• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态轮廓眼压计与非接触眼压计在伴有头痛或视力丧失的老年患者中的比较。

Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss.

作者信息

Ing Edsel, Zhang Angela, Michaelov Evan, Wang Wendy

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Open Ophthalmol J. 2018 Jun 22;12:104-109. doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010104. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2174/1874364101812010104
PMID:30008972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6018127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dynamic Contour Tonometry (DCT) is touted to be the most accurate tonometer for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement. Non-Contact "air puff" Tonometry (NCT) may be the most commonly used tonometer for screening of IOP. Elevated IOP is important to exclude in patients presenting with headache or vision loss.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the agreement between DCT and NCT.

METHODS

The IOP of adult patients 50 years of age or older presenting with headache or vision loss for possible temporal artery biopsy were prospectively recorded. NCT and DCT measurements were obtained within thirty minutes. The right eye IOP measurements were compared with paired t-test, and Bland- Altman plot analysis. The left eye IOP measurements were subsequently analyzed for confirmation of results.

RESULTS

There were 106 subjects with complete right eye data, and 104 subjects with complete left eye data. The average age was 72 years, and 70% were female. The NCT IOP was on average 3.9 mm Hg lower in the right eye, and 3.5 mm Hg lower in the left eye compared with DCT. (p<.001) In the right eye the Bland-Altman analysis showed the 95% agreement interval between the two tonometers was -2.5 to 10.4 mmHg and in the left eye -3.0 to 9.9 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

The IOP from NCT and DCT should not be used interchangeably because their level of disagreement includes clinically important discrepancies of up to 10 mm Hg.

摘要

背景

动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)被誉为测量眼压(IOP)最准确的眼压计。非接触式“吹气”眼压计(NCT)可能是筛查眼压最常用的眼压计。对于出现头痛或视力丧失的患者,排除眼压升高很重要。

目的

确定DCT和NCT之间的一致性。

方法

前瞻性记录50岁及以上因可能的颞动脉活检而出现头痛或视力丧失的成年患者的眼压。在30分钟内获得NCT和DCT测量值。右眼眼压测量值采用配对t检验和Bland-Altman图分析进行比较。随后对左眼眼压测量值进行分析以确认结果。

结果

有106名受试者有完整的右眼数据,104名受试者有完整的左眼数据。平均年龄为72岁,70%为女性。与DCT相比,右眼NCT眼压平均低3.9 mmHg,左眼低3.5 mmHg。(p<0.001)在右眼,Bland-Altman分析显示两种眼压计之间的95%一致性区间为-2.5至10.4 mmHg,在左眼为-3.0至9.9 mmHg。

结论

NCT和DCT测得的眼压不应互换使用,因为它们的差异水平包括高达10 mmHg的具有临床重要意义的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b6/6018127/da9ed5e8ba03/TOOPHTJ-12-104_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b6/6018127/da9ed5e8ba03/TOOPHTJ-12-104_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b6/6018127/da9ed5e8ba03/TOOPHTJ-12-104_F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Non-contact Tonometry in Older Patients Presenting with Headache or Vision Loss.动态轮廓眼压计与非接触眼压计在伴有头痛或视力丧失的老年患者中的比较。
Open Ophthalmol J. 2018 Jun 22;12:104-109. doi: 10.2174/1874364101812010104. eCollection 2018.
2
Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure.当前眼压测量技术在眼压测量中的比较。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov 28;29(2):92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.08.010. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
Effects of Acute Atmospheric Pressure Changes on Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Normal Individuals: A Pilot Study.急性大气压力变化对正常个体动态轮廓眼压计和 Goldmann 压平眼压计的影响:一项初步研究。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Sep;29(9):756-760. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001592.
4
Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.近视激光辅助上皮下角膜切除术术后眼压比较:眼压计-角膜测厚仪、压平眼压计、动态轮廓眼压计和非接触眼压计。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):888-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.035.
5
Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?在常规临床实践中,高端眼压计能否互换使用?
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;64(2):132-5. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.179723.
6
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry, rebound tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal and glaucomatous eyes.正常眼和青光眼眼中Goldmann压平眼压计、回弹眼压计和动态轮廓眼压计的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr 18;8(2):299-304. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.15. eCollection 2015.
7
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.动态轮廓眼压测量与非接触眼压测量在高眼压症和青光眼中的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Mar;23(3):663-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.3. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
8
Intraocular pressure profile during the modified diurnal tension curve using Goldman applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.使用Goldmann压平眼压计和动态轮廓眼压计测量改良昼夜眼压曲线期间的眼压情况。
J Ocul Biol Dis Infor. 2009 Feb 24;2(1):29-32. doi: 10.1007/s12177-009-9016-8.
9
Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry.使用动态轮廓眼压计和压平式眼压计测量眼内压和眼脉搏振幅。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar 23;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-4-4.
10
Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.眼压计测量 Goldmann 压平眼压、动态轮廓眼压和眼反应分析仪眼压的精度。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Lower ocular pulse amplitude with dynamic contour tonometry is associated with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis.动态轮廓眼压测量的较低眼脉冲振幅与活检证实的巨细胞动脉炎相关。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;53(3):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
2
Central corneal thickness in children.儿童的中央角膜厚度
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Sep;129(9):1132-8. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.225.
3
IOP measured by dynamic contour tonometry correlates with IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry in Japanese individuals.
动态轮廓眼压计测量的IOP 与日本人群中 Goldmann 压平眼压计和非接触眼压计测量的 IOP 相关。
J Glaucoma. 2012 Jan;21(1):35-40. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820275b4.
4
A history of intraocular pressure and its measurement.眼压及其测量的历史。
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Jan;88(1):E16-28. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318205a4e7.
5
Correlation, agreement, and Bland-Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies.相关性、一致性及布兰德-奥特曼分析:方法比较研究的统计分析
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.09.032.
6
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.动态轮廓眼压测量与非接触眼压测量在高眼压症和青光眼中的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Mar;23(3):663-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.3. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
7
Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者中帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计、托诺笔眼压计和戈德曼压平眼压计的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 May;85(3):272-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x.
8
Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus non-contact tonometry (NCT): a comparison study.动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)与非接触眼压计(NCT):一项比较研究。
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2005(298):63-9.
9
A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.四种眼压测量方法的比较:方法一致性和观察者间变异性
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;89(7):847-50. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614.
10
The cornea in young myopic adults.年轻近视成年人的角膜。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Aug;85(8):916-20. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.8.916.