Marijn Stok F, Renner Britta, Allan Julia, Boeing Heiner, Ensenauer Regina, Issanchou Sylvie, Kiesswetter Eva, Lien Nanna, Mazzocchi Mario, Monsivais Pablo, Stelmach-Mardas Marta, Volkert Dorothee, Hoffmann Stefan
Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Health Psychology, The Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 20;9:1689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01689. eCollection 2018.
Dietary behavior encompasses many aspects, terms for which are used inconsistently across different disciplines and research traditions. This hampers communication and comparison across disciplines and impedes the development of a cumulative science. We describe the conceptual analysis of the fuzzy umbrella concept "dietary behavior" and present the development of an interdisciplinary taxonomy of dietary behavior. A four-phase multi-method approach was employed. Input was provided by 76 scholars involved in an international research project focusing on the determinants of dietary behavior. Input was collected from the scholars via an online mind mapping procedure. After structuring, condensing, and categorizing this input into a compact taxonomy, the result was presented to all scholars, discussed extensively, and adapted. A second revision round was then conducted among a core working group. A total of 145 distinct entries were made in the original mind mapping procedure. The subsequent steps allowed us to reduce and condense the taxonomy into a final product consisting of 34 terms organized into three main categories: Food Choice, Eating Behavior, and Dietary Intake/Nutrition. In a live discussion session attended by 50 of the scholars involved in the development of the taxonomy, it was judged to adequately reflect their input and to be a valid and useful starting point for interdisciplinary understanding and collaboration. The current taxonomy can be used as a tool to facilitate understanding and cooperation between different disciplines investigating dietary behavior, which may contribute to a more successful approach to tackling the complex public health challenges faced by the field. The taxonomy need not be viewed as a final product, but can continue to grow in depth and width as additional experts provide their input.
饮食行为包含许多方面,不同学科和研究传统对这些方面的术语使用并不一致。这妨碍了跨学科的交流与比较,阻碍了累积性科学的发展。我们描述了模糊的总括概念“饮食行为”的概念分析,并展示了饮食行为跨学科分类法的发展。采用了一种分四个阶段的多方法途径。参与一项关注饮食行为决定因素的国际研究项目的76位学者提供了相关信息。通过在线思维导图程序从这些学者那里收集信息。在对这些信息进行整理、浓缩并归类为一个紧凑的分类法后,将结果呈现给所有学者,进行了广泛讨论并加以调整。然后在一个核心工作组中进行了第二轮修订。在最初的思维导图程序中总共列出了145个不同的条目。随后的步骤使我们能够将分类法简化和浓缩为一个最终成果,该成果由34个术语组成,分为三个主要类别:食物选择、饮食行为和饮食摄入/营养。在一次由50位参与分类法制定的学者参加的现场讨论会上,该分类法被认为充分反映了他们的意见,是跨学科理解与合作的一个有效且有用的起点。当前的分类法可作为一种工具,促进不同学科之间对饮食行为的理解与合作,这可能有助于以更成功的方式应对该领域面临的复杂公共卫生挑战。该分类法不必被视为最终成果,而是可以随着更多专家提供意见而在深度和广度上不断发展。