Okpala Gloria Ngozi, Voordouw Gerrit
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Front Microbiol. 2018 Oct 9;9:2423. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02423. eCollection 2018.
Control of microbial reduction of sulfate to sulfide in oil reservoirs (a process referred to as souring) with nitrate has been researched extensively. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite, which is a strong inhibitor of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Perchlorate has been proposed as an alternative souring control agent. It is reduced to chlorate (ClO ) and chlorite (ClO ), which is dismutated to chloride and O. These can react with sulfide to form sulfur. Chlorite is also highly biocidal. Here we compared the effectiveness of perchlorate and nitrate in inhibiting SRB activity in medium containing heavy oil from the Medicine Hat Glauconitic C (MHGC) field, which has a low reservoir temperature and is injected with nitrate to control souring. Using acetate, propionate and butyrate as electron donors, perchlorate-reducing bacteria (PRB) were obtained in enrichment culture and perchlorate-reducing spp. were isolated from MHGC produced waters. In batch experiments with MHGC oil as the electron donor, nitrate was reduced to nitrite and inhibited sulfate reduction. However, perchlorate was not reduced and did not inhibit sulfate reduction in these incubations. Bioreactor experiments were conducted with sand-packed glass columns, containing MHGC oil and inoculated with an oil-grown mesophilic SRB enrichment. Once active souring (reduction of 2 mM sulfate to sulfide) was observed, these were treated with nitrate and/or perchlorate. As in the batch experiments, 4 mM nitrate completely inhibited sulfide production, while partial inhibition occurred with 1 and 2 mM nitrate, but injection of 4 mM perchlorate did not inhibit sulfate reduction and perchlorate was not reduced. The enriched and isolated PRB were unable to use heavy oil components, like alkylbenzenes, which were readily used by nitrate-reducing bacteria. Hence perchlorate, injected into a low temperature heavy oil reservoir like the MHGC, may not be reduced to toxic intermediates making nitrate a preferable souring control agent.
利用硝酸盐控制油藏中微生物将硫酸盐还原为硫化物的过程(该过程称为酸化)已得到广泛研究。硝酸盐被还原为亚硝酸盐,亚硝酸盐是硫酸盐还原菌(SRB)的强抑制剂。高氯酸盐已被提议作为一种替代的酸化控制剂。它被还原为氯酸盐(ClO)和亚氯酸盐(ClO),亚氯酸盐歧化为氯化物和氧气。这些物质可与硫化物反应形成硫。亚氯酸盐也具有很强的杀菌作用。在此,我们比较了高氯酸盐和硝酸盐在抑制含有来自梅迪辛哈特海绿石C(MHGC)油田稠油的培养基中SRB活性方面的效果,该油田储层温度较低且注入硝酸盐以控制酸化。以乙酸盐、丙酸盐和丁酸盐作为电子供体,通过富集培养获得了高氯酸盐还原菌(PRB),并从MHGC采出水中分离出了高氯酸盐还原菌属。在以MHGC油作为电子供体的批次实验中,硝酸盐被还原为亚硝酸盐并抑制了硫酸盐还原。然而,在这些培养中高氯酸盐未被还原且未抑制硫酸盐还原。使用填充有沙子的玻璃柱进行生物反应器实验,柱中含有MHGC油并接种了在油中生长的嗜温SRB富集物。一旦观察到活跃的酸化现象(将2 mM硫酸盐还原为硫化物),就用硝酸盐和/或高氯酸盐对其进行处理。与批次实验一样,4 mM硝酸盐完全抑制了硫化物的产生,而1 mM和2 mM硝酸盐产生了部分抑制作用,但注入4 mM高氯酸盐并未抑制硫酸盐还原且高氯酸盐未被还原。富集和分离出的PRB无法利用稠油成分,如烷基苯,而硝酸盐还原菌很容易利用这些成分。因此,注入像MHGC这样的低温稠油储层中的高氯酸盐可能不会被还原为有毒中间体,这使得硝酸盐成为更可取的酸化控制剂。