• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

靶向 16S rRNA 基因测序研究中变异和生物量的量化。

Quantification of variation and the impact of biomass in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies.

机构信息

USC Keck School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.

Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90027, USA.

出版信息

Microbiome. 2018 Sep 10;6(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0543-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40168-018-0543-z
PMID:30201048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6131952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools have allowed for large-scale microbiome studies that are rapidly advancing medical research. However, small changes in technique or analysis can significantly alter the results and lead to conflicting findings. Quantifying the technical versus biological variation expected in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies and how this variation changes with input biomass is critical to guide meaningful interpretation of the current literature and plan future research.

RESULTS

Data were compiled from 469 sequencing libraries across 19 separate targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing runs over a 2.5-year time period. Following removal of contaminant sequences identified from negative controls, 244 samples retained sufficient reads for further analysis. Coefficients of variation for intra- and inter-assay variation from repeated measurements of a bacterial mock community ranged from 8.7 to 37.6% (intra) and 15.6 to 80.5% (inter) for all but one genus of bacteria whose relative abundance was greater than 1%. Intra- versus inter-assay Bray-Curtis pairwise distances for a single stool sample were 0.11 versus 0.31, whereas intra-assay variation from repeat stool samples from the same donor was greater at 0.38 (Wilcoxon p = 0.001). A dilution series of the bacterial mock community was used to assess the effect of input biomass on variability. Pairwise distances increased with more dilute samples, and estimates of relative abundance became unreliable below approximately 100 copies of the 16S rRNA gene per microliter. Using this data, we created a prediction model to estimate the expected variation in microbiome measurements for given input biomass and relative abundance values.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-controlled microbiome studies are sufficiently robust to capture small biological effects and can achieve levels of variability consistent with clinical assays. Relative abundance is negatively associated with measures of variability and has a stronger effect on variability than does absolute biomass, suggesting that it is feasible to detect differences in bacterial populations in very low-biomass samples. Further, by quantifying the effect of biomass and relative abundance on compositional variability, we developed a tool for defining the expected variance in a given microbiome study.

摘要

背景

测序技术和生物信息学工具的最新进展使得大规模微生物组研究得以快速推进医学研究。然而,技术或分析上的微小变化会显著改变结果,并导致相互矛盾的发现。量化靶向 16S rRNA 基因测序研究中预期的技术与生物学变异性,以及这种变异性如何随输入生物量而变化,对于指导当前文献的有意义解释和规划未来的研究至关重要。

结果

数据来自 19 个独立靶向 16S rRNA 基因测序运行的 469 个测序文库,时间跨度为 2.5 年。在去除阴性对照中鉴定出的污染序列后,有 244 个样本保留了足够的读数进行进一步分析。从细菌模拟群落的重复测量中得出的内和间测定变异系数范围为 8.7%至 37.6%(内)和 15.6%至 80.5%(间),除了一个相对丰度大于 1%的细菌属外。单个粪便样本的内-间 Bray-Curtis 成对距离为 0.11,而同一供体的重复粪便样本的内-间测定变异系数为 0.31(Wilcoxon p = 0.001)。细菌模拟群落的稀释系列用于评估输入生物量对变异性的影响。成对距离随稀释样品的增加而增加,并且在每个微升 16S rRNA 基因约 100 个拷贝以下,相对丰度的估计变得不可靠。使用这些数据,我们创建了一个预测模型,以估计给定输入生物量和相对丰度值下微生物组测量的预期变异性。

结论

经过良好控制的微生物组研究具有足够的稳健性,可以捕获微小的生物学效应,并达到与临床检测一致的变异性水平。相对丰度与变异性测量值呈负相关,并且对变异性的影响大于绝对生物量,这表明在非常低生物量的样本中检测细菌种群的差异是可行的。此外,通过量化生物量和相对丰度对组成变异性的影响,我们开发了一种工具,用于定义给定微生物组研究中的预期方差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/319a26f7cd1b/40168_2018_543_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/11a5466620d0/40168_2018_543_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/fdeee593c66e/40168_2018_543_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/1493746f8faf/40168_2018_543_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/319a26f7cd1b/40168_2018_543_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/11a5466620d0/40168_2018_543_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/fdeee593c66e/40168_2018_543_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/1493746f8faf/40168_2018_543_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6af1/6131952/319a26f7cd1b/40168_2018_543_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantification of variation and the impact of biomass in targeted 16S rRNA gene sequencing studies.靶向 16S rRNA 基因测序研究中变异和生物量的量化。
Microbiome. 2018 Sep 10;6(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0543-z.
2
Quantifying variation across 16S rRNA gene sequencing runs in human microbiome studies.量化人类微生物组研究中 16S rRNA 基因测序运行中的变异。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 8;108(1):367. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13198-z.
3
Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.细菌皮肤微生物群调查方法的优化:引物选择以及454平台与MiSeq平台的比较
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0927-4.
4
Optimizing 16S rRNA gene profile analysis from low biomass nasopharyngeal and induced sputum specimens.优化鼻咽和诱导痰低生物量标本 16S rRNA 基因谱分析。
BMC Microbiol. 2020 May 12;20(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01795-7.
5
Managing Contamination and Diverse Bacterial Loads in 16S rRNA Deep Sequencing of Clinical Samples: Implications of the Law of Small Numbers.管理临床样本 16S rRNA 深度测序中的污染和多样细菌负荷:小数字定律的启示。
mBio. 2021 Jun 29;12(3):e0059821. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00598-21. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.用于肠道微生物组组成分析的测序平台和生物信息学管道的比较。
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Sep 13;17(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1101-8.
7
Refinement of 16S rRNA gene analysis for low biomass biospecimens.16S rRNA 基因分析在低生物量生物样本中的优化。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90226-2.
8
Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.引物、流程、参数:16S rRNA 基因测序中的问题。
mSphere. 2021 Feb 24;6(1):e01202-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01202-20.
9
Genome-Based Targeted Sequencing as a Reproducible Microbial Community Profiling Assay.基于基因组的靶向测序作为一种可重复的微生物群落分析方法。
mSphere. 2021 Apr 7;6(2):e01325-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01325-20.
10
Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.粪便样本与直肠拭子样本以及储存条件对细菌群落谱的比较。
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-0983-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial Community Distribution in Low Permeability Reservoirs and Their Positive Impact on Enhanced Oil Recovery.低渗透油藏中微生物群落分布及其对提高原油采收率的积极影响
Microorganisms. 2025 May 27;13(6):1230. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061230.
2
Quantifying synthetic bacterial community composition with flow cytometry: efficacy in mock communities and challenges in co-cultures.用流式细胞术量化合成细菌群落组成:在模拟群落中的效果及共培养中的挑战
mSystems. 2025 Jan 21;10(1):e0100924. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01009-24. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Maternal HIV infection and the milk microbiome.

本文引用的文献

1
Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data.简单的统计鉴定和去除标记基因和宏基因组数据中的污染物序列。
Microbiome. 2018 Dec 17;6(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0605-2.
2
Denoising the Denoisers: an independent evaluation of microbiome sequence error-correction approaches.对去噪器进行去噪:微生物组序列错误校正方法的独立评估。
PeerJ. 2018 Aug 8;6:e5364. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5364. eCollection 2018.
3
KatharoSeq Enables High-Throughput Microbiome Analysis from Low-Biomass Samples.
母体 HIV 感染与母乳微生物组。
Microbiome. 2024 Sep 28;12(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s40168-024-01843-8.
4
Microbiome time series data reveal predictable patterns of change.微生物组时间序列数据揭示了可预测的变化模式。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 3;12(10):e0410923. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04109-23. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
5
Quantifying variation across 16S rRNA gene sequencing runs in human microbiome studies.量化人类微生物组研究中 16S rRNA 基因测序运行中的变异。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 8;108(1):367. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13198-z.
6
Fast quantification of gut bacterial species in cocultures using flow cytometry and supervised classification.使用流式细胞术和监督分类法对共培养物中的肠道细菌种类进行快速定量分析。
ISME Commun. 2022 Apr 25;2(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00123-6.
7
Changes in the Vaginal Microbiome During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in South African Women: a Longitudinal Study.南非女性在孕期及产后的阴道微生物组变化:一项纵向研究。
Reprod Sci. 2024 Jan;31(1):275-287. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01351-4. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
8
Changes in the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy and the postpartum period in South African women: a longitudinal study.南非女性孕期及产后阴道微生物群的变化:一项纵向研究。
Res Sq. 2023 Apr 19:rs.3.rs-2617869. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2617869/v1.
9
Non-human primate models for understanding the impact of the microbiome on pregnancy and the female reproductive tract†.用于了解微生物组对妊娠和女性生殖道影响的非人类灵长类动物模型†。
Biol Reprod. 2023 Jul 11;109(1):1-16. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioad042.
10
Best practice for wildlife gut microbiome research: A comprehensive review of methodology for 16S rRNA gene investigations.野生动物肠道微生物组研究的最佳实践:16S rRNA基因调查方法的全面综述
Front Microbiol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1092216. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1092216. eCollection 2023.
KatharoSeq技术可实现对低生物量样本的高通量微生物组分析。
mSystems. 2018 Mar 13;3(3). doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00218-17. eCollection 2018 May-Jun.
4
The Madness of Microbiome: Attempting To Find Consensus "Best Practice" for 16S Microbiome Studies.微生物组的疯狂:试图为 16S 微生物组研究找到共识的“最佳实践”。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Mar 19;84(7). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02627-17. Print 2018 Apr 1.
5
Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research.优化微生物组研究方法和避免陷阱。
Microbiome. 2017 May 5;5(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5.
6
A critical assessment of the "sterile womb" and "in utero colonization" hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome.对“无菌子宫”和“宫内定植”假说的批判性评估:对先锋婴儿微生物组研究的启示。
Microbiome. 2017 Apr 28;5(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0268-4.
7
The Microbiome and Human Biology.微生物组与人类生物学。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2017 Aug 31;18:65-86. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022438. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
8
Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics.归一化和微生物差异丰度策略取决于数据特征。
Microbiome. 2017 Mar 3;5(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y.
9
Large-scale benchmarking reveals false discoveries and count transformation sensitivity in 16S rRNA gene amplicon data analysis methods used in microbiome studies.大规模基准测试揭示了微生物组研究中使用的 16S rRNA 基因扩增子数据分析方法中的假发现和计数转换敏感性。
Microbiome. 2016 Nov 25;4(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0208-8.
10
The effect of host genetics on the gut microbiome.宿主遗传学对肠道微生物组的影响。
Nat Genet. 2016 Nov;48(11):1407-1412. doi: 10.1038/ng.3663. Epub 2016 Oct 3.