School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
IBM Research Australia, Melbourne, Australia.
Malar J. 2018 Aug 17;17(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2442-y.
Much of the extensive research regarding transmission of malaria is underpinned by mathematical modelling. Compartmental models, which focus on interactions and transitions between population strata, have been a mainstay of such modelling for more than a century. However, modellers are increasingly adopting agent-based approaches, which model hosts, vectors and/or their interactions on an individual level. One reason for the increasing popularity of such models is their potential to provide enhanced realism by allowing system-level behaviours to emerge as a consequence of accumulated individual-level interactions, as occurs in real populations.
A systematic review of 90 articles published between 1998 and May 2018 was performed, characterizing agent-based models (ABMs) relevant to malaria transmission. The review provides an overview of approaches used to date, determines the advantages of these approaches, and proposes ideas for progressing the field.
The rationale for ABM use over other modelling approaches centres around three points: the need to accurately represent increased stochasticity in low-transmission settings; the benefits of high-resolution spatial simulations; and heterogeneities in drug and vaccine efficacies due to individual patient characteristics. The success of these approaches provides avenues for further exploration of agent-based techniques for modelling malaria transmission. Potential extensions include varying elimination strategies across spatial landscapes, extending the size of spatial models, incorporating human movement dynamics, and developing increasingly comprehensive parameter estimation and optimization techniques.
Collectively, the literature covers an extensive array of topics, including the full spectrum of transmission and intervention regimes. Bringing these elements together under a common framework may enhance knowledge of, and guide policies towards, malaria elimination. However, because of the diversity of available models, endorsing a standardized approach to ABM implementation may not be possible. Instead it is recommended that model frameworks be contextually appropriate and sufficiently described. One key recommendation is to develop enhanced parameter estimation and optimization techniques. Extensions of current techniques will provide the robust results required to enhance current elimination efforts.
疟疾传播的大量广泛研究都以数学建模为基础。一百多年来,重点研究人群层次之间相互作用和转变的房室模型一直是此类建模的主要方法。然而,建模人员越来越多地采用基于主体的方法,这些方法在个体层面上对宿主、媒介和/或它们的相互作用进行建模。这些模型越来越受欢迎的原因之一是,它们通过允许系统级行为作为个体级相互作用的结果出现,从而提供更高的现实性,这在真实人群中会发生。
对 1998 年至 2018 年 5 月期间发表的 90 篇文章进行了系统回顾,描述了与疟疾传播相关的基于主体的模型 (ABM)。该综述概述了迄今为止使用的方法,确定了这些方法的优势,并提出了推进该领域的想法。
与其他建模方法相比,使用 ABM 的基本原理主要集中在三个方面:需要准确表示低传播环境中增加的随机性;高分辨率空间模拟的好处;以及由于个体患者特征而导致药物和疫苗疗效的异质性。这些方法的成功为进一步探索基于主体的疟疾传播建模技术提供了途径。潜在的扩展包括在空间景观中改变消除策略,扩大空间模型的规模,纳入人类运动动态,并开发越来越全面的参数估计和优化技术。
总的来说,文献涵盖了广泛的主题,包括整个传播和干预制度的范围。将这些元素整合到一个共同的框架下,可能会增加对疟疾消除的认识,并指导相关政策。然而,由于现有模型的多样性,不可能支持 ABM 实施的标准化方法。相反,建议模型框架要符合上下文,并进行充分描述。一个关键建议是开发增强的参数估计和优化技术。当前技术的扩展将提供增强当前消除工作所需的稳健结果。