Suppr超能文献

朋友和陌生人如何玩这个游戏?一项关于准确性、效率、动机以及共享知识运用的研究。

How Do Friends and Strangers Play the Game ? A Study of Accuracy, Efficiency, Motivation, and the Use of Shared Knowledge.

作者信息

Pollmann Monique M H, Krahmer Emiel J

机构信息

Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Lang Soc Psychol. 2018 Sep;37(4):497-517. doi: 10.1177/0261927X17736084. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

Abstract

According to common belief, friends communicate more accurately and efficiently than strangers, because they can use uniquely shared knowledge and common knowledge to explain things to each other, while strangers are restricted to common knowledge. To test this belief, we asked friends and strangers to play, via e-mail and face-to-face, the word-description game , in which objects need to be described without using certain "taboo" words. When descriptions were sent via e-mail, there was no difference in accuracy (number of correct answers) nor in efficiency (number of words per correct answer) between friends and strangers. When descriptions were given face-to-face, friends were more accurate than strangers, but not more efficient (number of seconds and words per correct answer). Shared knowledge did not predict accuracy or efficiency. Hence, our findings do not support the idea that friends only need a few words to understand each other.

摘要

人们普遍认为,朋友之间的交流比陌生人更准确、高效,因为他们可以利用独特的共享知识和常识相互解释事情,而陌生人则只能依赖常识。为了验证这一观点,我们让朋友和陌生人通过电子邮件和面对面的方式玩“词语描述游戏”,游戏中需要在不使用某些“禁忌”词汇的情况下描述物体。当通过电子邮件发送描述时,朋友和陌生人在准确性(正确答案的数量)和效率(每个正确答案的单词数量)方面没有差异。当面对面进行描述时,朋友比陌生人更准确,但在效率方面(每个正确答案的秒数和单词数)并非如此。共享知识并不能预测准确性或效率。因此,我们的研究结果并不支持朋友之间只需要几句话就能相互理解的观点。

相似文献

2
Long gaps between turns are awkward for strangers but not for friends.交谈时如果长时间不接话会让陌生人感到尴尬,但朋友之间不会。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Apr 24;378(1875):20210471. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0471. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
8
Is friendship akin to kinship?友谊与亲情相似吗?
Evol Hum Behav. 2007 Sep;28(5):365-374. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.04.004.
10
The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words.禁忌语的实用性和普遍性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;4(2):153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x.

本文引用的文献

1
8
Referring as a collaborative process.将其视为一个协作过程。
Cognition. 1986 Feb;22(1):1-39. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验