Tudosescu Ruxandra, Alexandrescu Cristina Mihaela, Istrate Sânziana Luminiţa, Vrapciu Alexandra Diana, Ciuluvică Radu Constantin, Voinea Liliana
Ophthalmology Department, "Regina Maria" Private Health Care Network, Dorobanţi Hyperclinic, Bucharest, Romania.
Ophthalmology Department, University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Mar;62(1):42-47.
To assess the relationship between the macular pigment optical density and blue-light issued by computers, glare sensibility, with iris color, age, sex, or refractive errors.
83 patients (166 eyes) were enrolled in a prospective observational study. They were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (study group) - computer using patients (time spent in front of the computer for minimum 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, 2 years) - 43 patients and group 2 (control group) - 40 patients. The following investigations were conducted in all the selected cases: visual acuity, refraction, biomicroscopy, measurement of the MPOD, glare sensitivity, assessment of eye color.
51.81% of the patients were included in group 1, while the rest, 48.19%, were in group 2. Thus, the MPOD had a mean value of (+/ -SD) 0.42+/ -0.13 (t = -1.08, p = 0.28) in group 1, and 0.44+/ -0.16 on the LE. The results showed a MPOD mean value of 0.51+/ - 0.16 in group 2 and 0.51+/ -0 .16. (t = 0.49, p = 0 .62) on the LE. 55.77% of the patients with light colored iris and 56.14% of those with dark iris had a low MPOD.
The data from our study failed to illustrate a significant correlation between MPOD and blue-light issued by computers. Furthermore, a statistic significant relationship regarding iris color, refractive errors, glare, and MPOD was not observed.
L = lutein, Z = zeaxanthin, MZ = meso-zeaxanthin, AMD = age related macular degeneration, MPOD = macular pigment optical density, MP = macular pigment, HFP = Heterochromatic Flicker Photometry, RE = right eye, LE = left eye.
评估黄斑色素光密度与电脑发出的蓝光、眩光敏感度、虹膜颜色、年龄、性别或屈光不正之间的关系。
83例患者(166只眼)纳入一项前瞻性观察研究。他们被分为两组:第1组(研究组)——使用电脑的患者(每天在电脑前至少花费8小时,每周5天,共2年)——43例患者;第2组(对照组)——40例患者。对所有入选病例进行了以下检查:视力、验光、生物显微镜检查、黄斑色素光密度测量、眩光敏感度、眼睛颜色评估。
51.81%的患者被纳入第1组,其余48.19%在第2组。因此,第1组黄斑色素光密度的平均值(±标准差)为0.42±0.13(t=-1.08,p=0.28),左眼为0.44±0.16。结果显示,第2组黄斑色素光密度平均值为0.51±0.16,左眼为0.51±0.16(t=0.49,p=0.62)。55.77%虹膜颜色浅的患者和56.14%虹膜颜色深的患者黄斑色素光密度较低。
我们研究的数据未能说明黄斑色素光密度与电脑发出的蓝光之间存在显著相关性。此外,未观察到虹膜颜色、屈光不正、眩光和黄斑色素光密度之间存在统计学显著关系。
L=叶黄素,Z=玉米黄质,MZ=内消旋玉米黄质,AMD=年龄相关性黄斑变性,MPOD=黄斑色素光密度,MP=黄斑色素,HFP=异色闪烁光度法,RE=右眼,LE=左眼。