Leech Rebecca M, Worsley Anthony, Timperio Anna, McNaughton Sarah A
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (C-PAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (C-PAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Nov;102(5):1229-37. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.114660. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
To date, many approaches have been used to define eating occasions (EOs). A standard definition for EOs is required to facilitate further research.
In this study, we examined the influence of differing definitions of EOs on the characterization of eating patterns.
Cross-sectional dietary data from two 24-h recalls collected during the 2011-12 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 5242 adults, aged ≥19 y) were analyzed. Eight definitions were applied: participant-identified, time-of-day, and 6 neutral definitions (individual EOs separated by different time intervals and/or an additional energy criterion of 210 kJ). Frequency of and total energy intake from meals, snacks, and all EOs were estimated, as appropriate. Differences were tested by using F tests, stratified by sex and age group. Agreement between different definitions of meal and snack frequencies was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). For each definition, linear regression was used to estimate the proportion of variance in total energy intake (kJ) and amount of food intake (g) predicted by frequency of EOs and meals and snacks.
Among both sexes and across all age groups, mean frequencies of meals differed between the participant-identified and time-of-day definitions (mean difference range = 0.1-0.3; P < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences between mean frequencies of EOs across the 6 neutral definitions (P < 0.001). There was good agreement for snacks (men: ICC = 0.89; women: ICC = 0.87) but not meal frequencies (men: ICC = 0.38; women: ICC = 0.36) between the participant-identified and time-of-day definitions. The neutral definition (15-min time interval plus energy criterion) best predicted variance in total energy intake (R(2) range = 19.3-27.8).
Different approaches to the definition of EOs affect how eating patterns are characterized, with the neutral definition best predicting variance in total energy intake. Further research that examines how different EO definitions affect associations with health outcomes is needed to develop consensus on a standard EO definition.
迄今为止,已有多种方法用于定义进食时机(EOs)。需要一个EOs的标准定义以促进进一步研究。
在本研究中,我们考察了不同的EOs定义对饮食模式特征描述的影响。
分析了2011 - 12年澳大利亚全国营养与身体活动调查期间收集的两次24小时膳食回顾的横断面膳食数据(n = 5242名成年人,年龄≥19岁)。应用了八种定义:参与者自行确定的、按一天中的时间划分的,以及六种中性定义(各个EOs由不同的时间间隔和/或额外的210千焦能量标准分隔)。酌情估计了餐食、零食以及所有EOs的进食频率和总能量摄入。差异通过F检验进行检验,并按性别和年龄组分层分析。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估餐食和零食频率的不同定义之间的一致性。对于每种定义,使用线性回归来估计由EOs以及餐食和零食的频率所预测的总能量摄入(千焦)和食物摄入量(克)的方差比例。
在所有性别和年龄组中,参与者自行确定的定义和按一天中的时间划分的定义之间餐食的平均频率存在差异(平均差异范围 = 0.1 - 0.3;P < 0.001)。六种中性定义之间EOs的平均频率存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001)。在参与者自行确定的定义和按一天中的时间划分的定义之间,零食频率的一致性良好(男性:ICC = 0.89;女性:ICC = 0.87),但餐食频率的一致性不佳(男性:ICC = 0.38;女性:ICC = 0.36)。中性定义(15分钟时间间隔加能量标准)最能预测总能量摄入的方差(R²范围 = 19.3 - 27.8)。
定义EOs的不同方法会影响饮食模式的特征描述方式,其中中性定义最能预测总能量摄入的方差。需要进一步研究不同的EO定义如何影响与健康结果的关联,以就标准的EO定义达成共识。