Department of Psychology,University of Essex,Wivenhoe Park,Colchester,Essex,CO4 3SQ,UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(17):3168-3177. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002021. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
The study examined two components of consumer understanding of food energy information: understanding the concept of energy and its quantity. Using this new framework, we investigated whether activity-equivalent labels facilitated interpretations of food energy compared with calorie labels and whether an image format would strengthen this facilitative effect compared with text.
We assessed the effect of energy representation and format in a 2 (activity v. calories)×2 (image v. text) between-subjects design. Conceptual understanding of energy was measured in terms of level of understanding and personal engagement. Quantitative understanding was measured in terms of participants' estimations of a food's contribution to their recommended daily intake and perceptions of energy values as precise or single-bound interval estimates.
The experiment was conducted online through Qualtrics.
Eight hundred and twelve participants (55 % female, age range 18-74 years) were recruited through a national survey panel in the UK.
Participants were twice more likely to have a stronger conceptual understanding of energy and four times more likely to personally engage with activity labels v. calorie labels. Participants did not differ across labels in their estimations of energy quantities; however, they inferred quantities to mean exactly the stated number of calories, but at least the stated activity duration. There were no added benefits in presenting an image over the text format.
Activity labels can facilitate conceptual understanding of energy, but may be subject to quantitative misinterpretations. Nutrition communication should consider what people infer from quantities represented on labels.
本研究考察了消费者对食物能量信息理解的两个方面:理解能量的概念及其数量。使用这个新框架,我们调查了活动等效标签是否比卡路里标签更有助于对食物能量的解释,以及图像格式是否比文本格式更能增强这种促进作用。
我们在 2(活动与卡路里)×2(图像与文本)的被试间设计中评估了能量表示和格式的效果。能量的概念理解是通过理解水平和个人参与来衡量的。定量理解是通过参与者对食物对其推荐日摄入量的贡献的估计以及对能量值的感知来衡量的,即精确或单一区间估计。
该实验通过 Qualtrics 在线进行。
812 名参与者(55%为女性,年龄在 18-74 岁之间)通过英国的一个全国调查小组招募。
与卡路里标签相比,参与者更有可能对活动标签有更强的概念理解,并且更有可能亲自参与活动标签。参与者在对能量数量的估计上没有因标签而有所不同;然而,他们推断出的数量正好是所表示的卡路里数量,但至少是所表示的活动持续时间。在呈现图像格式与文本格式相比没有额外的好处。
活动标签可以促进对能量的概念理解,但可能会导致数量的误解。营养信息交流应该考虑人们从标签上表示的数量中推断出的内容。