Pollmann Monique M H, Krahmer Emiel J
Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
J Lang Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep;37(4):497-517. doi: 10.1177/0261927X17736084. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
According to common belief, friends communicate more accurately and efficiently than strangers, because they can use uniquely shared knowledge and common knowledge to explain things to each other, while strangers are restricted to common knowledge. To test this belief, we asked friends and strangers to play, via e-mail and face-to-face, the word-description game , in which objects need to be described without using certain "taboo" words. When descriptions were sent via e-mail, there was no difference in accuracy (number of correct answers) nor in efficiency (number of words per correct answer) between friends and strangers. When descriptions were given face-to-face, friends were more accurate than strangers, but not more efficient (number of seconds and words per correct answer). Shared knowledge did not predict accuracy or efficiency. Hence, our findings do not support the idea that friends only need a few words to understand each other.
人们普遍认为,朋友之间的交流比陌生人更准确、高效,因为他们可以利用独特的共享知识和常识相互解释事情,而陌生人则只能依赖常识。为了验证这一观点,我们让朋友和陌生人通过电子邮件和面对面的方式玩“词语描述游戏”,游戏中需要在不使用某些“禁忌”词汇的情况下描述物体。当通过电子邮件发送描述时,朋友和陌生人在准确性(正确答案的数量)和效率(每个正确答案的单词数量)方面没有差异。当面对面进行描述时,朋友比陌生人更准确,但在效率方面(每个正确答案的秒数和单词数)并非如此。共享知识并不能预测准确性或效率。因此,我们的研究结果并不支持朋友之间只需要几句话就能相互理解的观点。