Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 4;15(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0697-x.
Aging-related cognitive decline and cognitive impairment greatly impacts older adults' daily life. The worldwide ageing of the population and associated wave of dementia urgently calls for prevention strategies to reduce the risk of cognitive decline. Physical activity (PA) is known to improve cognitive function at older age through processes of neuroplasticity. Yet, emerging studies suggest that larger cognitive gains may be induced when PA interventions are combined with cognitive activity (CA). This meta-analysis evaluates these potential synergistic effects by comparing cognitive effects following combined PA + CA interventions to PA interventions (PA only), CA interventions (CA only) and control groups.
Pubmed, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL and Sportdiscus were searched for English peer-reviewed papers until April 2018. Data were extracted on cognition and factors potentially influencing the cognitive effects: mode of PA + CA combination (sequential or simultaneous), session frequency and duration, intervention length and study quality. Differences between older adults with and without mild cognitive impairments were also explored.
Forty-one studies were included. Relative to the control group, combined PA + CA intervention showed significantly larger gains in cognition (g = 0.316; 95% CI 0.188-0.443; p < .001). Studies that compared combined PA + CA with PA only, showed small but significantly greater cognitive improvement in favor of combined interventions (g = 0.160; 95% CI 0.041-0.279; p = .008). No significant difference was found between combined PA + CA and CA only interventions. Furthermore, cognitive effects tended to be more pronounced for studies using simultaneous designs (g = 0.385; 95%CI 0.214-0.555; p < .001) versus sequential designs (g = 0.114; 95%CI -0.102- 0.331, p = .301). Effects were not moderated by session frequency, session duration, intervention length or study quality. Also, no differences in effects were found between older adults with and without mild cognitive impairments.
Findings of the current meta-analysis suggest that PA programs for older adults could integrate challenging cognitive exercises to improve cognitive health. Combined PA + CA programs should be promoted as a modality for preventing as well as treating cognitive decline in older adults. Sufficient cognitive challenge seems more important to obtain cognitive effects than high doses of intervention sessions.
与衰老相关的认知能力下降和认知障碍极大地影响了老年人的日常生活。人口老龄化的全球趋势以及由此引发的痴呆浪潮迫切需要采取预防策略来降低认知能力下降的风险。运动已被证明可以通过神经可塑性来改善老年人的认知功能。然而,新出现的研究表明,当将身体活动(PA)干预与认知活动(CA)相结合时,可能会引起更大的认知增益。本荟萃分析通过比较联合 PA+CA 干预与 PA 干预(仅 PA)、CA 干预(仅 CA)和对照组的认知效果,来评估这些潜在的协同作用。
在 2018 年 4 月之前,在 Pubmed、Embase、PsycInfo、CINAHL 和 Sportdiscus 上搜索了英语同行评议文献。提取了认知方面的信息,以及可能影响认知效果的因素:PA+CA 组合的模式(顺序或同时)、会议频率和持续时间、干预时间长度和研究质量。还探讨了有和没有轻度认知障碍的老年人之间的差异。
纳入了 41 项研究。与对照组相比,联合 PA+CA 干预对认知的增益明显更大(g=0.316;95%CI 0.188-0.443;p<0.001)。比较联合 PA+CA 与仅 PA 的研究显示,联合干预更有利于较小但具有显著更大的认知改善(g=0.160;95%CI 0.041-0.279;p=0.008)。联合 PA+CA 与 CA 干预之间没有发现显著差异。此外,使用同时设计(g=0.385;95%CI 0.214-0.555;p<0.001)的研究与使用顺序设计(g=0.114;95%CI-0.102-0.331,p=0.301)相比,认知效果往往更为明显。会议频率、会议持续时间、干预时间长度或研究质量并没有调节作用。此外,在有和没有轻度认知障碍的老年人中,效果没有差异。
当前荟萃分析的结果表明,老年人的 PA 计划可以整合具有挑战性的认知练习,以改善认知健康。应推广联合 PA+CA 方案,作为预防和治疗老年人认知能力下降的一种方式。获得认知效果似乎比高剂量的干预更重要的是,要有足够的认知挑战。