• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在血管周隙、旁血管和旁静脉通道中,整体流动是否合理?

Is bulk flow plausible in perivascular, paravascular and paravenous channels?

机构信息

Biofluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.

出版信息

Fluids Barriers CNS. 2018 Jun 15;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12987-018-0103-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12987-018-0103-8
PMID:29903035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6003203/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transport of solutes has been observed in the spaces surrounding cerebral arteries and veins. Indeed, transport has been found in opposite directions in two different spaces around arteries. These findings have motivated hypotheses of bulk flow within these spaces. The glymphatic circulation hypothesis involves flow of cerebrospinal fluid from the cortical subarachnoid space to the parenchyma along the paraarterial (extramural, Virchow-Robin) space around arteries, and return flow to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space via paravenous channels. The second hypothesis involves flow of interstitial fluid from the parenchyma to lymphatic vessels along basement membranes between arterial smooth muscle cells.

METHODS

This article evaluates the plausibility of steady, pressure-driven flow in these channels with one-dimensional branching models.

RESULTS

According to the models, the hydraulic resistance of arterial basement membranes is too large to accommodate estimated interstitial perfusion of the brain, unless the flow empties to lymphatic ducts after only several generations (still within the parenchyma). The estimated pressure drops required to drive paraarterial and paravenous flows of the same magnitude are not large, but paravenous flow back to the CSF space means that the total pressure difference driving both flows is limited to local pressure differences among the different CSF compartments, which are estimated to be small.

CONCLUSIONS

Periarterial flow and glymphatic circulation driven by steady pressure are both found to be implausible, given current estimates of anatomical and fluid dynamic parameters.

摘要

背景

在脑动脉和静脉周围的空间中已经观察到溶质的转运。事实上,在动脉周围的两个不同空间中已经发现了相反方向的转运。这些发现激发了这些空间内的整体流动假说。神经淋巴假说涉及脑脊髓液从皮质下蛛网膜空间沿着动脉周围的旁血管(外膜,Virchow-Robin)空间向实质流动,以及通过旁静脉通道向脑脊髓液(CSF)空间的回流。第二个假说是指间质液从实质沿着动脉平滑肌细胞之间的基底膜向淋巴管流动。

方法

本文通过一维分支模型评估了这些通道中稳定的压力驱动流动的可能性。

结果

根据模型,动脉基底膜的水力阻力太大,无法容纳大脑估计的间质灌注,除非在仅经过几代(仍在实质内)后,流量排空到淋巴管。驱动同等大小的旁血管和旁静脉流动所需的估计压力降并不大,但旁静脉回流到 CSF 空间意味着驱动这两种流动的总压差仅限于不同 CSF 隔室之间的局部压差,这些压差估计很小。

结论

考虑到当前对解剖学和流体动力学参数的估计,稳态压力驱动的动脉周围流动和神经淋巴循环都被认为是不合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/5a053cac4a85/12987_2018_103_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/5c61a0eedb1d/12987_2018_103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/20e39657220a/12987_2018_103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/32cbee8aaf7b/12987_2018_103_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/e1e3cf690d56/12987_2018_103_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/5a053cac4a85/12987_2018_103_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/5c61a0eedb1d/12987_2018_103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/20e39657220a/12987_2018_103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/32cbee8aaf7b/12987_2018_103_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/e1e3cf690d56/12987_2018_103_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/619d/6003203/5a053cac4a85/12987_2018_103_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is bulk flow plausible in perivascular, paravascular and paravenous channels?在血管周隙、旁血管和旁静脉通道中,整体流动是否合理?
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2018 Jun 15;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12987-018-0103-8.
2
Convective influx/glymphatic system: tracers injected into the CSF enter and leave the brain along separate periarterial basement membrane pathways.对流内渗/神经淋巴系统:注入 CSF 的示踪剂沿着不同的动脉周围基膜途径进入和离开大脑。
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jul;136(1):139-152. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1862-7. Epub 2018 May 12.
3
A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β.脉络膜丛途径促进脑实质中的 CSF 流动和间质溶质(包括淀粉样β)的清除。
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Aug 15;4(147):147ra111. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748.
4
Mechanisms of tracer transport in cerebral perivascular spaces.脑内血管周围间隙示踪剂转运的机制。
J Biomech. 2021 Mar 30;118:110278. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110278. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
The role of brain barriers in fluid movement in the CNS: is there a 'glymphatic' system?脑屏障在中枢神经系统液体运动中的作用:是否存在“类淋巴系统”?
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Mar;135(3):387-407. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1812-4. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
6
Paravascular channels, cisterns, and the subarachnoid space in the rat brain: A single compartment with preferential pathways.大鼠脑中的血管周围通道、脑池和蛛网膜下腔:一个具有优先通路的单一腔室。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Apr;37(4):1374-1385. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16655550. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
7
Vascular basement membranes as pathways for the passage of fluid into and out of the brain.血管基底膜作为液体进出大脑的通道。
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 May;131(5):725-36. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1555-z. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
8
Rapid lymphatic efflux limits cerebrospinal fluid flow to the brain.快速的淋巴液流出限制了脑脊液向大脑的流动。
Acta Neuropathol. 2019 Jan;137(1):151-165. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1916-x. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Arterial pulsations drive oscillatory flow of CSF but not directional pumping.动脉搏动驱动 CSF 的振荡流动,但不驱动定向泵送。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 22;10(1):10102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66887-w.
10
Pulsatile cerebral paraarterial flow by peristalsis, pressure and directional resistance.搏动性脑侧副循环由蠕动、压力和方向阻力产生。
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2023 Jun 8;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12987-023-00445-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The pathogenesis of cerebral small vessel disease and vascular cognitive impairment.脑小血管病与血管性认知障碍的发病机制。
Physiol Rev. 2025 Jul 1;105(3):1075-1171. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2024. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow.脑脊液流动
Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2023;55:237-264. doi: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120720-011638. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
3
Novel insights into non-coding RNAs and their role in hydrocephalus.非编码RNA及其在脑积水发病机制中的作用的新见解。

本文引用的文献

1
Cortical Spreading Depression Closes Paravascular Space and Impairs Glymphatic Flow: Implications for Migraine Headache.皮质扩散性抑制会封闭血管周围间隙并损害类淋巴系统流动:对偏头痛的启示。
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 15;37(11):2904-2915. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3390-16.2017. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
2
Glymphatic solute transport does not require bulk flow.脑淋巴液溶质转运不依赖于体循环。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 8;6:38635. doi: 10.1038/srep38635.
3
Spatial model of convective solute transport in brain extracellular space does not support a "glymphatic" mechanism.
Neural Regen Res. 2026 Feb 1;21(2):636-647. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00963. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
4
Aquaporin-4 activation facilitates glymphatic system function and hematoma clearance post-intracerebral hemorrhage.水通道蛋白4的激活促进脑出血后类淋巴系统功能及血肿清除。
Glia. 2025 Feb;73(2):368-380. doi: 10.1002/glia.24639. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
5
Directional flow in perivascular networks: mixed finite elements for reduced-dimensional models on graphs.血管周围网络中的定向流动:图上降维模型的混合有限元方法。
J Math Biol. 2024 Nov 7;89(6):60. doi: 10.1007/s00285-024-02154-0.
6
A brain-wide solute transport model of the glymphatic system.脑内全域溶质转运模型的糖酵解系统。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Oct;21(219):20240369. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0369. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
7
Modeling CSF circulation and the glymphatic system during infusion using subject specific intracranial pressures and brain geometries.利用个体颅内压和脑几何模型模拟输注过程中的 CSF 循环和脑淋巴系统。
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024 Oct 15;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12987-024-00582-0.
8
Navigating Central Oxytocin Transport: Known Realms and Uncharted Territories.探索中枢催产素转运:已知领域与未知区域
Neuroscientist. 2025 Jun;31(3):234-261. doi: 10.1177/10738584241268754. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
9
Modal Analysis of Cerebrovascular Effects for Digital Health Integration of Neurostimulation Therapies-A Review of Technology Concepts.用于神经刺激疗法数字健康整合的脑血管效应模态分析——技术概念综述
Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):591. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14060591.
10
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: Current techniques and future advancements.磁共振扩散成像在脑脊液动力学中的应用:当前技术和未来进展。
NMR Biomed. 2024 Sep;37(9):e5162. doi: 10.1002/nbm.5162. Epub 2024 May 7.
脑细胞外空间对流溶质转运的空间模型不支持“类淋巴”机制。
J Gen Physiol. 2016 Dec;148(6):489-501. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201611684. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
4
Paravascular channels, cisterns, and the subarachnoid space in the rat brain: A single compartment with preferential pathways.大鼠脑中的血管周围通道、脑池和蛛网膜下腔:一个具有优先通路的单一腔室。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Apr;37(4):1374-1385. doi: 10.1177/0271678X16655550. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
5
Pulsations with reflected boundary waves: a hydrodynamic reverse transport mechanism for perivascular drainage in the brain.伴有反射边界波的脉动:一种用于脑周血管引流的流体动力学逆向传输机制
J Math Biol. 2016 Aug;73(2):469-90. doi: 10.1007/s00285-015-0960-6. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Cardiac Output and Cerebral Blood Flow: The Integrated Regulation of Brain Perfusion in Adult Humans.心输出量与脑血流量:成年人类脑灌注的综合调节
Anesthesiology. 2015 Nov;123(5):1198-208. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000872.
7
Peristalsis with Oscillating Flow Resistance: A Mechanism for Periarterial Clearance of Amyloid Beta from the Brain.具有振荡流阻的蠕动:一种从大脑中清除动脉周围β淀粉样蛋白的机制。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 May;44(5):1553-65. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1457-6. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
The Glymphatic System: A Beginner's Guide.淋巴系统入门指南。
Neurochem Res. 2015 Dec;40(12):2583-99. doi: 10.1007/s11064-015-1581-6. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Mechanisms of fluid movement into, through and out of the brain: evaluation of the evidence.脑内液流的动力学机制:证据评估。
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2014 Dec 2;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/2045-8118-11-26. eCollection 2014.
10
Failure of perivascular drainage of β-amyloid in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.脑淀粉样血管病中β-淀粉样蛋白血管周围引流失败。
Brain Pathol. 2014 Jul;24(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12159.