• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后的长期结果。

Long-term outcomes following surgical repair of giant paraoesophageal hiatus hernia.

机构信息

The University of Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, The Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SB, UK.

Department of Oesophago-Gastric Surgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1846-1853. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6463-y. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6463-y
PMID:30406385
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data regarding long-term outcomes after surgical repair of giant paraoesophageal hiatus hernia (GPHH). The aim of this study was to assess symptomatic recurrence and patient-reported outcomes following GPHH repair.

METHODS

178 patients undergoing elective (127) and emergency (51) GPHH repair between 1994 and 2015 were identified from the prospectively collected Lothian Surgical Audit database. Electronic patient records were used to determine rate of clinical recurrence. A postal questionnaire was used to assess modified DeMeester, 'Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale' symptom scores, breathing and exercise tolerance, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 35 months (range 12-238). 15 (8.4%) patients developed a clinical recurrence and 13 (7.3%) underwent a further operation. The clinical recurrence rates were similar in patients followed-up less than 5 years and beyond 5 years [10/128 (7.8%) vs 5/50 (10%)]. Mortality rate was 1.6% for elective compared with 16.7% for emergency procedures (P < 0.001). Completed questionnaires were received from 95 (78.5%) of 121 eligible patients. Mean symptom scores were low (Modified DeMeester 2.6). 83.7% of patients reported a good or excellent outcome, and 97.8% believed they had made the correct decision to undergo surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical repair of GPHH is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction and good overall symptom outcome. There is a clinical recurrence rate of 8.4%, which does not significantly increase with long-term follow-up.

摘要

介绍

关于巨大食管裂孔疝(GPHH)手术后的长期结果,数据有限。本研究旨在评估 GPHH 修复后的症状复发和患者报告的结果。

方法

从前瞻性收集的洛锡安手术审计数据库中确定了 1994 年至 2015 年间接受择期(127 例)和紧急(51 例)GPHH 修复的 178 例患者。使用电子病历记录确定临床复发率。通过邮寄问卷评估改良的 DeMeester、“胃肠道症状评分量表”症状评分、呼吸和运动耐量以及患者满意度。

结果

中位随访时间为 35 个月(范围 12-238)。15 例(8.4%)患者发生临床复发,13 例(7.3%)患者接受进一步手术。随访不足 5 年和超过 5 年的患者临床复发率相似[10/128(7.8%)比 5/50(10%)]。择期手术的死亡率为 1.6%,而急诊手术为 16.7%(P<0.001)。从 121 名符合条件的患者中收到了 95 份(78.5%)完成的问卷。平均症状评分较低(改良 DeMeester 2.6)。83.7%的患者报告治疗效果良好或极好,97.8%的患者认为他们做出了接受手术的正确决定。

结论

GPHH 的手术修复与高满意度和良好的整体症状结果相关。临床复发率为 8.4%,随长期随访无显著增加。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes following surgical repair of giant paraoesophageal hiatus hernia.巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后的长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1846-1853. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6463-y. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
2
Does composite repair of giant paraoesophageal hernia improve patient outcomes?巨大食管旁疝的复合修复术能否改善患者预后?
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Mar;91(3):310-315. doi: 10.1111/ans.16422. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
3
Temporal patterns of hiatus hernia recurrence and hiatal failure: quality of life and recurrence after revision surgery.食管裂孔疝复发和食管裂孔修复失败的时间模式:翻修手术后的生活质量和复发情况
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Apr 1;30(4):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow035.
4
Surgical management of emergency and elective giant paraesophageal hiatus hernias.急诊和择期巨大食管旁裂孔疝的外科治疗
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Feb;23(2):100-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0199. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
5
Dyspnoea improves following composite repair of giant paraoesophageal hernia.呼吸困难在巨大胸骨旁疝复合修补后得到改善。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Jul;105(6):523-527. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0124. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
6
Subjective outcome after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair for intrathoracic stomach.胸腔内胃的腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后的主观结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1504-2. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
7
Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术加或不加补片后患者满意度、生活质量和客观复发率相同。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3673-3680. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5405-9. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Outcome for Asymptomatic Recurrence Following Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia.腹腔镜修复巨大食管裂孔疝后无症状复发的结局
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug;19(8):1385-90. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2807-2. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
9
Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia: five-year cohort study and comparison of mesh-augmented versus standard crura repair.腹腔镜治疗大型食管裂孔疝:五年队列研究及网片增强与标准脚修复的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5404-5409. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4897-7. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia. A single center experience.腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术。单中心经验。
Int J Surg. 2015 Aug;20:149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.067. Epub 2015 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Recurrence in Paraesophageal Hernia: Patient Factors and Composite Surgical Repair in 862 Cases.食管旁疝复发:862 例患者因素和复合手术修复。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2733-2742. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05856-w. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Trends in outcomes of 862 giant hiatus hernia repairs over 30 years.30 年来 862 例巨大食管裂孔疝修补术治疗结果的趋势。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1543-1553. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02873-1. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
3
Impact of laparoscopic repair on type III/IV giant paraesophageal hernias: a single-center experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic anterior and Nissen fundoplication.腹腔镜下前位胃底折叠术和nissen胃底折叠术后的长期疗效
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Apr;87(4):300-304. doi: 10.1111/ans.13358. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
2
Durability of giant hiatus hernia repair in 455 patients over 20 years.455例巨大食管裂孔疝患者20年的修补耐久性
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 Apr;97(3):188-93. doi: 10.1308/003588414X14055925060839.
3
Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial.
腹腔镜修补术治疗 III/IV 型巨大食管裂孔疝的单中心经验。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1555-1570. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02851-7. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
4
Emergency surgery for hiatus hernias: does technique affect outcomes? A single-centre experience.食管裂孔疝的急诊手术:技术会影响结果吗?单中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1227-1233. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01482-y. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
5
Laparoscopic fundoplication for para-oesophageal hernia repair improves respiratory function in patients with dyspnoea: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜胃底折叠术治疗食管旁疝修补术改善呼吸困难患者的呼吸功能:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7266-7278. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09127-8. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Giant paraesophageal hernia: What do we really know?巨大食管旁疝:我们究竟了解多少?
JTCVS Tech. 2020 Aug 13;3:367-372. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.08.021. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Do Poor Functional Outcomes and Higher Morbidity Following Emergency Repair of Giant Hiatus Hernia Warrant Elective Surgery in Asymptomatic Patients?巨大食管裂孔疝急诊修补术后功能预后差和发病率高,无症状患者是否需要择期手术?
Front Surg. 2021 Feb 11;8:628477. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.628477. eCollection 2021.
8
Non-elective paraesophageal hernia repair: surgical approaches and short-term outcomes.非择期食管裂孔疝修补术:手术方法和短期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3405-3411. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07782-3. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
腹腔镜修补超大裂孔疝:缝线修补与可吸收补片修补及不可吸收补片修补的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):282-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000842.
4
Repair of giant paraesophageal hernias routinely produces improvement in respiratory function.巨大食管裂孔疝的修复通常可改善呼吸功能。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Feb;143(2):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.025. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
5
Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.生物补片预防腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后复发:一项多中心前瞻性随机试验的长期随访结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Oct;213(4):461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
6
Laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernia: impact on dyspnoea.腹腔镜修补巨大食管裂孔疝:对呼吸困难的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Nov;25(11):3620-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1768-0. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
7
Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术。长期随访显示,尽管放射影像学复发率较高,但临床结果良好。
Ann Surg. 2011 Feb;253(2):291-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff44c0.
8
Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后 10 年的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Feb;139(2):395-404, 404.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
9
Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.生物假体可降低腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术后的复发率:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2006 Oct;244(4):481-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000237759.42831.03.
10
Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.手术并发症的分类:一项在6336例患者队列中进行评估的新提议及一项调查结果
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.