• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

杏仁核在厌恶图像序列的认知情绪调节过程中的反应和功能连接。

Amygdala response and functional connectivity during cognitive emotion regulation of aversive image sequences.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicin, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Oct;269(7):803-811. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0920-4. Epub 2018 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00406-018-0920-4
PMID:30008118
Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) is crucial in terms of mental health and social functioning. Attention deployment (AD) and cognitive reappraisal (CR) are both efficient cognitive ER strategies, which are based on partially dissociated neural effects. Our understanding of the neural underpinnings of ER is based on laboratory paradigms that study changes of the brain activation related to isolated emotional stimuli. To track the neural response to ER in the changing and dynamic environment of daily life, we extended the common existing paradigms by applying a sequence of emotionally provocative stimuli involving three aversive images. Eighteen participants completed an ER paradigm, in which they had to either shift their attention away from the emotionally negative images by counting backwards (AD strategy) or reinterpret the meaning of stimuli (CR strategy) to attain a down-regulation of affective responses. An increased recruitment of left-sided lateral and medial PFC was shown upon regulation of negative emotions with CR as compared to AD. Remarkably, the amygdala activation showed an increasing pattern of activation during CR. The inverse relationship between PFC and amygdala was compromised during elongated blocks of reappraisal, reflecting a reduction in engagement of the top-down prefrontal regulatory circuitry upon repeated exposure to negative stimuli. These results highlight that temporal dynamic of amygdala response and its functional connectivity differentiates AD and CR strategies in regulating emotions. Findings of the current study underscore the importance of adopting temporally variant approaches for investigating the neural effects of ER. Identifying neural systems that subserve down-regulation of negative emotions is of importance in developing treatment strategies for various forms of psychopathology.

摘要

情绪调节(ER)在心理健康和社交功能方面至关重要。注意部署(AD)和认知重评(CR)都是有效的认知 ER 策略,它们基于部分分离的神经效应。我们对 ER 的神经基础的理解是基于实验室范式,这些范式研究与孤立的情绪刺激相关的大脑激活变化。为了跟踪日常生活中不断变化和动态的环境中的 ER 神经反应,我们通过应用一系列涉及三张令人不快的图像的情感刺激性刺激来扩展常见的现有范式。十八名参与者完成了 ER 范式,他们必须通过倒数(AD 策略)或重新解释刺激的含义(CR 策略)来转移注意力,从而降低情感反应。与 AD 相比,CR 调节负面情绪时显示出左侧外侧和内侧 PFC 的募集增加。值得注意的是,杏仁核在 CR 期间表现出激活增加的模式。在反复暴露于负面刺激时,PFC 和杏仁核之间的反向关系受到损害,反映出在重复接触负面刺激时,自上而下的前额叶调节回路的参与减少。这些结果表明,杏仁核反应的时间动态及其功能连接区分了 AD 和 CR 策略在调节情绪方面的作用。当前研究的结果强调了采用时间变化方法研究 ER 的神经效应的重要性。确定支持负面情绪下调的神经系统对于开发各种形式的精神病理学的治疗策略非常重要。

相似文献

1
Amygdala response and functional connectivity during cognitive emotion regulation of aversive image sequences.杏仁核在厌恶图像序列的认知情绪调节过程中的反应和功能连接。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Oct;269(7):803-811. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0920-4. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
2
Acceptance versus reappraisal: Behavioral, autonomic, and neural effects.接纳与重新评估:行为、自主神经及神经效应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):927-944. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00690-7.
3
The role of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in dorsomedial prefrontal-amygdala neural circuitry during positive-social emotion regulation.扣带回前部下脚在正性社会情绪调节中背内侧前额叶-杏仁核神经回路中的作用。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 1;41(11):3100-3118. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25001. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
Brain networks for engaging oneself in positive-social emotion regulation.参与积极社会情绪调节的大脑网络。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.049. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
5
Lasting effects of cognitive emotion regulation: neural correlates of reinterpretation and distancing.认知情绪调节的持久效应:再解释和距离的神经关联。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):268-279. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa159.
6
Amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during appraisal of symptom-related stimuli in obsessive-compulsive disorder.杏仁核-前额叶连接在强迫障碍症状相关刺激评估中的作用。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jan;49(2):278-286. doi: 10.1017/S003329171800079X. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
7
vlPFC-vmPFC-Amygdala Interactions Underlie Age-Related Differences in Cognitive Regulation of Emotion.腹外侧前额叶皮层-腹内侧前额叶皮层-杏仁核的相互作用是认知调节情绪的年龄相关差异的基础。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jul 1;27(7):3502-3514. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw073.
8
Amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during emotion regulation: A meta-analysis of psychophysiological interactions.杏仁核-前额叶连接在情绪调节中的作用:心理生理交互作用的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Mar 12;153:107767. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107767. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
The VLPFC-Engaged Voluntary Emotion Regulation: Combined TMS-fMRI Evidence for the Neural Circuit of Cognitive Reappraisal.背外侧前额叶皮层参与的自愿情绪调节:认知重评神经回路的 TMS-fMRI 联合证据。
J Neurosci. 2023 Aug 23;43(34):6046-6060. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1337-22.2023. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
10
Impact of short- and long-term mindfulness meditation training on amygdala reactivity to emotional stimuli.短期和长期正念冥想训练对杏仁核对情绪刺激反应的影响。
Neuroimage. 2018 Nov 1;181:301-313. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of lithium administration on brain activity under an emotion regulation paradigm in healthy participants: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.锂剂对健康参与者情绪调节范式下大脑活动的影响:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Aug;240(8):1719-1734. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06395-7. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Brain Activation and Functional Connectivity of Reappraisal and Acceptance for Anxious Events.对焦虑事件的再评价和接纳的大脑激活和功能连接。
eNeuro. 2023 Jun 2;10(6). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0033-23.2023. Print 2023 Jun.
3
Neural Correlates of Reactive Aggression in Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
Amygdala-orbitofrontal structural and functional connectivity in females with anxiety disorders, with and without a history of conduct disorder.焦虑障碍女性患者(伴或不伴品行障碍病史)杏仁核-眶额皮质结构和功能连接
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 18;8(1):1101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19569-7.
2
Cognitive emotion regulation in adulthood and old age: positive gaze preferences across two strategies.成年期和老年期的认知情绪调节:两种策略下的积极注视偏好
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2018 Mar;25(2):213-230. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2017.1279265. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
3
The effect of strategies, goals and stimulus material on the neural mechanisms of emotion regulation: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies.
成人注意力缺陷多动障碍中反应性攻击行为的神经关联
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 19;13:840095. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.840095. eCollection 2022.
4
Separate neural networks of implicit emotional processing between pictures and words: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of brain imaging studies.图片和文字之间内隐情绪加工的分离神经网络:基于脑成像研究的元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:331-344. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
fMRI Neurofeedback-Enhanced Cognitive Reappraisal Training in Depression: A Double-Blind Comparison of Left and Right vlPFC Regulation.抑郁症中功能磁共振成像神经反馈增强认知重评训练:左、右腹外侧前额叶皮层调节的双盲比较
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 23;12:715898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.715898. eCollection 2021.
6
Should we keep some distance from distancing? Regulatory and post-regulatory effects of emotion downregulation.我们是否应该与保持距离保持一定距离?情绪调节的监管和监管后效应。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0255800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255800. eCollection 2021.
7
The Current Evidence Levels for Biofeedback and Neurofeedback Interventions in Treating Depression: A Narrative Review.生物反馈和神经反馈干预治疗抑郁症的当前证据水平:叙事性综述。
Neural Plast. 2021 Feb 4;2021:8878857. doi: 10.1155/2021/8878857. eCollection 2021.
8
Rt-fMRI neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training modulates amygdala responsivity in posttraumatic stress disorder.rt-fMRI 神经反馈引导的认知重评训练调节创伤后应激障碍的杏仁核反应性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102483. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102483. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
9
Cerebral blood flow in 5- to 8-month-olds: Regional tissue maturity is associated with infant affect.5 至 8 个月婴儿的脑血流:区域组织成熟度与婴儿的情感相关。
Dev Sci. 2020 Sep;23(5):e12928. doi: 10.1111/desc.12928. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
策略、目标和刺激材料对情绪调节神经机制的影响:功能磁共振成像研究的荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Jan;72:111-128. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
4
Reappraisal and Distraction Emotion Regulation Strategies Are Associated with Distinct Patterns of Visual Attention and Differing Levels of Cognitive Demand.重新评估和分心情绪调节策略与不同的视觉注意模式及不同水平的认知需求相关。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):e0162290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162290. eCollection 2016.
5
Neural correlates of immediate and prolonged effects of cognitive reappraisal and distraction on emotional experience.认知重评和分心对情绪体验的即时和长期影响的神经相关物。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Oct;11(5):1227-1237. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9603-9.
6
Emotion Regulation in Schema Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy.图式疗法和辩证行为疗法中的情绪调节
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 14;7:1373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01373. eCollection 2016.
7
Neuroimaging cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations to define neural targets for enhancing emotion regulation. A systematic review.临床人群中的神经影像学认知重评,以确定增强情绪调节的神经靶点。一项系统综述。
Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:105-116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Executive and semantic processes in reappraisal of negative stimuli: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.重新评估负面刺激时的执行和语义过程:来自神经影像学研究荟萃分析的见解
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 13;6:956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00956. eCollection 2015.
9
Prefrontal-Amygdala Dysregulation to Threat in Pediatric Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.儿童创伤后应激障碍中前额叶-杏仁核面对威胁时的调节异常
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Feb;41(3):822-31. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.209. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
10
Cognitive Emotion Regulation: Insights from Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.认知情绪调节:来自社会认知与情感神经科学的见解
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;17(2):153-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00566.x.