Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Institute of Cognititive Neuroscience, UCL, 17 Queen Square, London, UK.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018 Oct 15;18(12):90. doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0891-x.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We now know that speech and language therapy (SALT) is effective in the rehabilitation of aphasia; however, there remains much individual variability in the response to interventions. So, what works for whom, when and how? RECENT FINDINGS: This review evaluates the current evidence for the efficacy of predominantly impairment-focused aphasia interventions with respect to optimal dose, intensity, timing and distribution or spacing of treatment. We conclude that sufficient dose of treatment is required to enable clinical gains and that e-therapies are a promising and practical way to achieve this goal. In addition, aphasia can be associated with other cognitive deficits and may lead to secondary effects such as low mood and social isolation. In order to personalise individual treatments to optimise recovery, we need to develop a greater understanding of the interactions between these factors.
目的综述:我们现在知道言语和语言治疗(SALT)对失语症康复是有效的;然而,干预措施的反应仍然存在很大的个体差异。那么,什么对谁有效,何时有效,如何有效?
最近的发现:本综述评估了目前主要以损害为重点的失语症干预措施的疗效证据,包括最佳剂量、强度、时间以及治疗的分布或间隔。我们的结论是,需要足够的治疗剂量才能使患者获得临床收益,而电子治疗是实现这一目标的一种有前途且实用的方法。此外,失语症可能与其他认知缺陷相关,并可能导致情绪低落和社会孤立等继发性影响。为了将个体治疗个性化以优化康复,我们需要更好地理解这些因素之间的相互作用。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018-10-15
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019-2-13
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2020
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024-11-4
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024-5-28
Brain Sci. 2024-4-16
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018-12
Ann Neurol. 2018-3-10
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017-12-22
Front Neurosci. 2017-7-28
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017-7