Jeong Yoo-Geum, Lee Wan-Sun, Lee Kyu-Bok
Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;10(3):245-251. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.245. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
To evaluate the accuracy of a model made using the computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) milling method and 3D printing method and to confirm its applicability as a work model for dental prosthesis production.
First, a natural tooth model (ANA-4, Frasaco, Germany) was scanned using an oral scanner. The obtained scan data were then used as a CAD reference model (CRM), to produce a total of 10 models each, either using the milling method or the 3D printing method. The 20 models were then scanned using a desktop scanner and the CAD test model was formed. The accuracy of the two groups was compared using dedicated software to calculate the root mean square (RMS) value after superimposing CRM and CAD test model (CTM).
The RMS value (152±52 µm) of the model manufactured by the milling method was significantly higher than the RMS value (52±9 µm) of the model produced by the 3D printing method.
The accuracy of the 3D printing method is superior to that of the milling method, but at present, both methods are limited in their application as a work model for prosthesis manufacture.
评估使用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)铣削方法和3D打印方法制作的模型的准确性,并确认其作为假牙制作工作模型的适用性。
首先,使用口腔扫描仪扫描天然牙模型(ANA-4,德国弗拉萨科公司)。然后将获得的扫描数据用作CAD参考模型(CRM),分别使用铣削方法和3D打印方法制作总共10个模型。接着使用桌面扫描仪对这20个模型进行扫描并形成CAD测试模型。使用专用软件在叠加CRM和CAD测试模型(CTM)后计算均方根(RMS)值,比较两组模型的准确性。
铣削方法制作的模型的RMS值(152±52 µm)显著高于3D打印方法制作的模型的RMS值(52±9 µm)。
3D打印方法的准确性优于铣削方法,但目前两种方法作为假牙制造工作模型的应用都有限。