Suppr超能文献

在空调环境下,使用密闭腔室测量仪对多汗症患者和非多汗症患者的经皮水分流失进行对比研究。

Comparative study of transepidermal water loss in patients with and without hyperhidrosis by closed-chamber measurer in an air-conditioned environment.

作者信息

Miotto Andre, Honda Pedro Augusto Antunes, Bachichi Thiago Gangi, Holanda Caio Santos, Evangelista Neto Ernesto, Perfeito João Alessio Juliano, Leão Luiz Eduardo Villaça, Costa Altair da Silva

机构信息

Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2018 Nov 8;16(4):eAO4312. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2018AO4312.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the difference in transepidermal water loss in patients diagnosed with hyperhidrosis and healthy subjects, in an air-conditioned environment.

METHODS

Twenty patients diagnosed with hyperhidrosis and 20 healthy subjects were subjected to quantitative assessment using a closed-chamber device, in six previously established sites.

RESULTS

The measurements showed different transepidermal water loss values for healthy subjects and patients with hyperhidrosis, especially in the hands and feet. In the Control Group, the median for the hands was 46.4g/m2/hour (p25: 36.0; p75: 57.6), while in the Hyperhidrosis Group, the median was 123.5g/m2/hour (p25: 54.3; p75: 161.2) - p<0.001. For the feet, the Control Group had a median of 41.5g/m2/hour (p25: 31.3; p75: 63.5) and the Hyperhidrosis Group, 61.2g/m2/hour (p25: 32.3; p75: 117) - p<0.02. Measurements of the axillas also showed differences. In the Control Group, the median was 14.8g/m2/hour (p25: 11.8; p75: 19.0) and, in the Hyperhidrosis Group, 83.5g/m2/hour (p25: 29.5; p75: 161.7) - p<0.001.

CONCLUSION

Measuring transepidermal water loss is sufficient for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with hyperhidrosis.

摘要

目的

评估在空调环境下,多汗症患者与健康受试者经皮水分流失的差异。

方法

20例多汗症患者和20名健康受试者使用密闭腔室装置,在六个预先确定的部位进行定量评估。

结果

测量结果显示,健康受试者和多汗症患者的经皮水分流失值不同,尤其是在手部和足部。在对照组中,手部的中位数为46.4g/m²/小时(第25百分位数:36.0;第75百分位数:57.6),而在多汗症组中,中位数为123.5g/m²/小时(第25百分位数:54.3;第75百分位数:161.2)——p<0.001。足部方面,对照组中位数为41.5g/m²/小时(第25百分位数:31.3;第75百分位数:63.5),多汗症组为61.2g/m²/小时(第25百分位数:32.3;第75百分位数:117)——p<0.02。腋窝测量结果也显示出差异。对照组中位数为14.8g/m²/小时(第25百分位数:11.8;第75百分位数:19.0),多汗症组为83.5g/m²/小时(第25百分位数:29.5;第75百分位数:161.7)——p<0.001。

结论

测量经皮水分流失足以用于多汗症患者的诊断和随访。

相似文献

8
Newborn transepidermal water loss values: a reference dataset.新生儿经表皮水分流失值:一个参考数据集。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2013 Nov-Dec;30(6):712-6. doi: 10.1111/pde.12106. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

3
Climate and skin function: an overview.气候与皮肤功能:概述。
Skin Res Technol. 2013 Aug;19(3):207-12. doi: 10.1111/srt.12043. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
9
Comparison of closed chamber and open chamber evaporimetry.密闭腔室与开放腔室蒸发测定法的比较
Skin Res Technol. 2009 Feb;15(1):51-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00334.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验