Kammoun Rim, Ghannouchi Ines, Rouatbi Sonia, Ben Saad Helmi
a Department of Physiology and Functional Explorations , Farhat HACHED Hospital , Sousse , Tunisia.
b Laboratory of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse , University of Sousse , Sousse , Tunisia.
Libyan J Med. 2018 Dec;13(1):1487751. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751.
An obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD) is defined by a low forced expiratory volume/'forced/slow' vital capacity (FEV/FVC) (e.g. <lower limit of normal (LLN)). However, the LLN can be estimated either by the 90% confidence interval (or the 90th percentile) (American Thoracic and the European Respiratory Societies (ATS/ERS) method) or by the Z-score (global lung initiative (GLI) method). In 2014, a new alternative classification (GLI classification) for grading the OVD severity was proposed to replace the 2005-ATS/ERS one. The aims of the present study were to determine, according to the two methods (GLI vs. ATS/ERS), the frequency of participants having an OVD; and to compare the two classifications (GLI vs. ATS/ERS) of OVD severity. This was a prospective study including 1000 participants (mean age = 41 ± 10 years). The OVD was defined according to the ATS/ERS [FEV/FVC < LLN (=local norms value - 1.64 × residual standard deviation)] and GLI (FEV/FVC Z-score < -1.64) criteria. The following OVD classifications severity were applied: ATS/ERS (FEV%pred): mild (>70%), moderate (60-69%), moderately severe (50-59%), severe (35-49%), and very severe (<35%) and GLI (FEV Z-score): mild (≥ -2.0), moderate (-2.0 to -2.5), moderately severe (-2.5 to -3.0), severe (-3.0 to -4.0), and very severe (<-4.0). The frequencies of OVD were 14.4% (ATS/ERS method) and 10.5% (GLI method) (p < 0.05). Among the 103 participants having an OVD according to the two methods, the severity classification was mild (34.95% vs. 37.86%, p < 0.05), moderate (25.24% vs. 18.45%, p < 0.05), moderately severe (23.30% vs. 15.53%, p = 0.144), severe (9.71% vs. 20.39%, p < 0.05), and very severe (6.80% vs. 7.77%, p = 0.785), respectively for the ATS/ERS and GLI classifications. The two OVD definitions were not exchangeable. Moreover, the two grading severity systems misclassified the OVD grades.
阻塞性通气功能障碍(OVD)定义为用力呼气量/用力/缓慢肺活量(FEV/FVC)降低(例如,低于正常下限(LLN))。然而,LLN可以通过90%置信区间(或第90百分位数)(美国胸科学会和欧洲呼吸学会(ATS/ERS)方法)或Z评分(全球肺倡议(GLI)方法)来估计。2014年,有人提出了一种新的用于对OVD严重程度进行分级的替代分类方法(GLI分类),以取代2005年的ATS/ERS分类方法。本研究的目的是根据两种方法(GLI与ATS/ERS)确定患有OVD的参与者的频率;并比较OVD严重程度的两种分类(GLI与ATS/ERS)。这是一项前瞻性研究,包括1000名参与者(平均年龄=41±10岁)。OVD根据ATS/ERS[FEV/FVC<LLN(=当地规范值-1.64×残余标准差)]和GLI(FEV/FVC Z评分<-1.64)标准进行定义。应用了以下OVD分类严重程度:ATS/ERS(FEV%预计值):轻度(>70%)、中度(60-69%)、中重度(50-59%)、重度(35-49%)和极重度(<35%),以及GLI(FEV Z评分):轻度(≥-2.0)、中度(-2.0至-2.5)、中重度(-2.5至-3.0)、重度(-3.0至-4.0)和极重度(<-4.0)。OVD的频率分别为14.4%(ATS/ERS方法)和10.5%(GLI方法)(p<0.05)。在根据两种方法患有OVD的103名参与者中,严重程度分类为轻度(34.95%对37.86%,p<0.05)、中度(25.24%对18.45%,p<0.05)、中重度(23.30%对15.53%,p=0.144)、重度(9.71%对20.39%,p<0.05)和极重度(6.80%对7.77%,p=0.785),分别对应ATS/ERS和GLI分类。两种OVD定义不可互换。此外,两种分级严重程度系统对OVD等级的分类有误。