Suppr超能文献

智能环境中老年人对机器人服务的接受度:用户满意度与可接受性研究。

Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study.

作者信息

Cavallo Filippo, Esposito Raffaele, Limosani Raffaele, Manzi Alessandro, Bevilacqua Roberta, Felici Elisa, Di Nuovo Alessandro, Cangelosi Angelo, Lattanzio Fabrizia, Dario Paolo

机构信息

Assistive Robotics Lab, The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pontedera, Italy.

Laboratorio di Bioinformatica, Bioingegenria e Domotica, Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 21;20(9):e264. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9460.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Europe, the population of older people is increasing rapidly. Many older people prefer to remain in their homes but living alone could be a risk for their safety. In this context, robotics and other emerging technologies are increasingly proposed as potential solutions to this societal concern. However, one-third of all assistive technologies are abandoned within one year of use because the end users do not accept them.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the acceptance of the Robot-Era system, which provides robotic services to permit older people to remain in their homes.

METHODS

Six robotic services were tested by 35 older users. The experiments were conducted in three different environments: private home, condominium, and outdoor sites. The appearance questionnaire was developed to collect the users' first impressions about the Robot-Era system, whereas the acceptance was evaluated through a questionnaire developed ad hoc for Robot-Era.

RESULTS

A total of 45 older users were recruited. The people were grouped in two samples of 35 participants, according to their availability. Participants had a positive impression of Robot-Era robots, as reflected by the mean score of 73.04 (SD 11.80) for DORO's (domestic robot) appearance, 76.85 (SD 12.01) for CORO (condominium robot), and 75.93 (SD 11.67) for ORO (outdoor robot). Men gave ORO's appearance an overall score higher than women (P=.02). Moreover, participants younger than 75 years understood more readily the functionalities of Robot-Era robots compared to older people (P=.007 for DORO, P=.001 for CORO, and P=.046 for ORO). For the ad hoc questionnaire, the mean overall score was higher than 80 out of 100 points for all Robot-Era services. Older persons with a high educational level gave Robot-Era services a higher score than those with a low level of education (shopping: P=.04; garbage: P=.047; reminding: P=.04; indoor walking support: P=.006; outdoor walking support: P=.03). A higher score was given by male older adults for shopping (P=.02), indoor walking support (P=.02), and outdoor walking support (P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the feedback given by the end users, the Robot-Era system has the potential to be developed as a socially acceptable and believable provider of robotic services to facilitate older people to live independently in their homes.

摘要

背景

在欧洲,老年人口正在迅速增加。许多老年人更喜欢居家养老,但独自生活可能会对他们的安全构成风险。在这种背景下,机器人技术和其他新兴技术越来越多地被视为解决这一社会问题的潜在方案。然而,所有辅助技术中有三分之一在使用一年内就被弃用,原因是终端用户不接受它们。

目的

本研究旨在调查Robot-Era系统的接受度,该系统提供机器人服务以使老年人能够居家养老。

方法

35名老年用户对六项机器人服务进行了测试。实验在三种不同环境中进行:私人住宅、公寓和户外场所。设计了外观问卷来收集用户对Robot-Era系统的第一印象,而接受度则通过专门为Robot-Era设计的问卷进行评估。

结果

共招募了45名老年用户。根据他们的可用性,将这些人分为两个35名参与者的样本。参与者对Robot-Era机器人有积极印象,DORO(家用机器人)外观的平均得分为73.04(标准差11.80),CORO(公寓机器人)为76.85(标准差12.01),ORO(户外机器人)为75.93(标准差11.67)。男性对ORO外观的总体评分高于女性(P = 0.02)。此外,与老年人相比,75岁以下的参与者更容易理解Robot-Era机器人的功能(DORO的P = 0.007,CORO的P = 0.001,ORO的P = 0.046)。对于专门设计的问卷,所有Robot-Era服务的平均总分高于100分中的80分。教育水平高的老年人对Robot-Era服务的评分高于教育水平低的老年人(购物:P = 0.04;垃圾处理:P = 0.047;提醒:P = 0.04;室内步行辅助:P = 0.006;户外步行辅助:P = 0.03)。男性老年人对购物(P = 0.02)、室内步行辅助(P = 0.02)和户外步行辅助(P = 0.03)的评分更高。

结论

根据终端用户给出的反馈,Robot-Era系统有潜力被开发成为一个社会可接受且可信的机器人服务提供商,以帮助老年人在家中独立生活。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a8f/6231879/92615df72e77/jmir_v20i9e264_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验