• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人类-地球系统模型评估美国大规模电动汽车部署的长期排放影响。

Evaluating long-term emission impacts of large-scale electric vehicle deployment in the US using a human-Earth systems model.

作者信息

Ou Yang, Kittner Noah, Babaee Samaneh, Smith Steven J, Nolte Christopher G, Loughlin Daniel H

机构信息

Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park, MD, USA.

Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Appl Energy. 2021 Oct 15;300:1-117364. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117364.

DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117364
PMID:34764534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8576614/
Abstract

While large-scale adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) globally would reduce carbon dioxide (CO) and traditional air pollutant emissions from the transportation sector, emissions from the electric sector, refineries, and potentially other sources would change in response. Here, a multi-sector human-Earth systems model is used to evaluate the net long-term emission implications of large-scale EV adoption in the US over widely differing pathways of the evolution of the electric sector. Our results indicate that high EV adoption would decrease net CO emissions through 2050, even for a scenario where all electric sector capacity additions through 2050 are fossil fuel technologies. Greater net CO reductions would be realized for scenarios that emphasize renewables or decarbonization of electricity production. Net air pollutant emission changes in 2050 are relatively small compared to expected overall decreases from recent levels to 2050. States participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative experience greater CO and air pollutant reductions on a percentage basis. These results suggest that coordinated, multi-sector planning can greatly enhance the climate and environmental benefits of EVs. Additional factors are identified that influence the net emission impacts of EVs, including the retirement of coal capacity, refinery operations under reduced gasoline demands, and price-induced fuel switching in residential heating and in the industrial sector.

摘要

虽然全球大规模采用电动汽车(EV)将减少交通运输部门的二氧化碳(CO)和传统空气污染物排放,但电力部门、炼油厂以及其他潜在来源的排放也会相应改变。在此,我们使用一个多部门人类 - 地球系统模型,来评估在美国电力部门发展路径差异很大的情况下,大规模采用电动汽车的长期净排放影响。我们的结果表明,即使在到2050年所有新增电力部门容量均为化石燃料技术的情景下,高电动汽车采用率也会在2050年前减少净CO排放。对于强调可再生能源或电力生产脱碳的情景,将实现更大幅度的净CO减排。与预计从近期水平到2050年整体下降相比,2050年净空气污染物排放变化相对较小。参与区域温室气体倡议的州,在CO和空气污染物减排百分比方面降幅更大。这些结果表明,协调一致的多部门规划能够极大地增强电动汽车的气候和环境效益。还确定了其他影响电动汽车净排放影响的因素,包括煤炭产能的退役、汽油需求减少情况下的炼油厂运营,以及住宅供暖和工业部门中价格引发的燃料转换。

相似文献

1
Evaluating long-term emission impacts of large-scale electric vehicle deployment in the US using a human-Earth systems model.使用人类-地球系统模型评估美国大规模电动汽车部署的长期排放影响。
Appl Energy. 2021 Oct 15;300:1-117364. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117364.
2
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Transport oil product consumption and GHG emission reduction potential in China: An electric vehicle-based scenario analysis.中国油品运输领域产品能耗及温室气体减排潜力:基于电动汽车的情景分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0222448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222448. eCollection 2019.
5
Real-World Vehicle Emissions Characterization for the Shing Mun Tunnel in Hong Kong and Fort McHenry Tunnel in the United States.香港城门隧道和美国麦克亨利堡隧道的实际车辆排放特征
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2019 Mar;2019(199):5-52.
6
Coordinated EV adoption: double-digit reductions in emissions and fuel use for $40/vehicle-year.协调电动汽车的推广应用:排放量和燃料使用量减少两位数,每辆车每年节省 40 美元。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 17;47(18):10703-7. doi: 10.1021/es4016926. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
7
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
8
Trends in onroad transportation energy and emissions.道路运输能源与排放趋势。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2018 Jun;68(6):514-563. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2018.1454357.
9
[Forecasting of Emission Co-reduction of Greenhouse Gases and Pollutants for the Road Transport Sector in Lanzhou Based on the LEAP Model].基于LEAP模型的兰州市道路运输部门温室气体与污染物协同减排预测
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2022 Jul 8;43(7):3386-3395. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202109119.
10
Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates.纽约市在不同电力碳强度和电动汽车采用率下的交通排放情景。
Nat Energy. 2021 Jan 4;6:92-104. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00740-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of energy, carbon dioxide, and air emission implications of medium- and heavy-duty truck electrification in the United States using EPA's regional TIMES energy systems model.使用美国环境保护局(EPA)的区域TIMES能源系统模型评估美国中型和重型卡车电气化对能源、二氧化碳及空气排放的影响。
Environ Res Energy. 2024;1(4):045018-45018. doi: 10.1088/2753-3751/ad958b. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
Exploring decarbonization pathways for USA passenger and freight mobility.探索美国客运和货运交通的脱碳途径。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 30;14(1):6913. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42483-0.
3
How does adoption of electric vehicles reduce carbon emissions? Evidence from China.

本文引用的文献

1
Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates.纽约市在不同电力碳强度和电动汽车采用率下的交通排放情景。
Nat Energy. 2021 Jan 4;6:92-104. doi: 10.1038/s41560-020-00740-2.
2
Potential for Electric Vehicle Adoption to Mitigate Extreme Air Quality Events in China.中国电动汽车普及对缓解极端空气质量事件的潜力。
Earths Future. 2021 Feb 12;9(2). doi: 10.1029/2020ef001788.
3
Fusing subnational with national climate action is central to decarbonization: the case of the United States.
电动汽车的普及如何减少碳排放?来自中国的证据。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 19;9(9):e20296. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20296. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Regionally differentiated promotion of electric vehicles in China considering environmental and human health impacts.考虑环境和人类健康影响的中国电动汽车区域差异化推广
Environ Res Lett. 2023 Jul 1;18(7):074022. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/acdbde. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
将国家以下层面的气候行动与国家气候行动相结合对于脱碳至关重要:以美国为例。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 16;11(1):5255. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18903-w.
4
Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time.随着时间推移,59个世界地区电动汽车和热泵的净减排量。
Nat Sustain. 2020 Jun;3(6):437-447. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
Open Source Energy System Modeling Using Break-Even Costs to Inform State-Level Policy: A North Carolina Case Study.利用盈亏平衡成本进行开源能源系统建模以提供州级政策信息:北卡罗来纳州案例研究。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jan 21;54(2):665-676. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04184. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
6
Regional Heterogeneity in the Emissions Benefits of Electrified and Lightweighted Light-Duty Vehicles.区域异质性对电动化和轻量化轻型车排放效益的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Sep 17;53(18):10560-10570. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b00648. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
7
China Electricity Generation Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity in 2030: Implications for Electric Vehicles.中国 2030 年电力行业温室气体排放强度:对电动汽车的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 21;53(10):6063-6072. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05264. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Projecting state-level air pollutant emissions using an integrated assessment model: GCAM-USA.使用综合评估模型预测州级空气污染物排放:美国全球变化评估模型(GCAM-USA)
Appl Energy. 2017 Dec 15;208:511-521. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.122.
9
Evolution of the United States Energy System and Related Emissions under Varying Social and Technological Development Paradigms: Plausible Scenarios for Use in Robust Decision Making.美国能源系统及其在不同社会和技术发展范式下相关排放的演变:稳健决策中使用的合理情景。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jul 17;52(14):8027-8038. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00575. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
10
Estimating environmental co-benefits of U.S. low-carbon pathways using an integrated assessment model with state-level resolution.使用具有州级分辨率的综合评估模型估算美国低碳路径的环境协同效益。
Appl Energy. 2018 Apr 15;216:482-493. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.122.