• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶时使用手机的法律和机动车驾驶员死亡人数:人口亚组和地点的差异。

Cell phone use while driving laws and motor vehicle driver fatalities: differences in population subgroups and location.

机构信息

Injury Control Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown.

School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.015
PMID:30143355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6486885/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Research suggests that cell phone use while driving laws are associated with lower driver fatalities. This study seeks to determine whether this relationship is modified by driver age (16-24, 25-39, 40-59, ≥60), sex (male, female), race/ethnicity (white non-Hispanic, white Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, other), or rurality (rural, urban).

METHODS

Fatality Analysis Reporting System data were merged with state legislation (2000-2014). The exposure was the type of legislation in effect. The outcome was non-alcohol-related driver fatalities by state-quarter-year. Incident rate ratios were estimated using generalized Poisson mixed regression for overdispersed count data with robust standard errors.

RESULTS

Amongst 190,544 drivers, compared to periods without bans, universal hand-held calling bans were associated with 10% (adjusted incident rate ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.84, 0.96) lower non-alcohol-related driver fatalities overall and up to 13% lower fatalities across all age groups and sexes but not for race/ethnicity or rurality. When comparing state-quarter-years with bans to those without, universal texting bans were not associated with lower fatalities overall or for any demographic group.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationships between cell phone laws and non-alcohol-related driver fatalities are modified by driver demographics, particularly for universal hand-held bans. Universal hand-held calling bans may benefit more types of drivers compared to texting bans.

摘要

目的

研究表明,驾驶时使用手机的法律与较低的驾驶员死亡率有关。本研究旨在确定这种关系是否因驾驶员年龄(16-24 岁、25-39 岁、40-59 岁、≥60 岁)、性别(男性、女性)、种族/民族(白种非西班牙裔、白种西班牙裔、黑种非西班牙裔、其他)或农村/城市地区(农村、城市)而有所不同。

方法

将伤亡分析报告系统的数据与州立法(2000-2014 年)合并。暴露因素是有效的立法类型。结果是非酒精相关的驾驶员按州季度的死亡人数。使用广义泊松混合回归模型对过离散计数数据进行分析,并采用稳健标准误差进行估计。

结果

在 190544 名驾驶员中,与无禁令期相比,普遍禁止手持电话拨打的法律与整体非酒精相关驾驶员死亡率降低 10%(调整后的发病率比=0.90,95%置信区间 0.84,0.96),并且在所有年龄段和性别中降低了高达 13%的死亡率,但在种族/民族或农村/城市地区没有降低。在将有禁令的州季度与无禁令的州季度进行比较时,普遍禁止发短信的法律与整体死亡率或任何年龄组的死亡率均无关联。

结论

手机法律与非酒精相关驾驶员死亡率之间的关系因驾驶员人口统计学特征而有所不同,特别是对于普遍禁止手持设备的法律。与禁止发短信的法律相比,普遍禁止手持电话拨打的法律可能对更多类型的驾驶员有益。

相似文献

1
Cell phone use while driving laws and motor vehicle driver fatalities: differences in population subgroups and location.驾驶时使用手机的法律和机动车驾驶员死亡人数:人口亚组和地点的差异。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
2
Hand-held cell phone use while driving legislation and observed driver behavior among population sub-groups in the United States.美国关于驾驶时使用手持手机的立法以及不同人群亚组的驾驶员行为观察
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 12;17(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4373-x.
3
Association between cellphone use while driving legislation and self-reported behaviour among adult drivers in USA: a cross-sectional study.美国驾驶时使用手机立法与成年司机自我报告行为之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 18;9(2):e023456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023456.
4
Bans on Cellphone Use While Driving and Traffic Fatalities in the United States.美国的开车时禁止使用手机和交通死亡人数。
Epidemiology. 2021 Sep 1;32(5):731-739. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001391.
5
Distracted Driving Laws and Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities.分心驾驶法规与机动车事故死亡人数
Pediatrics. 2020 Jun;145(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3621. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
Cellphone Legislation and Self-Reported Behaviors Among Subgroups of Adolescent U.S. Drivers.青少年美国司机群体的手机立法和自我报告行为。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 May;62(5):618-625. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.12.001. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
7
The association between states' texting regulations and the prevalence of texting while driving among U.S. high school students.美国各州短信使用规定与美国高中生边开车边发短信的普遍程度之间的关联。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
8
Impact of texting laws on motor vehicular fatalities in the United States.美国 texting 法规对机动车死亡事故的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Aug;104(8):1370-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301894. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
9
Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.美国 1999 年至 2008 年因分心驾驶导致的死亡趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2213-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
10
Demographic characteristics and trends of cell phone use while driving citations in selected states in the United States, 2010-2020.2010-2020 年美国部分州开车时使用手机罚单的人口统计学特征和趋势。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(6):788-794. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2351605. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Short-term impacts of all-driver handheld cellphone bans on high-schoolers' texting while driving: quasi-experimental analyses of Illinois and Georgia.全司机手持手机禁令对高中生驾车时发短信行为的短期影响:伊利诺伊州和佐治亚州的准实验分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 May;184:107014. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107014. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Cellphone laws and teens' calling while driving: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019.手机法律与青少年驾车时打电话:对2013年、2015年、2017年和2019年重复横断面调查的分析
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Dec 3;7(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00290-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.自然主义驾驶研究中测量的与手机任务相关的安全关键事件风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Feb;87:161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
2
The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations.短信禁令对机动车碰撞相关住院情况的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):859-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302537. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
The association of graduated driver licensing with miles driven and fatal crash rates per miles driven among adolescents.分级驾驶员执照与青少年行驶里程及每英里行驶里程的致命撞车率之间的关联。
Inj Prev. 2015 Apr;21(e1):e23-7. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040999. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
4
Cellphone bans and fatal motor vehicle crash rates in the United States.美国的手机禁令与致命机动车碰撞事故率。
J Public Health Policy. 2013 May;34(2):197-212. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.3. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
Traffic citation rates among drivers of different residency status in the United States.美国不同居住身份驾驶员的交通违章罚单率。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;51:215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
6
An examination of the environmental, driver and vehicle factors associated with the serious and fatal crashes of older rural drivers.对与老年农村驾驶员严重和致命事故相关的环境、驾驶员和车辆因素的研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:768-75. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.028. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
7
Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers.驾考改革与 16 至 19 岁青少年驾驶员致命事故
JAMA. 2011 Sep 14;306(10):1098-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1277.
8
Age and gender differences in risky driving: the roles of positive affect and risk perception.年龄和性别与冒险驾驶的差异:积极情绪和风险感知的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 May;43(3):923-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.015. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
9
Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008.美国 1999 年至 2008 年因分心驾驶导致的死亡趋势。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2213-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
10
Phoning while driving II: a review of driving conditions influence.驾车时打电话 II:驾驶条件影响综述。
Ergonomics. 2010 May;53(5):602-16. doi: 10.1080/00140131003769092.