Harvard Center for Work, Health and Wellbeing, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 25;15(11):2354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112354.
This study evaluated the efficacy of an integrated Total Worker Health program, "All the Right Moves", designed to target the conditions of work and workers' health behaviors through an ergonomics program combined with a worksite-based health promotion Health Week intervention. A matched-pair cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted on ten worksites (five intervention ( = 324); five control sites ( = 283)). Worker surveys were collected at all sites pre- and post- exposure at one- and six-months. Linear and logistic regression models evaluated the effect of the intervention on pain and injury, dietary and physical activity behaviors, smoking, ergonomic practices, and work limitations. Worker focus groups and manager interviews supplemented the evaluation. After controlling for matched intervention and control pairs as well as covariates, at one-month following the ergonomics program we observed a significant improvement in ergonomic practices (B = 0.20, = 0.002), and a reduction in incidences of pain and injury (OR = 0.58, = 0.012) in the intervention group. At six months, we observed differences in favor of the intervention group for a reduction in physically demanding work (B = -0.25, = 0.008), increased recreational physical activity (B = 35.2, = 0.026) and higher consumption of fruits and vegetables (B = 0.87, = 0.008). Process evaluation revealed barriers to intervention implementation fidelity and uptake, including a fissured multiemployer worksite, the itinerant nature of workers, competing production pressures, management support, and inclement weather. The All the Right Moves program had a positive impact at the individual level on the worksites with the program. For the longer term, the multi-organizational structure in the construction work environment needs to be considered to facilitate more upstream, long-term changes.
本研究评估了一项综合的“全员健康计划”(Total Worker Health program)的效果,该计划名为“All the Right Moves”,旨在通过一项人体工程学计划与基于工作场所的健康促进“健康周”干预相结合,来改善工作条件和工人健康行为。在十个工作场所(五个干预组( = 324);五个对照组( = 283))进行了配对的群组随机对照试验。在暴露前后的一个月和六个月,在所有地点收集了工人调查。线性和逻辑回归模型评估了干预对疼痛和伤害、饮食和体育活动行为、吸烟、人体工程学实践和工作限制的影响。工人焦点小组和经理访谈补充了评估。在控制了配对的干预组和对照组以及协变量后,在进行人体工程学计划一个月后,我们观察到干预组的人体工程学实践有显著改善(B = 0.20, = 0.002),疼痛和伤害的发生率降低(OR = 0.58, = 0.012)。在六个月时,我们观察到干预组在减少体力要求高的工作(B = -0.25, = 0.008)、增加娱乐性体育活动(B = 35.2, = 0.026)和增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量(B = 0.87, = 0.008)方面有优势。过程评估揭示了干预实施一致性和采用的障碍,包括多雇主的分裂工作场所、工人的流动性、竞争的生产压力、管理层的支持以及恶劣的天气。All the Right Moves 计划在有该计划的工作场所对个人层面产生了积极影响。从长期来看,需要考虑建筑工作环境中的多组织结构,以促进更上游、更长期的变化。