Maleiner Babette, Tomasch Janine, Heher Philipp, Spadiut Oliver, Rünzler Dominik, Fuchs Christiane
Department of Biochemical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, Vienna, Austria.
The Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.
Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 22;9:1130. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01130. eCollection 2018.
Classical approaches to engineer skeletal muscle tissue based on current regenerative and surgical procedures still do not meet the desired outcome for patient applications. Besides the evident need to create functional skeletal muscle tissue for the repair of volumetric muscle defects, there is also growing demand for platforms to study muscle-related diseases, such as muscular dystrophies or sarcopenia. Currently, numerous studies exist that have employed a variety of biomaterials, cell types and strategies for maturation of skeletal muscle tissue in 2D and 3D environments. However, researchers are just at the beginning of understanding the impact of different culture settings and their biochemical (growth factors and chemical changes) and biophysical cues (mechanical properties) on myogenesis. With this review we intend to emphasize the need for new skeletal muscle (disease) models to better recapitulate important structural and functional aspects of muscle development. We highlight the importance of choosing appropriate system components, e.g., cell and biomaterial type, structural and mechanical matrix properties or culture format, and how understanding their interplay will enable researchers to create optimized platforms to investigate myogenesis in healthy and diseased tissue. Thus, we aim to deliver guidelines for experimental designs to allow estimation of the potential influence of the selected skeletal muscle tissue engineering setup on the myogenic outcome prior to their implementation. Moreover, we offer a workflow to facilitate identifying and selecting different analytical tools to demonstrate the successful creation of functional skeletal muscle tissue. Ultimately, a refinement of existing strategies will lead to further progression in understanding important aspects of muscle diseases, muscle aging and muscle regeneration to improve quality of life of patients and enable the establishment of new treatment options.
基于当前再生和外科手术程序来构建骨骼肌组织的传统方法,仍无法满足患者应用中所期望的结果。除了明显需要创建功能性骨骼肌组织来修复大面积肌肉缺损外,对于研究肌肉相关疾病(如肌肉萎缩症或肌肉减少症)的平台需求也在不断增加。目前,已有大量研究采用了各种生物材料、细胞类型和策略,在二维和三维环境中促进骨骼肌组织的成熟。然而,研究人员才刚刚开始了解不同培养环境及其生化因素(生长因子和化学变化)和生物物理线索(机械性能)对肌生成的影响。通过本综述,我们旨在强调需要新的骨骼肌(疾病)模型,以更好地重现肌肉发育的重要结构和功能方面。我们强调选择合适的系统组件(如细胞和生物材料类型、结构和机械基质特性或培养形式)的重要性,以及了解它们之间的相互作用将如何使研究人员创建优化的平台,来研究健康和患病组织中的肌生成。因此,我们旨在提供实验设计指南,以便在实施之前评估所选骨骼肌组织工程设置对肌生成结果的潜在影响。此外,我们提供了一个工作流程,以促进识别和选择不同的分析工具,来证明功能性骨骼肌组织的成功构建。最终,对现有策略的完善将有助于在理解肌肉疾病、肌肉衰老和肌肉再生的重要方面取得进一步进展,从而改善患者的生活质量,并建立新的治疗方案。