• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国规则下的重症监护病房非再入院决策:一项全国性实践调查。

Non-readmission decisions in the intensive care unit under French rules: A nationwide survey of practices.

机构信息

Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier de Dieppe, Dieppe, France.

Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Université de Bourgogne Franche Comté, CHU de Dijon, Dijon, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205689. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0205689
PMID:30335804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6193659/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigated, using a multicentre survey of practices in France, the practices of ICU physicians concerning the decision not to readmit to the ICU, in light of current legislation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multicentre survey of practices among French ICU physicians via electronic questionnaire in January 2016. Questions related to respondents' practices regarding re-admission of patients to the ICU and how these decisions were made. Criteria were evaluated by the health care professionals as regards importance for non-readmission.

RESULTS

In total, 167 physicians agreed to participate, of whom 165 (99%) actually returned a completed questionnaire from 58 ICUs. Forty-five percent were aged <35 years, 74% were full-time physicians. The findings show that decisions for non-readmission are taken at the end of the patient's stay (87%), using a collegial decision-making procedure (89% of cases); 93% reported that this decision was noted in the patient's medical file. While 73% indicated that the family/relatives were informed of non-readmission decisions, only 29% reported informing the patient, and 91% considered that non-readmission decisions are an integral part of the French legislative framework.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that decisions not to re-admit a patient to the ICU need to be formally materialized, and anticipated by involving the patient and family in the discussions, as well as the other healthcare providers that usually care for the patient. The optimal time to undertake these conversations is likely best decided on a case-by-case basis according to each patient's individual characteristics.

摘要

目的

我们通过对法国多家重症监护中心(ICU)的实践进行多中心调查,根据现行立法,调查 ICU 医生在决定不再将患者收入 ICU 时的实践情况。

材料和方法

2016 年 1 月,通过电子问卷对法国 ICU 医生进行多中心实践调查。问题涉及到患者重新收入 ICU 的决定以及这些决定是如何做出的。医务人员对非再入院的重要性进行了评估。

结果

共有 167 名医生同意参与,其中 58 个 ICU 的 165 名(99%)实际返回了完整的问卷。45%的人年龄<35 岁,74%是全职医生。研究结果表明,非再入院的决定是在患者住院结束时做出的(87%),采用集体决策程序(89%的情况下);93%的人报告说,这一决定记录在患者的病历中。虽然 73%的人表示已经将非再入院的决定告知了家属/亲属,但只有 29%的人报告告知了患者,91%的人认为非再入院的决定是法国立法框架的一个组成部分。

结论

这项研究表明,需要正式确定不再将患者收入 ICU 的决定,并通过让患者和家属参与讨论,以及其他通常照顾患者的医疗保健提供者,提前做出这一决定。根据每个患者的个体特征,可能需要根据具体情况来决定进行这些对话的最佳时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa2/6193659/75912b9cca40/pone.0205689.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa2/6193659/75912b9cca40/pone.0205689.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fa2/6193659/75912b9cca40/pone.0205689.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-readmission decisions in the intensive care unit under French rules: A nationwide survey of practices.法国规则下的重症监护病房非再入院决策:一项全国性实践调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205689. eCollection 2018.
2
Non-readmission decisions in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study of physicians' experience in a multicentre French study.重症监护病房的非再入院决策:一项多中心法国研究中医生经验的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0244919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244919. eCollection 2021.
3
[Inadequate involvement of general practitioners in end-of-life's decisions in an intensive care unit].[全科医生在重症监护病房临终决策中参与不足]
Presse Med. 2014 Nov;43(11):e377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.02.033. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
4
Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire.西欧重症监护病房中放弃生命支持:一份伦理调查问卷的结果
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1626-33. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00042.
5
How patient families are provided with information during intensive care: A survey of practices.重症监护期间如何向患者家属提供信息:实践调查。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016 Jun;35(3):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Primary Care Physician Involvement in Shared Decision Making for Critically Ill Patients and Family Satisfaction with Care.初级保健医生参与危重症患者的共同决策和家庭对护理的满意度。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;31(1):64-72. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170211.
7
A nationwide survey of intensive care unit discharge practices.一项关于重症监护病房出院实践的全国性调查。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Dec;31(12):1676-82. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2831-x. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
8
Professional Responsibility, Consensus, and Conflict: A Survey of Physician Decisions for the Chronically Critically Ill in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Units.专业责任、共识与冲突:新生儿及儿科重症监护病房中对慢性危重症患儿治疗决策的医师调查
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;18(9):e415-e422. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001247.
9
Variation in intensive care unit practices in two community hospitals.两家社区医院重症监护病房的实践差异。
Med Care. 1991 Dec;29(12):1237-45. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199112000-00006.
10
End-of-life decisions in Hungarian intensive care units.匈牙利重症监护病房中的临终决策。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Jan;39(1):116-21. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900119.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-beneficial admission to the intensive care unit: A nationwide survey of practices.非有益性 ICU 收治:一项全国范围内的实践调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0279939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279939. eCollection 2023.
2
Non-readmission decisions in the intensive care unit: A qualitative study of physicians' experience in a multicentre French study.重症监护病房的非再入院决策:一项多中心法国研究中医生经验的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0244919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244919. eCollection 2021.
3
What are the characteristics that lead physicians to perceive an ICU stay as non-beneficial for the patient?

本文引用的文献

1
What are the ethical dimensions in the profession of intensive care specialist?重症监护专科医生职业中的伦理维度有哪些?
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S47. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.34.
2
What are the ethical questions raised by the integration of intensive care into advance care planning?将重症监护纳入预先护理计划会引发哪些伦理问题?
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S46. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.08.08.
3
What are the ethical aspects surrounding the collegial decisional process in limiting and withdrawing treatment in intensive care?
哪些特征会导致医生认为患者在 ICU 的住院治疗无益?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0222039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222039. eCollection 2019.
在重症监护中限制和停止治疗的合议决策过程中,涉及哪些伦理方面的问题?
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S43. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.15.
4
What are the ethical aspects surrounding intensive care unit admission in patients with cancer?癌症患者入住重症监护病房涉及哪些伦理方面的问题?
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S42. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.12.01.
5
What are the ethical issues in relation to the role of the family in intensive care?在重症监护中,家庭角色所涉及的伦理问题有哪些?
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S40. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.44.
6
Ethical aspects of admission or non-admission to the intensive care unit.重症监护病房收治或不收治的伦理问题。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Dec;5(Suppl 4):S38. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.53.
7
Intensive care unit strain should not rush physicians into making inappropriate decisions, but merely reduce the time to the right decisions being made.重症监护病房的压力不应促使医生匆忙做出不恰当的决定,而应仅仅减少做出正确决定的时间。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Aug;4(16):316. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.07.27.
8
The Intensive care unit specialist: Report from the Task Force of World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine.重症监护病房专家:来自重症与危重症医学学会世界联合会特别工作组的报告。
J Crit Care. 2016 Oct;35:223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Report from the Task Force of World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine.重症监护病房的临终关怀:国际重症与危重症医学学会联合会特别工作组报告
J Crit Care. 2016 Aug;34:125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.04.017.
10
How patient families are provided with information during intensive care: A survey of practices.重症监护期间如何向患者家属提供信息:实践调查。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016 Jun;35(3):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 19.