Division of Nephrology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e021418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021418.
Hospitalisation with acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with short-term and long-term adverse events, but patient and caregiver experiences with AKI are not well described. We sought to better understand patient and caregiver perspectives after a hospitalisation with AKI to inform discharge strategies that may improve outcomes for this high-risk population.
Qualitative study with semistructured interviews.
Tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adult patients (n=15) who survived a hospitalisation with Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stage 2 or 3 AKI from May to December 2016. We also interviewed five patient caregivers. We required patients to have no previous evidence of severe chronic kidney disease (ie, prior receipt of dialysis, previous kidney transplantation or pre-existing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) under 30 mL/min/1.73 m).
We identified three over-arching themes: (1) prioritisation of conditions other than AKI, reflected by the importance placed on other comorbidities and the omission of AKI as part of the ongoing medical history; (2) variability in comprehension of the significance of AKI, represented by minimal knowledge of the causes and symptoms associated with AKI, along with misinformation on the kidneys' ability to self-repair; and (3) anxiety from discharge planning and competing health demands, illustrated by complicated discharge plans involving multiple specialist appointments.
Patients and caregivers view AKI as a short-term and reversible condition, giving it little thought during the postdischarge period. As a result, reliance on patients and caregivers to report an episode of AKI to their outpatient physicians is unlikely to be successful. Patient-centred tools and decision aids are needed to bridge the gap between a hospitalisation with AKI and the safe transition to the outpatient setting.
急性肾损伤(AKI)住院与短期和长期不良事件相关,但患者和照护者的 AKI 体验并未得到很好的描述。我们旨在更好地了解 AKI 住院后患者和照护者的观点,以便为这一高风险人群提供可能改善结局的出院策略。
定性研究,采用半结构式访谈。
加拿大安大略省多伦多市的一家三级保健医院。
2016 年 5 月至 12 月期间存活的 AKI 符合肾脏病改善全球结局(KDIGO)分期 2 或 3 期的成年患者(n=15)。我们还采访了 5 名患者照护者。要求患者之前无严重慢性肾脏病的证据(即,之前接受过透析、之前接受过肾移植或预先存在的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<30mL/min/1.73m)。
我们确定了三个总体主题:(1)对 AKI 以外疾病的重视,这反映在对其他合并症的重视以及将 AKI 排除在正在进行的病史之外;(2)对 AKI 重要性的理解存在差异,表现为对 AKI 相关原因和症状的了解有限,以及对肾脏自我修复能力的错误信息;(3)出院计划和竞争健康需求带来的焦虑,表现为涉及多个专科预约的复杂出院计划。
患者和照护者将 AKI 视为一种短期和可逆的疾病,在出院后期间很少考虑。因此,依赖患者和照护者向其门诊医生报告 AKI 发作不太可能成功。需要以患者为中心的工具和决策辅助工具来弥合 AKI 住院和安全过渡到门诊环境之间的差距。