• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对气候引发灾害的韧性及其对南部非洲福祉的总体影响:一项混合方法系统评价研究方案。

Resilience to climate-induced disasters and its overall impact on well-being in Southern Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.

机构信息

School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

World Vision International, Southern Africa Regional Office, Mbabane, Swaziland.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;7(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0796-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-018-0796-4
PMID:30131077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6103869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Southern Africa has long been vulnerable to climate-induced disasters, especially droughts and floods. The severity and frequency of disasters increased in the early 1980s, continuously eroding livelihoods, which in turn invoked humanitarian intervention. A systematic review of the relationship between resilience to drought and well-being will be undertaken.

METHODS

Studies will be included if they were conducted between January 1980 and December 2017; used quantitative and/or qualitative methods; were peer reviewed or comprise grey literature; covered Southern Africa; and measured resilience and its relationship to well-being. Data extraction will be informed by the Cochrane Public Health Group and the Joanna Briggs Institute manuals. The quality of evidence of the studies included will be assessed for risk bias, psychometric properties of tools used, and their suitability. The findings will be summarised into themes and narrated.

DISCUSSION

This protocol is guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. The protocol gives insight of the scope and parameters for the systematic review to be carried out. The systematic review will establish how resilience to climate-induced disasters affects well-being. It will also provide recommendations to improve humanitarian coordination in Southern Africa.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The protocol was registered by the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews, reference CRD42017064396 .

摘要

背景

南部非洲长期以来一直容易受到气候引发的灾害的影响,尤其是干旱和洪水。20 世纪 80 年代初,灾害的严重程度和频率不断增加,持续侵蚀着生计,从而引发了人道主义干预。将对干旱适应力与福祉之间的关系进行系统综述。

方法

如果研究是在 1980 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月之间进行的;使用定量和/或定性方法;经过同行评审或包含灰色文献;涵盖南部非洲;并衡量适应力及其与福祉的关系,则将包括这些研究。数据提取将参考 Cochrane 公共卫生组和 Joanna Briggs 研究所手册。将评估纳入研究的证据质量,包括风险偏倚、使用工具的心理测量学特性及其适用性。研究结果将以主题的形式进行总结和叙述。

讨论

本方案受系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南指导。该方案提供了进行系统综述的范围和参数的见解。系统综述将确定气候引发的灾害对福祉的适应力如何影响。它还将为改善南部非洲的人道主义协调提供建议。

系统评价注册

该方案已由 PROSPERO 国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心注册,参考 CRD42017064396 。

相似文献

1
Resilience to climate-induced disasters and its overall impact on well-being in Southern Africa: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol.应对气候引发灾害的韧性及其对南部非洲福祉的总体影响:一项混合方法系统评价研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 21;7(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0796-4.
2
Resilience to Climate-Induced Disasters and Its Overall Relationship to Well-Being in Southern Africa: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.南方非洲地区气候灾害韧性及其与整体福祉的关系:混合方法系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 26;15(11):2375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112375.
3
Psychological resilience during COVID-19: a meta-review protocol.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间的心理弹性:荟萃回顾方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 18;11(6):e051417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051417.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The Association between Post-Migration Nutrition and Lifestyle Transition and the Risk of Developing Chronic Diseases among Sub-Saharan African Migrants: A Mixed Method Systematic Review Protocol.撒哈拉以南非洲移民的移民后营养和生活方式转变与慢性病发病风险之间的关系:一项混合方法系统评价研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;18(9):4706. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094706.
6
Effective components of exercise and physical activity-related behaviour-change interventions for chronic non-communicable diseases in Africa: protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with meta-analysis.非洲慢性非传染性疾病运动及与身体活动相关行为改变干预措施的有效组成部分:一项采用荟萃分析的系统混合研究综述方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 12;5(8):e008036. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008036.
7
Nutrition interventions for children aged less than 5 years following natural disasters: a systematic review protocol.自然灾害后5岁以下儿童的营养干预措施:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 30;5(11):e009525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009525.
8
Epidemiology of substance use and mental health disorders among forced migrants displaced from the MENAT region: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.中东、北非和土耳其地区被迫流离失所的移民中物质使用和精神健康障碍的流行病学:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292535. eCollection 2023.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the psychological impact of climate-induced disasters on young people in Africa: Challenges and pathways forward.应对气候引发的灾害对非洲年轻人的心理影响:挑战与前进路径。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 May 23;12:e50. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.77. eCollection 2025.
2
Drought Influences on Food Insecurity in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review.干旱对非洲粮食不安全的影响:系统文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 14;17(16):5897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165897.
3
Understanding disaster resilience in communities affected by recurrent drought in Lesotho and Swaziland-A qualitative study.了解莱索托和斯威士兰受反复干旱影响社区的抗灾能力:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 1;14(3):e0212994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212994. eCollection 2019.
4
Resilience to Climate-Induced Disasters and Its Overall Relationship to Well-Being in Southern Africa: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.南方非洲地区气候灾害韧性及其与整体福祉的关系:混合方法系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 26;15(11):2375. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112375.

本文引用的文献

1
An Agenda to Advance Integrative Resilience Research and Practice: Key Themes From a Resilience Roundtable.推进综合复原力研究与实践的议程:复原力圆桌会议的关键主题
Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 1;7(1):5. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Building Community Resilience to Disasters: A Way Forward to Enhance National Health Security.增强社区抗灾能力:提升国家卫生安全的前进之路。
Rand Health Q. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):6. eCollection 2011 Spring.
3
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
4
Optimal health literacy measurement for the clinical setting: A systematic review.临床环境中最佳健康素养测量方法:一项系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98(11):1295-307. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
6
Urbanisation, urbanicity, and health: a systematic review of the reliability and validity of urbanicity scales.城市化、城市性与健康:城市性量表的信度和效度的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 28;13:513. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-513.
7
Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead.绿色革命:影响、局限及未来之路。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 31;109(31):12302-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912953109. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
8
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
9
The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content.COSMIN 清单用于评估测量特性研究的方法学质量:对其内容的澄清。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
10
Quantifying the urban environment: a scale measure of urbanicity outperforms the urban-rural dichotomy.量化城市环境:城市性的量表测量优于城乡二分法。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Apr;64(7):1407-19. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.019. Epub 2006 Dec 29.