Suppr超能文献

三种光学生物测量仪的比较:IOLMaster 500、Lenstar LS 900和阿拉丁。

Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin.

作者信息

Ortiz Alvaro, Galvis Virgilio, Tello Alejandro, Viaña Victor, Corrales Maria Isabel, Ochoa Miguel, Rodriguez Carlos Julián

机构信息

Centro Oftalmológico Aljaorza, Second Floor, Machala, Ecuador.

Centro Oftalmológico Virgilio Galvis, Floridablanca, Colombia.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;39(8):1809-1818. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-1006-z. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of optical biometry using the IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin in eyes with cataract.

METHODS

In 231 eyes of 152 patients with cataract, the measurements of 3 different biometers were retrospectively compared. Paired comparisons were performed for axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K) and anterior chamber depth (ACD).

RESULTS

In only 197 of the 231 eyes (85.3%), it was possible to obtain reliable measurements of AL with all the three devices. It was not possible to determine AL in 16 eyes (6.9%) with Lenstar LS 900; in 19 eyes (8.2%) with Aladdin; and in 20 eyes (8.6%) with IOLMaster 500 possibly related to the severity of lens opacification (the corneas had good transparency in the eyes included in the study). There was a statistically significant difference in AL between IOLMaster 500 and the remaining two biometers (P = 0.03). However, the amount of difference was considered clinically not significant (0.04 mm). The mean keratometry (mean K) was determined in 203 eyes (87.9%) with all the three devices. Differences in mean K were between - 0.1 and 0.06 Diopters (D), which were considered neither statistically (P > 0.05) nor clinically significant. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) was determined in 197 eyes (85.28%) with all the three biometers. The differences between the three devices (0.03 to 0.13 mm) were not statistically significant and considered also clinically not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no clinically significant differences between these 3 biometers in AL, mean K and ACD.

摘要

目的

评估使用IOLMaster 500、Lenstar LS 900和阿拉丁光学生物测量仪对白内障患者眼睛进行测量的结果。

方法

对152例白内障患者的231只眼睛进行回顾性研究,比较三种不同生物测量仪的测量结果。对眼轴长度(AL)、平均角膜曲率(平均K)和前房深度(ACD)进行配对比较。

结果

在231只眼中,只有197只眼(85.3%)使用这三种仪器都能获得可靠的AL测量值。Lenstar LS 900在16只眼(6.9%)中无法测定AL;阿拉丁在19只眼(8.2%)中无法测定;IOLMaster 500在20只眼(8.6%)中无法测定,这可能与晶状体混浊的严重程度有关(纳入研究的眼睛角膜透明度良好)。IOLMaster 500与其余两种生物测量仪在AL上存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.03)。然而,差异量在临床上被认为不显著(0.04mm)。三种仪器均在203只眼(87.9%)中测定了平均角膜曲率(平均K)。平均K的差异在-0.1至0.06屈光度(D)之间,在统计学上(P>0.05)和临床上均无显著意义。三种生物测量仪均在197只眼(85.28%)中测定了前房深度(ACD)。三种仪器之间的差异(0.03至0.13mm)无统计学意义,在临床上也无显著意义。

结论

这三种生物测量仪在AL、平均K和ACD方面无临床显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验