a Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway (NCMM), Nordic EMBL Partnership , University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway.
b Key Lab of Bioinformatics/Bioinformatics Division, BNRIST (Beijing National Research Center for Information Science and Technology), Department of Automation , Tsinghua University , Beijing , China.
Epigenetics. 2018;13(9):910-922. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2018.1514231. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
Super-enhancers and stretch enhancers represent classes of transcriptional enhancers that have been shown to control the expression of cell identity genes and carry disease- and trait-associated variants. Specifically, super-enhancers are clusters of enhancers defined based on the binding occupancy of master transcription factors, chromatin regulators, or chromatin marks, while stretch enhancers are large chromatin-defined regulatory regions of at least 3,000 base pairs. Several studies have characterized these regulatory regions in numerous cell types and tissues to decipher their functional importance. However, the differences and similarities between these regulatory regions have not been fully assessed. We integrated genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic data from ten human cell types to perform a comparative analysis of super and stretch enhancers with respect to their chromatin profiles, cell type-specificity, and ability to control gene expression. We found that stretch enhancers are more abundant, more distal to transcription start sites, cover twice as much the genome, and are significantly less conserved than super-enhancers. In contrast, super-enhancers are significantly more enriched for active chromatin marks and cohesin complex, and more transcriptionally active than stretch enhancers. Importantly, a vast majority of super-enhancers (85%) overlap with only a small subset of stretch enhancers (13%), which are enriched for cell type-specific biological functions, and control cell identity genes. These results suggest that super-enhancers are transcriptionally more active and cell type-specific than stretch enhancers, and importantly, most of the stretch enhancers that are distinct from super-enhancers do not show an association with cell identity genes, are less active, and more likely to be poised enhancers.
超级增强子和伸展增强子代表了一类转录增强子,它们被证明可以控制细胞身份基因的表达,并携带疾病和特征相关的变异。具体来说,超级增强子是根据主转录因子、染色质调节剂或染色质标记的结合占有率定义的增强子簇,而伸展增强子是至少 3000 个碱基对的大染色质定义的调控区域。几项研究已经在许多细胞类型和组织中对这些调控区域进行了特征描述,以解析它们的功能重要性。然而,这些调控区域之间的差异和相似之处尚未得到充分评估。我们整合了来自十个人类细胞类型的基因组、表观基因组和转录组数据,对超级和伸展增强子进行了比较分析,比较了它们的染色质特征、细胞类型特异性以及控制基因表达的能力。我们发现,伸展增强子更丰富,离转录起始位点更远,覆盖基因组的两倍,并且与超级增强子相比,它们的保守性显著降低。相比之下,超级增强子显著富集了活性染色质标记和黏合复合物,并且比伸展增强子更具转录活性。重要的是,绝大多数超级增强子(85%)只与一小部分伸展增强子(13%)重叠,这些伸展增强子富含细胞类型特异性的生物学功能,并控制细胞身份基因。这些结果表明,超级增强子比伸展增强子在转录上更活跃,细胞类型特异性更强,而且重要的是,与超级增强子不同的伸展增强子大多数与细胞身份基因没有关联,活性较低,更有可能是处于休眠状态的增强子。