• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Conceptual understanding and quantity inferences: a new framework for examining consumer understanding of food energy.概念理解和数量推理:检验消费者对食物能量理解的新框架。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(17):3168-3177. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002021. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
Two online randomised controlled trials examining effects of alcohol calorie labelling on hypothetical ordering of calories from alcohol and food.两项在线随机对照试验研究了酒精卡路里标签对酒精和食物卡路里假设点餐的影响。
Appetite. 2024 Sep 1;200:107548. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107548. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
Physical activity calorie expenditure (PACE) labels in worksite cafeterias: effects on physical activity.工作场所自助餐厅的身体活动热量消耗(PACE)标签:对身体活动的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 29;19(1):1596. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7960-1.
4
Potential Effect of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) Labeling on Adult Fast Food Ordering and Exercise.体力活动卡路里当量(PACE)标签对成年人快餐订购和运动的潜在影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0134289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134289. eCollection 2015.
5
Do calorie labels change energy purchased in a simulated online food delivery platform? A multi-arm randomised controlled trial.热量标签是否会改变在模拟在线食品配送平台上购买的能量?一项多臂随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 17;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01638-y.
6
Body dissatisfaction and beyond: Investigating attitudes towards calorie labels on UK food menus.身体不满及其他:调查英国食品菜单上卡路里标签的态度。
Appetite. 2024 Aug 1;199:107418. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107418. Epub 2024 May 15.
7
The Differential Effects of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent Labeling on Consumer Preferences for Healthy and Unhealthy Food Products: Evidence from a Choice Experiment.体力活动能量等效标签对消费者对健康和不健康食品产品偏好的差异影响:来自选择实验的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 14;18(4):1860. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041860.
8
Attitude and Behavior Factors Associated with Front-of-Package Label Use with Label Users Making Accurate Product Nutrition Assessments.与标签使用者准确评估产品营养状况相关的与态度和行为因素有关的包装正面标签使用。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):904-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
9
Effect of calories-only vs physical activity calorie expenditure labeling on lunch calories purchased in worksite cafeterias.仅热量与体力活动热量支出标签对工作场所自助餐厅购买午餐卡路里量的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 23;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6433-x.
10
US Consumers' Understanding of Nutrition Labels in 2013: The Importance of Health Literacy.2013 年美国消费者对营养标签的理解:健康素养的重要性。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Sep 28;14:E86. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170066.

引用本文的文献

1
The intuitive use of contextual information in decisions made with verbal and numerical quantifiers.在使用语言和数字量词进行决策时对上下文信息的直观运用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Apr;73(4):481-494. doi: 10.1177/1747021820903439. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of calorie and physical activity labelling on snack and beverage choices.卡路里和身体活动标签对零食及饮料选择的影响。
Appetite. 2017 May 1;112:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
2
Menu labelling is effective in reducing energy ordered and consumed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent studies.菜单标注在减少点餐和摄入的能量方面是有效的:近期研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Aug;19(12):2106-21. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015003468. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
3
Front of Pack Labels Enhance Attention to Nutrition Information in Novel & Commercial Brands.包装正面标签可提高对新品牌和商业品牌营养信息的关注度。
Food Policy. 2015 Oct 1;56:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.08.001.
4
Communicating numeric quantities in context: implications for decision science and rationality claims.在具体情境中传达数值量:对决策科学和理性主张的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 30;6:537. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00537. eCollection 2015.
5
The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: a systematic review and meta-analysis.菜单标签对所选择或摄入卡路里的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Sep;114(9):1375-1388.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
6
Do framing effects reveal irrational choice?框架效应是否揭示了非理性选择?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1185-98. doi: 10.1037/a0034207. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
7
Simplifying healthful choices: a qualitative study of a physical activity based nutrition label format.简化健康选择:基于身体活动的营养标签格式的定性研究。
Nutr J. 2013 Jun 6;12:72. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-72.
8
Verbal probabilities: an alternative approach.言语概率:一种替代方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(1):124-46. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.793731. Epub 2013 May 28.
9
Consumer understanding of calorie amounts and serving size: implications for nutritional labelling.消费者对卡路里含量和份量的理解:对营养标签的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2012 Jul 18;103(5):e327-31. doi: 10.1007/BF03404435.
10
What types of nutrition menu labelling lead consumers to select less energy-dense fast food? An experimental study.哪些类型的营养菜单标签会促使消费者选择低能量密度的快餐?一项实验研究。
Appetite. 2013 Aug;67:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

概念理解和数量推理:检验消费者对食物能量理解的新框架。

Conceptual understanding and quantity inferences: a new framework for examining consumer understanding of food energy.

机构信息

Department of Psychology,University of Essex,Wivenhoe Park,Colchester,Essex,CO4 3SQ,UK.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(17):3168-3177. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002021. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980018002021
PMID:30132428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10260843/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study examined two components of consumer understanding of food energy information: understanding the concept of energy and its quantity. Using this new framework, we investigated whether activity-equivalent labels facilitated interpretations of food energy compared with calorie labels and whether an image format would strengthen this facilitative effect compared with text.

DESIGN

We assessed the effect of energy representation and format in a 2 (activity v. calories)×2 (image v. text) between-subjects design. Conceptual understanding of energy was measured in terms of level of understanding and personal engagement. Quantitative understanding was measured in terms of participants' estimations of a food's contribution to their recommended daily intake and perceptions of energy values as precise or single-bound interval estimates.

SETTING

The experiment was conducted online through Qualtrics.

SUBJECTS

Eight hundred and twelve participants (55 % female, age range 18-74 years) were recruited through a national survey panel in the UK.

RESULTS

Participants were twice more likely to have a stronger conceptual understanding of energy and four times more likely to personally engage with activity labels v. calorie labels. Participants did not differ across labels in their estimations of energy quantities; however, they inferred quantities to mean exactly the stated number of calories, but at least the stated activity duration. There were no added benefits in presenting an image over the text format.

CONCLUSIONS

Activity labels can facilitate conceptual understanding of energy, but may be subject to quantitative misinterpretations. Nutrition communication should consider what people infer from quantities represented on labels.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了消费者对食物能量信息理解的两个方面:理解能量的概念及其数量。使用这个新框架,我们调查了活动等效标签是否比卡路里标签更有助于对食物能量的解释,以及图像格式是否比文本格式更能增强这种促进作用。

设计

我们在 2(活动与卡路里)×2(图像与文本)的被试间设计中评估了能量表示和格式的效果。能量的概念理解是通过理解水平和个人参与来衡量的。定量理解是通过参与者对食物对其推荐日摄入量的贡献的估计以及对能量值的感知来衡量的,即精确或单一区间估计。

设置

该实验通过 Qualtrics 在线进行。

受试者

812 名参与者(55%为女性,年龄在 18-74 岁之间)通过英国的一个全国调查小组招募。

结果

与卡路里标签相比,参与者更有可能对活动标签有更强的概念理解,并且更有可能亲自参与活动标签。参与者在对能量数量的估计上没有因标签而有所不同;然而,他们推断出的数量正好是所表示的卡路里数量,但至少是所表示的活动持续时间。在呈现图像格式与文本格式相比没有额外的好处。

结论

活动标签可以促进对能量的概念理解,但可能会导致数量的误解。营养信息交流应该考虑人们从标签上表示的数量中推断出的内容。