RESULTS

Caregiver mean age was 65.9 ± 14.0 years old. About half (49%) were spouses. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for mean caregiver confidence which was higher in the control group (WCA 35.0 ± 10.0 vs. Waitlist control 39.7 ± 6.9, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the WCA and control groups in characteristics of the person with dementia. After their one-month of tool use (T1), WCA caregivers showed significant within group improvement in caregiver distress (- 6.08 ± 6.31 points, t = - 4.82, p < 0.0001) and behavioral frequency (- 3.60 ± 5.05, t = - 3.56, p = 0.002), severity (- 3.24 ± 3.87, t = - 4.19, p = 0.0003) and total behavioral score (- 6.80 ± 10.73, t = - 3.17, p = 004). In the same timeframe, Waitlist control caregivers showed a significant decrease in confidence (- 6.40 ± 10.30, t = - 3.40, p = 0.002). The WCA group showed greater improvement in distress compared to the Waitlist group (T0-T1; t = - 2.49, p = 0.02), which remained significant after adjusting for site and baseline distress. There were no significant between-group differences in caregiver confidence or other secondary outcomes. After their one month of tool use (T2), the Waitlist group also showed significant improvement in caregiver distress (- 3.72 ± 7.53, t = - 2.66, p = 0.013), stress (- 0.41 ± 1.02, t = - 2.19, p = 0.037), confidence (4.38 ± 5.17, t = 4.56, p < 0.0001), burden (- 2.76 ± 7.26, t = - 2.05, p = 0.05), negative communication (- 1.48 ± 2.96, t = - 2.70, p = 0.012) and behavioral frequency (- 1.86 ± 4.58, t = - 2.19, p = 0.037); distress remained significant after adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot RCT, WCA use resulted in a significant decrease in caregiver distress. Future research will identify whether longer use of WCA can impact other caregiver and behavioral outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02420535 (Date of registry: 4/20/2015, prior to the start of the clinical trial).

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者的行为和心理症状是普遍存在的,并与多种负面结果相关。本试点随机对照试验(RCT)评估了使用 WeCareAdvisor 的效果,这是一种创新的基于网络的工具,旨在使家庭护理人员能够评估、管理和跟踪 BPSD。

方法

这项 RCT 招募了来自密歇根州安阿伯和马里兰州巴尔的摩的社区和临床环境中的 57 名痴呆症家庭护理人员。参与者被随机分配到立即使用 WeCareAdvisor 工具(WCA,n=27)或候补名单对照组(n=30),后者在一个月的等待期后使用该工具。在基线(T0)和 WCA(T1)和候补名单对照组(T2)组的一个月随访时,评估了护理人员和他们照顾的人的结果。

结果

护理人员的平均年龄为 65.9±14.0 岁。大约一半(49%)是配偶。除了护理人员信心的平均值外,基线特征在两组之间是可比的,对照组的信心较高(WCA 35.0±10.0 与候补名单对照组 39.7±6.9,p=0.04)。痴呆症患者的特征在 WCA 和对照组之间没有显著差异。在使用工具一个月后(T1),WCA 护理人员的护理人员困扰(-6.08±6.31 分,t=-4.82,p<0.0001)、行为频率(-3.60±5.05,t=-3.56,p=0.002)、严重程度(-3.24±3.87,t=-4.19,p=0.0003)和总行为评分(-6.80±10.73,t=-3.17,p=0.004)均显著改善。在同一时间内,候补名单对照组的护理人员的信心显著下降(-6.40±10.30,t=-3.40,p=0.002)。与候补名单组相比,WCA 组的困扰改善更大(T0-T1;t=-2.49,p=0.02),调整了地点和基线困扰后仍然显著。两组在护理人员信心或其他次要结果方面没有显著差异。在使用工具一个月后(T2),候补名单组的护理人员困扰(-3.72±7.53,t=-2.66,p=0.013)、压力(-0.41±1.02,t=-2.19,p=0.037)、信心(4.38±5.17,t=4.56,p<0.0001)、负担(-2.76±7.26,t=-2.05,p=0.05)、负面沟通(-1.48±2.96,t=-2.70,p=0.012)和行为频率(-1.86±4.58,t=-2.19,p=0.037)也显著改善;调整后困扰仍然显著。

结论

在这项试点 RCT 中,WCA 的使用导致护理人员的困扰显著减少。未来的研究将确定是否更长时间地使用 WCA 可以影响其他护理人员和行为结果。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT02420535(注册日期:2015 年 4 月 20 日,在临床试验开始之前)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c6b/5946471/b0f3f8948d7d/12877_2018_801_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验