Laboratory of Functional and Structural Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém-Pará, Brazil.
School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 13;13(7):e0200467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200467. eCollection 2018.
This systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) aimed to verify the capacity of different storage media to preserve viability of periodontal ligament cells in comparison to Hank's Balanced Salt Solution. The searches, selection process, data extraction and Risk of Bias control were conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Five MA were conducted to compare the cell viability between milk versus Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) in a dichotomous (1) or continuous (2) data model; tap water versus HBSS (3); medicinal herbals versus HBSS (4); and saline solution versus HBSS (5). 693 potentially studies were identified, with 18 studies included in the qualitative and 8 studies included in the quantitative analysis. Most of the articles presented a low risk of bias. HBSS medium showed a superior ratio of cell viability compared to tap water (RR 0.26; 95% CI [0.21, 0.32]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 96%) and saline solution (RR 0.76; 95% CI [0.69, 0.84]; p < 0.0001; I2 = 99%). Herbal medicines showed a similar ratio of cell viability when compared to HBSS (RR 0.97; 95% CI [0.94, 1.00]; p = 0.08; I2 = 50%). Mixed results were observed between milk and HBSS: a superior ratio of HBSS was observed in an overall evaluation (RR 0.26; 95% CI [0.21, 0.32]; p < 0.00001; I2 = 96%), and a similar ratio was achieved when periodontal ligament (PDL) cells were removed prior to immersion in the solution (RR 0.94; 95% CI [0.87, 1.01]; p = 0.10; I2 = 0%) or rinsed in tap water or maintained in open air prior to immersion (RR 0.63; 95% CI [0.35, 1.12]; p = 0.11; I2 = not applicable). This systematic review and MA suggests that milk and herbal medicines could represent an alternative to HBSS. However, more studies are necessary to obtain a reliable conclusion.
本系统评价和荟萃分析(MA)旨在验证不同储存介质在保持牙周膜细胞活力方面的能力,与 Hank's 平衡盐溶液(HBSS)相比。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,进行了搜索、选择过程、数据提取和偏倚风险控制。进行了 5 项 MA 来比较牛奶与 HBSS 之间的细胞活力(1)或连续数据模型(2);自来水与 HBSS(3);草药与 HBSS(4);生理盐水与 HBSS(5)。确定了 693 篇潜在的研究论文,其中 18 篇论文进行了定性分析,8 篇论文进行了定量分析。大多数文章的偏倚风险较低。与自来水(RR 0.26;95%CI [0.21, 0.32];p < 0.00001;I2 = 96%)和生理盐水(RR 0.76;95%CI [0.69, 0.84];p < 0.0001;I2 = 99%)相比,HBSS 培养基显示出更高的细胞活力比值。与 HBSS 相比,草药显示出相似的细胞活力比值(RR 0.97;95%CI [0.94, 1.00];p = 0.08;I2 = 50%)。牛奶与 HBSS 之间的结果存在差异:在总体评估中观察到 HBSS 的比值较高(RR 0.26;95%CI [0.21, 0.32];p < 0.00001;I2 = 96%),在将牙周膜(PDL)细胞浸入溶液之前将其去除时,也获得了相似的比值(RR 0.94;95%CI [0.87, 1.01];p = 0.10;I2 = 0%)或在自来水或在浸入溶液之前在开放空气中冲洗(RR 0.63;95%CI [0.35, 1.12];p = 0.11;I2 = 不适用)。本系统评价和 MA 表明,牛奶和草药可能是 HBSS 的替代品。然而,需要更多的研究来得出可靠的结论。