Suppr超能文献

用于立体定向放射外科手术的锥形探测器评估。

Detectors assessment for stereotactic radiosurgery with cones.

作者信息

Garnier Nicolas, Amblard Régis, Villeneuve Rémy, Haykal Rodolphe, Ortholan Cécile, Colin Philippe, Gérard Anaïs, Belhomme Sarah, Mady Franck, Benabdesselam Mourad, Serrano Benjamin

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Princess Grace Hospital Center, Monaco, Monaco.

Institut de Physique de Nice, Côte d'Azur University, Parc Valrose, Nice, France.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):88-98. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12449. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to assess eight detectors performance for output factor (OF), percent depth dose (PDD), and beam profiles in a 6-MV Clinac stereotactic radiosurgery mode for cone irradiation using Monte Carlo simulation as reference. Cones with diameters comprised between 30 and 4 mm have been studied. The evaluated detectors were ionization chambers: pinpoint and pinpoint 3D, diodes: SRS, P and E, Edge, MicroDiamond and EBT3 radiochromic films. The results showed that pinpoints underestimate OF up to -2.3% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and down to -12% for smaller cones. Both nonshielded (SRS and E) and shielded diodes (P and Edge) overestimate the OF respectively up to 3.3% and 5.2% for cone diameters ≥10 mm and in both cases more than 7% for smaller cones. MicroDiamond slightly overestimates the OF, 3.7% for all the cones and EBT3 film is the closest to Monte Carlo with maximum difference of ±1% whatever the cone size is. For the profiles and the PDD, particularly for the small cones, the size of the detector predominates. All diodes and EBT3 agree with the simulation within ±0.2 mm for beam profiles determination. For PDD curve all the active detectors response agree with simulation up to 1% for all the cones. EBT3 is the more accurate detector for beam profiles and OF determinations of stereotactic cones but it is restrictive to use. Due to respectively inappropriate size of the sensitive volume and composition, pinpoints and diodes do not seem appropriate without OF corrective factors below 10 mm diameter cone. MicroDiamond appears to be the best detector for OF determination regardless all cones. For off-axis measurements, the size of the detector predominates and for PDD all detectors give promising results.

摘要

本研究旨在以蒙特卡罗模拟为参考,评估在6兆伏直线加速器立体定向放射外科模式下进行锥形照射时,八种探测器在输出因子(OF)、百分深度剂量(PDD)和射野轮廓方面的性能。研究了直径在30至4毫米之间的锥形准直器。评估的探测器包括电离室:针点电离室和针点3D电离室,二极管:SRS、P和E二极管、Edge二极管、微型金刚石探测器以及EBT3放射变色胶片。结果表明,对于直径≥10毫米的锥形准直器,针点电离室低估OF高达-2.3%,对于较小的锥形准直器则低至-12%。对于直径≥10毫米的锥形准直器,无屏蔽二极管(SRS和E二极管)和屏蔽二极管(P二极管和Edge二极管)分别高估OF高达3.3%和5.2%,对于较小的锥形准直器,两种情况下高估均超过7%。微型金刚石探测器略微高估OF,所有锥形准直器的高估幅度为3.7%,而EBT3胶片与蒙特卡罗模拟最为接近,无论锥形准直器尺寸如何,最大差异为±1%。对于射野轮廓和PDD,特别是对于小锥形准直器,探测器的尺寸起主导作用。对于射野轮廓的测定,所有二极管和EBT3胶片与模拟结果的偏差在±0.2毫米以内。对于PDD曲线,所有有源探测器的响应与模拟结果在所有锥形准直器上的偏差均在1%以内。EBT3是用于立体定向锥形准直器的射野轮廓和OF测定的最准确探测器,但使用起来有局限性。由于敏感体积和组成尺寸分别不合适,对于直径小于10毫米的锥形准直器,在没有OF校正因子的情况下,针点电离室和二极管似乎不合适。无论所有锥形准直器如何,微型金刚石探测器似乎是OF测定的最佳探测器。对于离轴测量,探测器的尺寸起主导作用,对于PDD,所有探测器都给出了有希望的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d2d/6236831/e55505bf3406/ACM2-19-88-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验