Reeling Carson, Horan Richard D
Department of Economics and Institute for the Environment and Sustainability, Western Michigan University, 1903 W. Michigan Ave., Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5330 USA.
Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan USA.
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2018 Jul;70(3):651-671. doi: 10.1007/s10640-017-0160-5. Epub 2017 May 17.
Infectious livestock disease problems are "biological pollution" problems. Prior work on biological pollution problems generally examines the efficient allocation of prevention and control efforts, but does not identify the specific externalities underpinning the design of efficiency-enhancing policy instruments. Prior analyses also focus on problems where those being damaged do not contribute to externalities. We examine a problem where the initial biological introduction harms the importer and then others are harmed by spread from this importer. Here, the externality is the spread of infection beyond the initial importer. This externality is influenced by the importer's private risk management choices, which provide impure public goods that reduce disease spillovers to others-making disease spread a "filterable externality." We derive efficient policy incentives to internalize filterable disease externalities given uncertainties about introduction and spread. We find efficiency requires incentivizing an importer's trade choices along with self-protection and abatement efforts, in contrast to prior work that targets trade alone. Perhaps surprisingly, we find these incentives increase with importers' private risk management incentives and with their ability to directly protect others. In cases where importers can spread infection to each other, we find filterable externalities may lead to multiple Nash equilibria.
传染性家畜疾病问题属于“生物污染”问题。先前关于生物污染问题的研究通常考察预防和控制措施的有效配置,但未识别出提高效率的政策工具设计背后的具体外部性。先前的分析还聚焦于受损方不产生外部性的问题。我们研究的问题是,最初的生物引入对进口商造成损害,随后其他人又因来自该进口商的传播而受到损害。在此,外部性是感染传播至最初的进口商之外。这种外部性受进口商的私人风险管理选择影响,这些选择提供了不纯的公共物品,减少了疾病向他人的溢出——使疾病传播成为一种“可过滤的外部性”。鉴于引入和传播存在不确定性,我们推导出有效的政策激励措施,以使可过滤的疾病外部性内部化。我们发现,与之前仅针对贸易的研究不同,效率要求激励进口商的贸易选择以及自我保护和减排努力。或许令人惊讶的是,我们发现这些激励措施会随着进口商的私人风险管理激励以及他们直接保护他人的能力而增加。在进口商可能相互传播感染的情况下,我们发现可过滤的外部性可能导致多个纳什均衡。