Suppr超能文献

实时诊断 Barrett 食管:一项新使用者中比较共聚焦激光内镜与常规组织学用于肠化生识别的前瞻性、多中心研究。

Real-time diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus: a prospective, multicenter study comparing confocal laser endomicroscopy with conventional histology for the identification of intestinal metaplasia in new users.

机构信息

Northwest Institute for Digestive Surgery, 750 N Syringa St, Ste 205, Post Falls, ID, 83854, USA.

Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1585-1591. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6420-9. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic evaluation with high-definition white light endoscopy and random 4-quadrant biopsy (Seattle Protocol) is the current standard of care for the detection of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Recently, enhanced imaging technologies have become available to provide real-time diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and dysplasia, reducing the need for tissue biopsy. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) provides dynamic microscopic mucosal views, rapidly capturing digital images that become optical biopsies. This study examined the role of pCLE in BE screening and surveillance as compared to the Seattle Protocol.

METHODS

Patients undergoing BE screening or surveillance endoscopy were enrolled at eight US centers. Optical biopsy using pCLE was interpreted in real time. Endoscopists performing pCLE were new users with a median experience of 8.5 months and no formal training in surgical pathology. Seattle Protocol biopsies were then taken. Recorded pCLE images were reviewed by a blinded expert in optical biopsy interpretation.

RESULTS

Early pCLE users identified significantly more patients with IM than the Seattle Protocol overall (99/172 vs. 46/172, p < 0.0001). Early users of pCLE also identified significantly more patients with IM than the Seattle Protocol in the patients with visible columnar lined esophagus (75 vs. 31, p < 0.0001), but not in the 76 patients without columnar lined esophagus (24 vs. 15, p = 0.067). There was no statistically significant difference between early pCLE users and expert review.

CONCLUSION

Optical biopsy using pCLE technology allows for the real-time evaluation of entire segments of columnar lined esophagus. Consequently, pCLE is considerably more sensitive in the detection of BE than the Seattle Protocol, which leaves a majority of epithelium unexamined. This effect is seen even in new users and increases with experience. Overall, pCLE provides a promising advance in Barrett's detection which will likely result in superior identification of individuals at risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

摘要

简介

使用高清白光内镜和随机 4 象限活检(西雅图协议)进行内镜评估是目前 Barrett 食管(BE)检测的标准护理。最近,增强成像技术已经可以提供对肠化生(IM)和异型增生的实时诊断,减少了对组织活检的需求。基于探头的共聚焦激光内镜检查(pCLE)提供了动态微观黏膜视图,可快速捕获成为光学活检的数字图像。这项研究比较了 pCLE 在 BE 筛查和监测中的作用与西雅图协议。

方法

在八个美国中心招募接受 BE 筛查或监测内镜检查的患者。实时解释光学活检用 pCLE。进行 pCLE 的内镜医生是新用户,平均经验为 8.5 个月,没有手术病理学的正式培训。然后采集西雅图协议活检。记录的 pCLE 图像由光学活检解释的盲法专家进行审查。

结果

早期 pCLE 用户总体上比西雅图协议识别出更多的 IM 患者(99/172 与 46/172,p<0.0001)。早期 pCLE 用户在有可见柱状上皮食管的患者中也比西雅图协议识别出更多的 IM 患者(75 与 31,p<0.0001),但在 76 名无柱状上皮食管的患者中没有差异(24 与 15,p=0.067)。早期 pCLE 用户与专家审查之间没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

使用 pCLE 技术的光学活检允许对整个柱状上皮食管段进行实时评估。因此,pCLE 在检测 BE 方面比西雅图协议灵敏得多,后者未检查大部分上皮。这种影响甚至在新用户中也可以看到,并且随着经验的增加而增加。总的来说,pCLE 在 Barrett 的检测方面提供了一个有前途的进展,这将很可能导致更好地识别患食管腺癌风险的个体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验