• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用共同设计为医疗团队开发一项集体领导力干预措施,以改善安全文化。

Using Co-Design to Develop a Collective Leadership Intervention for Healthcare Teams to Improve Safety Culture.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Integrated Care Team Older Persons, Community Healthcare Organisation 6, Clonskeagh, Dublin 6, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 5;15(6):1182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061182.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15061182
PMID:29874883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6025638/
Abstract

While co-design methods are becoming more popular in healthcare; there is a gap within the peer-reviewed literature on to do co-design in practice. This paper addresses this gap by delineating the approach taken in the co-design of a collective leadership intervention to improve healthcare team performance and patient safety culture. Over the course of six workshops healthcare staff, patient representatives and advocates, and health systems researchers collaboratively co-designed the intervention. The inputs to the process, exercises and activities that took place during the workshops and the outputs of the workshops are described. The co-design method, while challenging at times, had many benefits including grounding the intervention in the real-world experiences of healthcare teams. Implications of the method for health systems research are discussed.

摘要

虽然共同设计方法在医疗保健领域越来越受欢迎,但同行评议文献中仍存在实践中如何进行共同设计的空白。本文通过描述共同设计一项集体领导力干预措施以改善医疗团队绩效和患者安全文化的方法来填补这一空白。在六次研讨会中,医疗保健人员、患者代表和倡导者以及卫生系统研究人员共同设计了该干预措施。描述了研讨会期间发生的过程、练习和活动的投入以及研讨会的产出。虽然共同设计方法有时具有挑战性,但它有许多好处,包括使干预措施扎根于医疗团队的实际经验中。还讨论了该方法对卫生系统研究的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6025638/f6be559c4e7a/ijerph-15-01182-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6025638/f6be559c4e7a/ijerph-15-01182-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b8/6025638/f6be559c4e7a/ijerph-15-01182-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Co-Design to Develop a Collective Leadership Intervention for Healthcare Teams to Improve Safety Culture.运用共同设计为医疗团队开发一项集体领导力干预措施,以改善安全文化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 5;15(6):1182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061182.
2
Collective leadership and safety cultures (Co-Lead): protocol for a mixed-methods pilot evaluation of the impact of a co-designed collective leadership intervention on team performance and safety culture in a hospital group in Ireland.集体领导和安全文化(Co-Lead):一项混合方法试点评估的方案,评估在爱尔兰一家医院集团中共同设计的集体领导干预对团队绩效和安全文化的影响。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017569. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017569.
3
The Collective Leadership for Safety Culture (Co-Lead) Team Intervention to Promote Teamwork and Patient Safety.集体领导力促进安全文化(Co-Lead)团队干预以促进团队合作和患者安全。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 22;17(22):8673. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228673.
4
Identifying the context, mechanisms and outcomes underlying collective leadership in teams: building a realist programme theory.识别团队集体领导背后的背景、机制和结果:构建一个现实主义的方案理论。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05129-1.
5
Designing and pilot testing of a leadership intervention to improve quality and safety in nursing homes and home care (the SAFE-LEAD intervention).设计并试点领导力干预措施,以提高养老院和家庭护理的质量和安全性(SAFE-LEAD 干预)。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e027790. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027790.
6
Can shared leadership enhance clinical team management? A systematic review.共享领导力能否提升临床团队管理水平?一项系统综述。
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2019 May 7;32(2):309-335. doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2018-0033. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Strengthening leadership as a catalyst for enhanced patient safety culture: a repeated cross-sectional experimental study.加强领导力以促进患者安全文化的提升:一项重复横断面实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 13;6(5):e010180. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010180.
8
A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co-design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health-care teams.对参与者使用共同设计来开发医疗保健团队集体领导力教育干预措施的体验进行定性评估。
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):358-367. doi: 10.1111/hex.13002. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
A framework for patient safety, part 2: resilience, the next frontier.患者安全框架,第 2 部分:弹性,下一个前沿。
J Nurs Adm. 2011 Nov;41(11):450-2. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182346eae.
10
The cost of harm and savings through safety: using simulated patients for leadership decision support.伤害成本与安全节约:使用模拟患者为领导力决策提供支持。
J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep;8(3):89-96. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e318258cb25.

引用本文的文献

1
A Measurement Science Framework to Optimize CDS for Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in the ED.一个优化急诊科阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的临床决策支持系统的测量科学框架。
Appl Clin Inform. 2025 Aug;16(4):1067-1076. doi: 10.1055/a-2595-0317. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
2
Methods for co-designing health innovations with older adults: A rapid review.与老年人共同设计健康创新的方法:快速综述
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Sep;44(3):e70065. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70065.
3
Co-design of interventions and services with structurally marginalized populations in the context of maternal and early childhood primary care: a rapid scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-creation of a digital tool for the empowerment of parents of children with physical disabilities.共同创建一个增强残疾儿童家长权能的数字工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Dec 11;3:26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0079-6. eCollection 2017.
2
Collective leadership and safety cultures (Co-Lead): protocol for a mixed-methods pilot evaluation of the impact of a co-designed collective leadership intervention on team performance and safety culture in a hospital group in Ireland.集体领导和安全文化(Co-Lead):一项混合方法试点评估的方案,评估在爱尔兰一家医院集团中共同设计的集体领导干预对团队绩效和安全文化的影响。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e017569. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017569.
3
在孕产妇和幼儿初级保健背景下与结构上处于边缘地位的人群共同设计干预措施和服务:一项快速范围审查
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Jun 16;26:e48. doi: 10.1017/S146342362510011X.
4
Developing an integrated depression and tuberculosis care pathway using a co-design approach in a low-resource setting.在资源匮乏的环境中,采用共同设计方法制定综合的抑郁症和结核病护理路径。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2025 May 17;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13033-025-00670-0.
5
Valid consent in the acute hospital setting: perspectives of nursing and medical professionals from a survey-based study.急症医院环境中的有效同意:基于调查研究的护理和医学专业人员观点
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03952-1.
6
Participatory methods in designing digital health interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia. A systematic review.为痴呆症患者的非正式照护者设计数字健康干预措施中的参与式方法。一项系统综述。
Internet Interv. 2024 Dec 28;39:100799. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100799. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Exploring health literacy development through co-design: understanding the expectations for health literacy mediators.通过共同设计探索健康素养发展:理解对健康素养调解人的期望。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf003.
8
Co-designing an intervention for cardiovascular disease risk assessment and management after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in primary care.在初级保健中共同设计一项针对妊娠高血压疾病后心血管疾病风险评估与管理的干预措施。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Feb 20;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01269-6.
9
Co-Design of a Facilitated Self-Management Toolkit for People With Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病患者自助管理工具包的协同设计。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70104. doi: 10.1111/hex.70104.
10
Co-design for technology in paediatric therapy: Developing an augmented reality intervention for children with developmental coordination disorder.儿科治疗技术的协同设计:为发育性协调障碍儿童开发增强现实干预措施。
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2024 Aug 8;11:20556683241266780. doi: 10.1177/20556683241266780. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Using Experience-based Co-design with older patients, their families and staff to improve palliative care experiences in the Emergency Department: A reflective critique on the process and outcomes.
与老年患者、其家属及工作人员采用基于经验的协同设计来改善急诊科的姑息治疗体验:对过程与结果的反思性批判
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Mar;68:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
4
Using a co-production prioritization exercise involving South Asian children, young people and their families to identify health priorities requiring further research and public awareness.采用共同制定优先事项的做法,让南亚儿童、青年及其家人参与,以确定需要进一步研究和提高公众认识的健康优先事项。
Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):852-861. doi: 10.1111/hex.12524. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
5
Implementation, context and complexity.实施、背景与复杂性
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0506-3.
6
A co-design process developing heuristics for practitioners providing end of life care for people with dementia.一个共同设计过程,旨在为为痴呆症患者提供临终关怀的从业者制定启发式方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 2;15:68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0146-z.
7
Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees.共同设计与实施研究:伦理委员会面临的挑战与解决方案
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 16;16:78. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2.
8
Coproduction of healthcare service.医疗服务的共同生产
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):509-17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
9
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness.共享领导与团队效能的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Mar;99(2):181-98. doi: 10.1037/a0034531. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
10
Improving healthcare through the use of co-design.通过共同设计改善医疗保健。
N Z Med J. 2012 Jun 29;125(1357):76-87.