• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们是需要“更多研究”,还是通过知识传播来实现更好的实施?

Do we need "more research" or better implementation through knowledge brokering?

作者信息

Hering Janet G

机构信息

Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.

IBP, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sustain Sci. 2016;11(2):363-369. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0314-8. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11625-015-0314-8
PMID:30174733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6106375/
Abstract

"More research is needed" is an iconic catchphrase used by scientists worldwide. Yet policy and management decisions are continually being made with variable levels of reliance on scientific knowledge. Funding agencies have provided incentives for knowledge exchange at the interfaces between science and policy or practice, yet it remains the exception rather than the rule within academic institutions. An important step forward would be the establishment and professionalization of knowledge brokering (i.e., as a complement to existing technology transfer and communications departments). This would require an explicit commitment of resources by both funding agencies and institutions. Many academic scientists are genuinely interested in the applications of their research. This interest could be stimulated by providing support for the process of knowledge brokering and by integrating the natural, social, and engineering sciences to address broad policy- and practice-relevant questions.

摘要

“需要更多研究”是全球科学家使用的一个标志性口头禅。然而,政策和管理决策一直在做出,对科学知识的依赖程度各不相同。资助机构为科学与政策或实践之间的知识交流提供了激励措施,但在学术机构中这仍然是例外而非惯例。向前迈出的重要一步将是建立知识中介并使其专业化(即作为现有技术转让和通信部门的补充)。这将需要资助机构和院校明确投入资源。许多学术科学家对其研究的应用确实感兴趣。通过为知识中介过程提供支持,并整合自然科学、社会科学和工程科学来解决与政策和实践广泛相关的问题,可以激发这种兴趣。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43cb/6106375/f6a6675b114f/11625_2015_314_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43cb/6106375/f6a6675b114f/11625_2015_314_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43cb/6106375/f6a6675b114f/11625_2015_314_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do we need "more research" or better implementation through knowledge brokering?我们是需要“更多研究”,还是通过知识传播来实现更好的实施?
Sustain Sci. 2016;11(2):363-369. doi: 10.1007/s11625-015-0314-8. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
2
3
A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.理解生态学和保护学中科学实践差距成因观点的概念框架。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1032-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12385. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
Knowledge that Acts: Evaluating the Outcomes of a Knowledge Brokering Intervention in Western Australia's Ningaloo Region.付诸行动的知识:评估西澳大利亚州宁格鲁地区知识中介干预的成果。
Environ Manage. 2017 Nov;60(5):896-907. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0917-1. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
5
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
6
Using knowledge brokering to promote evidence-based policy-making: The need for support structures.利用知识中介促进循证决策:对支持结构的需求。
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):608-12. doi: 10.2471/blt.05.028308.
7
8
Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.医学科学中的利益冲突:同行使用、同行评审与“利益冲突咨询”
Med Hypotheses. 2004;63(2):181-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.06.001.
9
Can knowledge exchange support the implementation of a health-promoting schools approach? Perceived outcomes of knowledge exchange in the COMPASS study.知识交流能否支持促进健康学校方法的实施?COMPASS 研究中知识交流的感知结果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 13;18(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5229-8.
10
Deconstructing knowledge brokering for commissioned rapid reviews: an observational study.解构委托式快速综述中的知识掮客行为:一项观察性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0389-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The lab-field continuum in conservation physiology research: leveraging multiple approaches to inform policy and practice.保护生理学研究中的实验室-野外连续体:利用多种方法为政策和实践提供信息。
Conserv Physiol. 2025 Sep 2;13(1):coaf063. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coaf063. eCollection 2025.
2
Social ecological system framework as a decision-making tool for risk mitigation: A superfund site case study.作为风险缓解决策工具的社会生态系统框架:一个超级基金场地案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Aug 20;939:173595. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173595. Epub 2024 May 27.
3
U.S. public opinion about the safety of gene editing in the agriculture and medical fields and the amount of evidence needed to improve opinions.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental risk assessors as honest brokers or stealth advocates.环境风险评估者是诚实的中间人还是隐秘的倡导者。
Risk Anal. 2014 Nov;34(11):1972-7. doi: 10.1111/risa.12225.
2
Engagement at the science-policy interface.科学-政策界面的互动。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 7;48(19):11031-3. doi: 10.1021/es504225t. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
3
Bridging research and environmental regulatory processes: the role of knowledge brokers.搭建研究与环境监管流程之间的桥梁:知识中介的作用。
美国公众对农业和医学领域基因编辑安全性的看法以及改善看法所需的证据量。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 16;12:1340398. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1340398. eCollection 2024.
4
Overcoming Common Anxieties in Knowledge Translation: Advice for Scholarly Issue Advocates.克服知识转化中的常见焦虑:学术问题倡导者的建议。
Milbank Q. 2024 Jun;102(2):383-397. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12694. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
5
Considerations for Research Funders and Managers to Facilitate the Translation of Scientific Knowledge into Practice.研究资助者和管理者促进科学知识转化为实践的考量因素。
Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;73(3):668-682. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01895-w. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
6
Aligning social networks and co-designed visions to foster systemic innovation in the Alps.整合社交网络与共同设计的愿景,以促进阿尔卑斯地区的系统性创新。
Reg Environ Change. 2023;23(3):102. doi: 10.1007/s10113-023-02099-y. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
7
Health risk communication and infodemic management in Iran: development and validation of a conceptual framework.伊朗的健康风险沟通和信息疫情管理:概念框架的制定和验证。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e072326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072326.
8
Is implementation research out of step with implementation practice? Pathways to effective implementation support over the last decade.实施研究是否与实施实践脱节?过去十年实现有效实施支持的途径。
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jun 6;3:26334895221105585. doi: 10.1177/26334895221105585. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians' engagement in research: a qualitative exploration.利用知识中介活动促进医疗辅助临床医生参与研究:一项定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e060456. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060456.
10
Local Spatialized Knowledge of Threats to Forest Conservation in Ghana's High Forest Zone.加纳高地森林带森林保护威胁的局部空间化知识。
Environ Manage. 2021 Nov;68(5):738-754. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01455-0. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(21):11985-92. doi: 10.1021/es4025244. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
4
The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship.人类世:从全球变化到行星守护。
Ambio. 2011 Nov;40(7):739-61. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x.
5
Knowledge Brokering: The missing link in the evidence to action chain?知识中介:证据到行动链条中缺失的环节?
Evid Policy. 2009 Aug;5(3):267-279. doi: 10.1332/174426409X463811.
6
Curiouser and curiouser: managing discovery making.越来越奇怪了:管理发现的过程。
Nature. 2010 Nov 18;468(7322):347. doi: 10.1038/468347a.
7
Challenges of linking scientific knowledge to river basin management policy: AquaTerra as a case study.将科学知识与流域管理政策相联系面临的挑战:以AquaTerra为例进行研究。
Environ Pollut. 2007 Aug;148(3):867-74. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.048. Epub 2007 May 4.
8
Can scientists and policy makers work together?科学家和政策制定者能携手合作吗?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):632-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.031765.
9
Knowledge systems for sustainable development.可持续发展的知识体系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8086-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100. Epub 2003 May 30.