Stadnyk Antony M J, Rehrer Nancy J, Handcock Phil J, Meredith-Jones Kim A, Cotter James D
School of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Temperature (Austin). 2017 Dec 7;5(2):175-183. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2017.1391366. eCollection 2018.
Heat is a major stressor during exercise, though its value in driving adaptation is not well understood. Muscle heating can upregulate pathways facilitating protein synthesis and could thereby enhance effects of exercise training, however, few studies have investigated this possibility. We examined whether heating active muscle during resistance training differentially affected physical and functional adaptations. Within a randomised contralateral-limb control study, ten healthy, resistance-untrained individuals (21 ± 3 y; 5 female) completed 30 sessions of progressive resistance training (12 weeks), performing 4 × 8 unilateral knee extensions at 70% of 1RM. One randomly-allocated thigh was heated during, and for 20 min after, each session using an electric pad eliciting muscle temperatures of >38 °C (HOT); the contralateral limb remained unheated (CON). Training intensity was progressed using 4-weekly strength assessments. Quadricep lean mass (measured using DXA) increased by 15 ± 7% in HOT ( = 0.00) and 15 ± 6% in CON ( = 0.00); the difference being trivial ( = 0.94). Peak isokinetic torque at 90°.s increased by 30 ± 25% (HOT; = 0.00) and 34 ± 33% (CON; = 0.01), with no difference ( = 0.84) between limbs. Rate of torque development increased ∼40%, with no difference between limbs ( = 0.73). The increase in 3-RM strength was also similar in HOT (75 ± 16%) and CON (71 ± 14%; = 0.80 for difference). No differences in mass or strength changes were evident between sexes. In conclusion, supplemental heating of active muscle during and after each bout of resistance training showed no clear positive (or negative) effect on training-induced hypertrophy or function.
热量是运动过程中的主要应激源,尽管其在驱动适应性方面的价值尚未得到充分理解。肌肉升温可上调促进蛋白质合成的途径,从而可能增强运动训练的效果,然而,很少有研究探讨这种可能性。我们研究了在抗阻训练期间对活动肌肉进行加热是否会对身体和功能适应性产生不同影响。在一项随机对侧肢体对照研究中,10名健康的、未进行过抗阻训练的个体(21±3岁;5名女性)完成了30节渐进性抗阻训练课程(12周),以1RM的70%进行4组每组8次的单侧膝关节伸展。每次训练期间及训练后20分钟,使用电垫对随机分配的一侧大腿进行加热,使肌肉温度>38°C(热刺激组);对侧肢体不加热(对照组)。使用每四周进行一次的力量评估来逐步增加训练强度。热刺激组股四头肌瘦体重(使用双能X线吸收法测量)增加了15±7%(P = 0.00),对照组增加了15±6%(P = 0.00);差异微不足道(P = 0.94)。90°/秒时的等速峰值扭矩在热刺激组增加了30±25%(P = 0.00),在对照组增加了34±33%(P = 0.01),两侧之间无差异(P = 0.84)。扭矩发展速率增加了约40%,两侧之间无差异(P = 0.73)。热刺激组3次重复最大力量的增加(75±16%)与对照组(71±14%;差异P = 0.80)也相似。性别之间在质量或力量变化方面没有明显差异。总之,在每次抗阻训练期间及之后对活动肌肉进行补充加热,对训练诱导的肥大或功能没有明显的积极(或消极)影响。