• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国能源系统及其在不同社会和技术发展范式下相关排放的演变:稳健决策中使用的合理情景。

Evolution of the United States Energy System and Related Emissions under Varying Social and Technological Development Paradigms: Plausible Scenarios for Use in Robust Decision Making.

机构信息

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development , 109 TW Alexander Drive , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina 27711 , United States.

Eastern Research Group, Inc. , 110 Hartwell Avenue , Lexington , Massachusetts 02421 , United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 17;52(14):8027-8038. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00575. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.8b00575
PMID:29928794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7297051/
Abstract

The energy system is the primary source of air pollution. Thus, evolution of the energy system into the future will affect society's ability to maintain air quality. Anticipating this evolution is difficult because of inherent uncertainty in predicting future energy demand, fuel use, and technology adoption. We apply scenario planning to address this uncertainty, developing four very different visions of the future. Stakeholder engagement suggested that technological progress and social attitudes toward the environment are critical and uncertain factors for determining future emissions. Combining transformative and static assumptions about these factors yields a matrix of four scenarios that encompass a wide range of outcomes. We implement these scenarios in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) model. Results suggest that both shifting attitudes and technology transformation may lead to emission reductions relative to the present, even without additional policies. Emission caps, such as the Cross-State Air-Pollution Rule, are most effective at protecting against future emission increases. An important outcome of this work is the scenario-implementation approach, which uses technology-specific discount rates to encourage scenario-specific technology and fuel choices. End-use energy demands are modified to approximate societal changes. This implementation allows the model to respond to perturbations in manners consistent with each scenario.

摘要

能源系统是空气污染的主要来源。因此,未来能源系统的发展将影响社会维持空气质量的能力。由于未来能源需求、燃料使用和技术采用的预测存在固有不确定性,因此很难预测这种演变。我们应用情景规划来解决这一不确定性,提出了未来的四个截然不同的愿景。利益相关者的参与表明,技术进步和社会对环境的态度是决定未来排放的关键和不确定因素。结合对这些因素的变革性和静态假设,产生了一个包含广泛结果的四个情景矩阵。我们将这些情景应用于美国环境保护署的 MARKet ALlocation(MARKAL)模型中。结果表明,即使没有额外的政策,态度和技术的转变都可能导致排放量相对于现在减少。排放上限,如跨州空气污染规则,在防止未来排放增加方面最为有效。这项工作的一个重要成果是情景实施方法,该方法使用特定于技术的折扣率来鼓励特定于情景的技术和燃料选择。最终用途能源需求进行了修改,以近似社会变化。这种实施方式使模型能够以符合每个情景的方式对干扰做出响应。

相似文献

1
Evolution of the United States Energy System and Related Emissions under Varying Social and Technological Development Paradigms: Plausible Scenarios for Use in Robust Decision Making.美国能源系统及其在不同社会和技术发展范式下相关排放的演变:稳健决策中使用的合理情景。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 17;52(14):8027-8038. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00575. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
Role of future scenarios in understanding deep uncertainty in long-term air quality management.未来情景在理解长期空气质量管理中的深度不确定性方面的作用。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Nov;65(11):1327-40. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1084783.
3
Emission projections for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 812 second prospective Clean Air Act cost/benefit analysis.美国环境保护局第812节第二次前瞻性《清洁空气法》成本效益分析的排放预测。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008 May;58(5):657-72. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.5.657.
4
Impacts of Regulations on Air Quality and Emergency Department Visits in the Atlanta Metropolitan Area, 1999-2013.1999 - 2013年法规对亚特兰大大都市区空气质量及急诊就诊情况的影响
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2018 Apr;2018(195):1-93.
5
Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.第1部分. 多种空气污染成分影响的统计学习方法
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun(183 Pt 1-2):5-50.
6
Energy and emissions implications of automated vehicles in the U.S. energy system.美国能源系统中自动驾驶汽车的能源与排放影响。
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2019;77:132-147. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.003.
7
Accountability analysis of title IV phase 2 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.1990年《清洁空气法修正案》第四章第二阶段的问责分析
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Nov(168):5-35.
8
MOVES-Matrix for high-performance on-road energy and running emission rate modeling applications.MOVES 模型——用于高性能道路能源和行驶排放率建模应用的矩阵。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 Dec;69(12):1415-1428. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1640806. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Trends in onroad transportation energy and emissions.道路运输能源与排放趋势。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2018 Jun;68(6):514-563. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1454357.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging Existing Energy and Chemical Transport Models to Enhance Air Quality Policy Assessment.衔接现有能源与化学物质传输模型以加强空气质量政策评估。
Environ Model Softw. 2025 Jan;183. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106218.
2
Economy-wide evaluation of CO and air quality impacts of electrification in the United States.美国电气化对 CO 和空气质量影响的全经济范围评估。
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 5;13(1):6693. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33902-9.
3
Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates.纽约市在不同电力碳强度和电动汽车采用率下的交通排放情景。
Nat Energy. 2021 Jan 4;6:92-104. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00740-2.
4
Evaluating long-term emission impacts of large-scale electric vehicle deployment in the US using a human-Earth systems model.使用人类-地球系统模型评估美国大规模电动汽车部署的长期排放影响。
Appl Energy. 2021 Oct 15;300:1-117364. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117364.
5
What is the role of distributed energy resources under scenarios of greenhouse gas reductions? A specific focus on combined heat and power systems in the industrial and commercial sectors.在温室气体减排情景下,分布式能源资源的作用是什么?特别关注工商业领域的热电联产系统。
Appl Energy. 2019 Feb 1;235:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.125.
6
State-level drivers of future fine particulate matter mortality in the United States.美国未来细颗粒物致死率的国家级驱动因素。
Environ Res Lett. 2019 Dec 18;14(12):124071. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab59cb.
7
Energy and emissions implications of automated vehicles in the U.S. energy system.美国能源系统中自动驾驶汽车的能源与排放影响。
Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2019;77:132-147. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.天然气在实现电力部门减排战略中的作用及其对温室气体排放的影响。
Energy Econ. 2016;60:460-468. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.009.
2
Exploring the role of natural gas power plants with carbon capture and storage as a bridge to a low-carbon future.探索具备碳捕获与封存技术的天然气发电厂作为通向低碳未来桥梁的作用。
Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2017 Dec 22;20(2):379-391. doi: 10.1007/s10098-017-1479-x.
3
Projecting state-level air pollutant emissions using an integrated assessment model: GCAM-USA.使用综合评估模型预测州级空气污染物排放:美国全球变化评估模型(GCAM-USA)
Appl Energy. 2017 Dec 15;208:511-521. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.122.
4
Estimating environmental co-benefits of U.S. low-carbon pathways using an integrated assessment model with state-level resolution.使用具有州级分辨率的综合评估模型估算美国低碳路径的环境协同效益。
Appl Energy. 2018 Apr 15;216:482-493. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.122.
5
Effects of recent energy system changes on CO projections for the United States.近期能源系统变化对美国二氧化碳排放预测的影响。
Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2017 Sep 21;19(9):2277-2290. doi: 10.1007/s10098-017-1417-y.
6
Role of future scenarios in understanding deep uncertainty in long-term air quality management.未来情景在理解长期空气质量管理中的深度不确定性方面的作用。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Nov;65(11):1327-40. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1084783.
7
Analysis of alternative pathways for reducing nitrogen oxide emissions.减少氮氧化物排放的替代途径分析。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 Sep;65(9):1083-93. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1062440.
8
Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.气候变化的区域空气质量管理方面:气候缓解措施对区域空气排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 21;49(8):5170-7. doi: 10.1021/es505159z. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
9
Emissions implications of future natural gas production and use in the U.S. and in the Rocky Mountain region.未来美国和落基山地区天然气生产和使用的排放影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Nov 18;48(22):13036-44. doi: 10.1021/es5029537. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
10
How much do electric drive vehicles matter to future U.S. emissions?电动交通工具对美国未来的排放量有多大影响?
Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(3):1382-90. doi: 10.1021/es4045677. Epub 2014 Jan 14.