Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):566-576. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0572.
The physical benefits of resistance exercise training (RET) are well documented, but less is known regarding the association of RET with mental health outcomes. To date, no quantitative synthesis of the antidepressant effects of RET has been conducted.
To estimate the association of efficacy of RET with depressive symptoms and determine the extent to which logical, theoretical, and/or prior empirical variables are associated with depressive symptoms and whether the association of efficacy of RET with depressive symptoms accounts for variability in the overall effect size.
Articles published before August 2017, located using Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science.
Randomized clinical trials included randomization to RET (n = 947) or a nonactive control condition (n = 930).
Hedges d effect sizes were computed and random-effects models were used for all analyses. Meta-regression was conducted to quantify the potential moderating influence of participant and trial characteristics.
Randomized clinical trials used validated measures of depressive symptoms assessed at baseline and midintervention and/or postintervention. Four primary moderators were selected a priori to provide focused research hypotheses about variation in effect size: total volume of prescribed RET, whether participants were healthy or physically or mentally ill, whether or not allocation and/or assessment were blinded, and whether or not the RET intervention resulted in a significant improvement in strength.
Fifty-four effects were derived from 33 randomized clinical trials involving 1877 participants. Resistance exercise training was associated with a significant reduction in depressive symptoms with a moderate-sized mean effect ∆ of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.48-0.83; z = 7.35; P < .001). Significant heterogeneity was indicated (total Q = 216.92, df = 53; P < .001; I2 = 76.0% [95% CI, 72.7%-79.0%]), and sampling error accounted for 32.9% of observed variance. The number needed to treat was 4. Total volume of prescribed RET, participant health status, and strength improvements were not significantly associated with the antidepressant effect of RET. However, smaller reductions in depressive symptoms were derived from randomized clinical trials with blinded allocation and/or assessment.
Resistance exercise training significantly reduced depressive symptoms among adults regardless of health status, total prescribed volume of RET, or significant improvements in strength. Better-quality randomized clinical trials blinding both allocation and assessment and comparing RET with other empirically supported treatments for depressive symptoms are needed.
抗阻运动训练(RET)的身体益处已得到充分证明,但关于RET与心理健康结果的关联知之甚少。迄今为止,尚未对RET的抗抑郁作用进行定量综合。
估计 RET 的疗效与抑郁症状的相关性,并确定逻辑、理论和/或先前的经验变量与抑郁症状的相关性,以及 RET 的疗效与抑郁症状的相关性是否可以解释总体效应大小的变异性。
使用 Google Scholar、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PubMed 和 Web of Science 搜索 2017 年 8 月之前发表的文章。
纳入随机临床试验,随机分配至 RET(n=947)或非活动对照条件(n=930)。
计算了 Hedges d 效应量,并对所有分析均采用随机效应模型。进行了元回归以量化参与者和试验特征的潜在调节影响。
随机临床试验使用了经过验证的抑郁症状评估量表,这些量表在基线、中期干预和/或干预后进行评估。根据先前的研究假设,选择了四个主要的调节变量,以提供对效应大小变化的重点研究假说:规定的 RET 总容量、参与者的健康状况或身体或精神疾病状况、分配和/或评估是否为盲法以及 RET 干预是否导致力量显著改善。
从 33 项随机临床试验中得出了 54 项效应,涉及 1877 名参与者。抗阻运动训练与抑郁症状的显著减轻相关,平均效应量为中等大小的 ∆0.66(95%CI,0.48-0.83;z=7.35;P<.001)。表明存在显著的异质性(总 Q=216.92,df=53;P<.001;I2=76.0%[95%CI,72.7%-79.0%]),抽样误差解释了观察到的方差的 32.9%。需要治疗的人数为 4。规定的 RET 总容量、参与者的健康状况和力量改善与 RET 的抗抑郁作用无关。然而,来自随机临床试验的抑郁症状减轻幅度较小,这些试验采用了盲法分配和/或评估。
抗阻运动训练显著降低了成年人的抑郁症状,无论其健康状况、规定的 RET 总容量或力量的显著改善如何。需要更好质量的随机临床试验,这些试验对分配和评估均采用盲法,并将 RET 与其他经实证支持的抑郁症状治疗方法进行比较。