Suppr超能文献

应对贸易中可过滤生物污染风险的经济激励措施。

Economic Incentives for Managing Filterable Biological Pollution Risks from Trade.

作者信息

Reeling Carson, Horan Richard D

机构信息

Department of Economics and Institute for the Environment and Sustainability, Western Michigan University, 1903 W. Michigan Ave., Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5330 USA.

Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan USA.

出版信息

Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2018 Jul;70(3):651-671. doi: 10.1007/s10640-017-0160-5. Epub 2017 May 17.

Abstract

Infectious livestock disease problems are "biological pollution" problems. Prior work on biological pollution problems generally examines the efficient allocation of prevention and control efforts, but does not identify the specific externalities underpinning the design of efficiency-enhancing policy instruments. Prior analyses also focus on problems where those being damaged do not contribute to externalities. We examine a problem where the initial biological introduction harms the importer and then others are harmed by spread from this importer. Here, the externality is the spread of infection beyond the initial importer. This externality is influenced by the importer's private risk management choices, which provide impure public goods that reduce disease spillovers to others-making disease spread a "filterable externality." We derive efficient policy incentives to internalize filterable disease externalities given uncertainties about introduction and spread. We find efficiency requires incentivizing an importer's trade choices along with self-protection and abatement efforts, in contrast to prior work that targets trade alone. Perhaps surprisingly, we find these incentives increase with importers' private risk management incentives and with their ability to directly protect others. In cases where importers can spread infection to each other, we find filterable externalities may lead to multiple Nash equilibria.

摘要

传染性家畜疾病问题属于“生物污染”问题。先前关于生物污染问题的研究通常考察预防和控制措施的有效配置,但未识别出提高效率的政策工具设计背后的具体外部性。先前的分析还聚焦于受损方不产生外部性的问题。我们研究的问题是,最初的生物引入对进口商造成损害,随后其他人又因来自该进口商的传播而受到损害。在此,外部性是感染传播至最初的进口商之外。这种外部性受进口商的私人风险管理选择影响,这些选择提供了不纯的公共物品,减少了疾病向他人的溢出——使疾病传播成为一种“可过滤的外部性”。鉴于引入和传播存在不确定性,我们推导出有效的政策激励措施,以使可过滤的疾病外部性内部化。我们发现,与之前仅针对贸易的研究不同,效率要求激励进口商的贸易选择以及自我保护和减排努力。或许令人惊讶的是,我们发现这些激励措施会随着进口商的私人风险管理激励以及他们直接保护他人的能力而增加。在进口商可能相互传播感染的情况下,我们发现可过滤的外部性可能导致多个纳什均衡。

相似文献

1
Economic Incentives for Managing Filterable Biological Pollution Risks from Trade.应对贸易中可过滤生物污染风险的经济激励措施。
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2018 Jul;70(3):651-671. doi: 10.1007/s10640-017-0160-5. Epub 2017 May 17.
5
Managing dynamic epidemiological risks through trade.通过贸易管理动态流行病学风险。
J Econ Dyn Control. 2015 Apr 1;53:192-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.02.005.
6
COVID-19 and a Green Recovery?新冠疫情与绿色复苏?
Econ Model. 2021 Nov;104:105639. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105639. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
10
Externality and COVID-19.外部性与新冠疫情。
South Econ J. 2021 Apr;87(4):1107-1118. doi: 10.1002/soej.12497. Epub 2021 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Current drivers and future directions of global livestock disease dynamics.全球家畜疾病动态的当前驱动因素和未来方向。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20871-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012953108. Epub 2011 May 16.
5
Managing ecological thresholds in coupled environmental-human systems.管理耦合环境-人类系统中的生态阈值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7333-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005431108. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验