Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 100730, Beijing, China.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 10;8(1):10383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28193-4.
The 8 edition of TNM staging system has been released and it incorporates many changes to the T and N classifications for pancreatic cancer. Comparative study between the 7 and 8 edition of TNM staging system from Asian population has not been reported yet. This study aimed to compare the 7 and 8 edition of staging system for pancreatic cancer by using a cohort of pancreatic cancer patients from China after R0 pancreaticoduodenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. The results showed according to the pT classification of 7 edition, pT3 was predominant (87.25%), however, the new edition led to a more equal distribution of pT classification. pT1, pT2 and pT3 was 27.45%, 56.86% and 15.69%, respectively. According to the new pN classification, 18.63% of the patients were pN2. The pT classification in the 8 edition was significantly superior to that in the 7 edition at stratifying patients by overall survival. The pN classification in the 8 edition failed to show an advantage over the 7 edition in stratifying patients by overall survival. Therefore, the new pT classification, but not the new pN classification, showed a significant advantage over the previous edition at predicting the overall survival of pancreatic cancer patients.
第 8 版 TNM 分期系统已经发布,其中包含了对胰腺癌 T 和 N 分类的许多更改。目前尚未报道来自亚洲人群的第 7 版和第 8 版 TNM 分期系统的比较研究。本研究旨在通过使用来自中国接受 R0 胰十二指肠切除术和辅助化疗的胰腺癌患者队列,比较胰腺癌的第 7 版和第 8 版分期系统。结果表明,根据第 7 版的 pT 分类,pT3 占主导地位(87.25%),然而,新版本导致 pT 分类的分布更加均衡。pT1、pT2 和 pT3 分别为 27.45%、56.86%和 15.69%。根据新的 pN 分类,18.63%的患者为 pN2。第 8 版的 pT 分类在分层总体生存方面明显优于第 7 版。第 8 版的 pN 分类在分层总体生存方面未能显示优于第 7 版的优势。因此,新的 pT 分类,而不是新的 pN 分类,在预测胰腺癌患者的总体生存率方面明显优于前一版本。