Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, SA 5001, Australia.
Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, SA 5001, Australia; Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Jul;68:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
To review the evidence for a systematic relationship between cancer patients' pre-treatment expectations (anticipated side effects) and subsequent experience of treatment-related side effects, and to compare this relationship in patients with no prior treatment experience (cognitive expectations) and with some prior treatment experience (conditioned response).
A total of 12,952 citations were identified through a comprehensive search of the literature published on or before November 2016 and screened against inclusion criteria. Studies were eligible if they included participants undergoing curative treatment for cancer, measured a treatment side effect, examined the relationship between anticipation and experience of side effects, and reported quantitative data.
Thirty-one studies were included in the review and meta-analysis (total N = 5069). The side effects examined were nausea (anticipatory and post-treatment), vomiting, fatigue, pain, problems with concentration, and skin reactions. Meta-analyses indicated positive associations between anticipation and subsequent experience for all included side effects in patients with no prior treatment exposure (r = 0.153-0.431). Stronger associations were found for all included side effects in patients with previous treatment experience (r = 0.211-0.476), except for fatigue (r = 0.266) and pain (r = 0.235). No significant differences were found when overall effect sizes for patients with and without prior treatment exposure were compared for each side effect, except for anticipatory nausea (p = 0.012).
These results may have implications for future interventions that target patients' expectations of cancer treatment-related side effects. Future research could explore patient reports of messages received about likely treatment effects both before and during treatment.
综述癌症患者治疗前预期(预期副作用)与随后经历的治疗相关副作用之间存在系统性关系的证据,并比较无既往治疗经验(认知预期)和有既往治疗经验(条件反射)患者的这种关系。
通过全面检索截至 2016 年 11 月前发表的文献,共识别出 12952 条参考文献,并根据纳入标准进行筛选。如果研究纳入接受根治性癌症治疗的参与者、测量治疗副作用、考察预期与副作用经历之间的关系,以及报告定量数据,则研究符合纳入标准。
共纳入 31 项研究进行综述和荟萃分析(总 N=5069)。所考察的副作用包括恶心(预期和治疗后)、呕吐、疲劳、疼痛、注意力问题和皮肤反应。荟萃分析表明,在无既往治疗暴露的患者中,所有纳入的副作用与预期之间均存在正相关(r=0.153-0.431)。在有既往治疗经验的患者中,所有纳入的副作用均存在更强的相关性(r=0.211-0.476),但疲劳(r=0.266)和疼痛(r=0.235)除外。除了预期性恶心(p=0.012),无既往治疗暴露患者和有既往治疗暴露患者的每种副作用的总体效应大小之间无显著差异。
这些结果可能对未来以癌症治疗相关副作用的患者预期为目标的干预措施产生影响。未来的研究可以探索患者在治疗前后对可能的治疗效果的报告。