Chaillou Thomas, Treigyte Viktorija, Mosely Sarah, Brazaitis Marius, Venckunas Tomas, Cheng Arthur J
School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Sports Science and Innovation Institute, Lithuanian Sports University, 44221, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Sports Med Open. 2022 Mar 7;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00428-9.
The application of post-exercise cooling (e.g., cold water immersion) and post-exercise heating has become a popular intervention which is assumed to increase functional recovery and may improve chronic training adaptations. However, the effectiveness of such post-exercise temperature manipulations remains uncertain. The aim of this comprehensive review was to analyze the effects of post-exercise cooling and post-exercise heating on neuromuscular function (maximal strength and power), fatigue resistance, exercise performance, and training adaptations. We focused on three exercise types (resistance, endurance and sprint exercises) and included studies investigating (1) the early recovery phase, (2) the late recovery phase, and (3) repeated application of the treatment. We identified that the primary benefit of cooling was in the early recovery phase (< 1 h post-exercise) in improving fatigue resistance in hot ambient conditions following endurance exercise and possibly enhancing the recovery of maximal strength following resistance exercise. The primary negative impact of cooling was with chronic exposure which impaired strength adaptations and decreased fatigue resistance following resistance training intervention (12 weeks and 4-12 weeks, respectively). In the early recovery phase, cooling could also impair sprint performance following sprint exercise and could possibly reduce neuromuscular function immediately after endurance exercise. Generally, no benefits of acute cooling were observed during the 24-72-h recovery period following resistance and endurance exercises, while it could have some benefits on the recovery of neuromuscular function during the 24-48-h recovery period following sprint exercise. Most studies indicated that chronic cooling does not affect endurance training adaptations following 4-6 week training intervention. We identified limited data employing heating as a recovery intervention, but some indications suggest promise in its application to endurance and sprint exercise.
运动后冷却(如冷水浸泡)和运动后加热的应用已成为一种流行的干预措施,人们认为其可促进功能恢复并可能改善长期训练适应性。然而,这种运动后温度调节的有效性仍不确定。本综述的目的是分析运动后冷却和运动后加热对神经肌肉功能(最大力量和功率)、抗疲劳能力、运动表现和训练适应性的影响。我们聚焦于三种运动类型(阻力运动、耐力运动和冲刺运动),并纳入了研究(1)早期恢复阶段、(2)晚期恢复阶段以及(3)治疗重复应用情况的研究。我们发现,冷却的主要益处在于早期恢复阶段(运动后<1小时),可改善耐力运动后热环境下的抗疲劳能力,并可能增强阻力运动后最大力量的恢复。冷却的主要负面影响在于长期暴露,会削弱阻力训练干预(分别为12周和4 - 12周)后的力量适应性并降低抗疲劳能力。在早期恢复阶段,冷却还可能损害冲刺运动后的冲刺表现,并可能在耐力运动后立即降低神经肌肉功能。一般来说,在阻力运动和耐力运动后的24 - 72小时恢复期间未观察到急性冷却的益处,而在冲刺运动后的24 - 48小时恢复期间其可能对神经肌肉功能的恢复有一些益处。大多数研究表明,在进行4 - 6周训练干预后,长期冷却不会影响耐力训练适应性。我们发现采用加热作为恢复干预措施的数据有限,但一些迹象表明其在耐力运动和冲刺运动中的应用具有前景。